<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Today's Globe/Sox reminder</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/10/13/today-s-globe-sox-reminder.aspx</link><description>In my recent column on media conflicts-of-interest and their disclosure, I credited the Boston Globe for finally realizing that the connection between its corporate parent, the NY Times Co., and the Boston Red Sox should always be noted. But judging from</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>The Globe's vanishing Sox disclaimer</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/10/13/today-s-globe-sox-reminder.aspx#575294</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:01:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:575294</guid><dc:creator>Dont Quote Me</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;amp;#39;s hard to imagine a more service-y Globe story on the Red Sox than today&amp;amp;#39;s front-page piece&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=575294" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>