<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Revisiting the Boston dailies' Crockefeller battle</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/08/13/revisiting-the-boston-dailies-crockefeller-battle.aspx</link><description>A couple days ago, I suggested that the Herald had been driving the &amp;quot;Clark Rockefeller&amp;quot; story more than the Globe. But I also reserved the right to weasel out of that assessment. Let the weaseling commence. After hunkering down with a couple</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Revisiting the Boston dailies' Crockefeller battle</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/08/13/revisiting-the-boston-dailies-crockefeller-battle.aspx#144880</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:16:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:144880</guid><dc:creator>Globe type</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is an accurate analysis. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=144880" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>