<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx</link><description>Lipstick-gate is currently the top item on Google News . But if you look for the full quote that triggered it, you won&amp;#39;t get it from Fox&amp;#39;s latest write-up, or the Times&amp;#39;s , or the Wall Street Journal&amp;#39;s , or numerous others. This is a shame</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156997</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:17:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156997</guid><dc:creator>gordon marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think Darth Vadar will get you for voting 3rd party. &amp;nbsp;It's a safe bet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156997" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156874</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:04:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156874</guid><dc:creator>joe blow</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;who gives a shit, who gives a fuck? &amp;nbsp;vote 3rd party enough of these liars and criminals &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156874" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156770</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:46:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156770</guid><dc:creator>gordon marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;On the Bill O'Reilly Obama interview, I noticed that both of them embraced the American dream, recasting the sarcastic use of the expression &amp;quot;only in America&amp;quot; Giuliani had given it. &amp;nbsp;How does Giuliani get away with mocking the American dream? Isn't suggesting that Obama is--well, I'll say it. &amp;nbsp;That black guy that got his way into the presidency--isn't that more abominable than mocking McCain for choosing an underqualified &amp;nbsp;VP candidate?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156770" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156752</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:53:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156752</guid><dc:creator>gordon marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually looked at the &amp;quot;lipstick video&amp;quot; and saw that Obama was covering his face when he said it. &amp;nbsp;It was patent and evident that this was a line his handlers has coerced (cajoled?) him into saying. &amp;nbsp;His frown afterward demonstrated that he knew there was no humor in. &amp;nbsp;In the final analysis, I'm sure he regretted it. &amp;nbsp;Though at the same time he was probably persuaded, accurately or not, that this was an effective campaign tactic, necessary or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156752" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156268</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:44:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156268</guid><dc:creator>gordon marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the sensitivity goes back to women's fear of being &amp;quot;fat&amp;quot; and developing an eating disorder. &amp;nbsp;I don't think Obama meant to give Palin an eating disorder; but there we go again--the whole nebulous world of feminine psycho-politics that, nice guy or not, he will have to treat gingerly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156268" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156255</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:49:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156255</guid><dc:creator>Adam Reilly</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oldspice, you've offered an assertion with no evidence. &amp;quot;Most certainly&amp;quot; based on... what, exactly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156255" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lipstick-gate: Balance vs. truth</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/09/10/lipstick-gate-balance-vs-truth.aspx#156243</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:24:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:156243</guid><dc:creator>oldspice</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; He most certainly was directing the comment to Palin. The audience obviously got the joke. Obama was being too cute by half - just as he was when he flipped Clinton off after the ABC debate - again he proves himself unfit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156243" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>