<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Globe redesign: what say you?</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/10/24/globe-redesign-what-say-you.aspx</link><description>My initial thoughts: --&amp;quot; g &amp;quot; actually looks good, notwithstanding some uninspired cover art. There&amp;#39;s plenty of editorial heft inside, and the &amp;quot;Parting Shot&amp;quot; feature on the penultimate page has tons of potential. Also, let&amp;#39;s</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Globe redesign: what say you?</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/10/24/globe-redesign-what-say-you.aspx#181679</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:33:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:181679</guid><dc:creator>Brian Flaherty</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It's great - the death of the Globe gets closer and closer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181679" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>