The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

What Genocide Deniers and Their Would Be Censors Share

By Wendy Kaminer      

        I can’t say I’m surprised by the enraged comments on my post on the Armenian genocide debate, below.  I criticized the decision to boycott an ADL anti-bias program because ADL president Abe Foxman belatedly called the slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians “tantamount to genocide,” and I questioned the wisdom of providing reparations to people whose distant descendents were the victims of genocide, or other state sanctioned crimes.  So naturally, some readers accuse me of being a genocide denier or simply of bias against Armenians.  I was unsurprised by any of this because I wrote about the ADL/ Armenian genocide fracas after hearing the ADL hysterically associated with hate mongering and tolerance for atrocities, simply because Foxman called the slaughter of Armenians “tantamount to genocide,” instead of emphatically denouncing it as a genocide. 

        But, as I also observed, there was some justice in Foxman’s vilification, since he has shown so little tolerance for the right to hear from anti-zionists as well as anti-Semites, not to mention Holocaust deniers.  Consider his reaction to Columbia University’s decision to invite Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak at a university forum.  “It is inappropriate and a perversion of the concept of freedom of speech," Foxman declared, leaving us to wonder precisely what the “concept of freedom of speech” entails, if not the right to hear controversial and even hateful speech.  We don’t need a concept of free speech to ensure the right to engage uncontroversial and inoffensive speakers, or those approved by the ADL. 

        Of course, Foxman was not alone in protesting the decision to allow Columbia students and faculty to hear Ahmadinejad (who was vigorously questioned and harshly criticized by Columbia President Lee Bollinger.) Protesters gathered outside Columbia, exercising their own speech rights while, in some instances, criticizing the decision to honor the rights of people who gathered to hear the Iranian president.  "
This isn't just a matter of free speech, it's a matter of hate speech," an associate dean at the Jewish Theological Seminary explained predictably.  Protesters also gathered outside the United Nations, where New York City Council speaker Christine Quinn declared, “We’re here to send a message that there is never a reason to give a hate monger an open stage.” 
       
        Some people instinctively understand the virtues of free speech.  One Columbia junior said she supported Columbia "for bringing him here.  It’s a forum. It’s not like Columbia is endorsing him.  He’s the president of a nation and should be allowed to speak.” Others who instinctively embrace a distinction between free speech and hate speech may not be persuaded by any logical arguments debunking it. As Glenn Greenwald observes in Salon, “there is not much new worth saying about the ‘debate’ over whether Columbia should have invited Ahmadinejad to speak. People either believe in the value of having academic institutions be a venue for airing all viewpoints or they do not.”              

         So I’ll simply point out the similarities between people who demand the censorship of "hate speech" on university campuses, (and elsewhere,) members of the Armenian community today who brook not the slightest equivocation about the moral imperative to label them victims of genocide, and Turkish officials who recently tried to ban a conference on the Armenian genocide question.  Obviously one person’s hate speech is another person’s truth. 

        I’m not suggesting that facts don't matter and all truth is relative.  Indeed, the more you believe that facts matter, the more you believe in the power of reason and evidence, the more you believe - or should believe - in free speech.  People who put their faith in facts should be prepared to debate them.  For those of us without a direct line to God, truth is a product of argument, not revelation.



  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article

6 Comments

  • Phantom said:

    In a perfect world where all speech is expressed in a vacuum, you may be correct. Unfortunately, the world is not perfect, and the winners, conquerors and powerful of this world tend to have an extreme advantage over those who are oppressed and slaughtered. It's the reason why an educated person like you is still supposedly ignorant about the facts of the Armenian Genocide. If the marketplace of ideas was a perfect marketplace, you wouldn't be running around telling people that you are agnostic on whether or not to call the Armenian situation a Genocide. The truth is known by the historians, yet people like you still feign ignorance, and you may even be honest in your declaration of ignorance. But the reason why you are ignorant and agnostic on this issue is because the powerful denial machine of an entire nation has been hard at work for 92 years covering up their crime; not because the marketplace of ideas has two opposing and equally strong viewpoints. Thus, I am sorry, but when it comes to hate speech, especially when the speech comes from the powerful against the oppressed, I cannot be with you in your view. If Hitler had prevailed as the Turks did after the fallout of WWI, the marketplace of ideas would not have illuminated us about the truth of the Holocaust. We need freedom of speech to make sure the little voices are heard, but we also need to keep it in check so that the powerful do not use it to oppress the weak. This is especially true with respect to the crime of Genocide, because the victims usually have no voice for generations if ever again. They don't have the strength and the power to fight revisionism and lies. Just look at the Armenians; 92 years later, and we are still dealing with "agnostics" like you!
    September 24, 2007 10:33 PM
  • Megan Rees said:

    I think that Ms. Kaminer is confused about the source of our anger with the ADL. As an international lobbying group they are entitled to say whatever they want about whomever they want. But I will not stand back while this same group tries to come into our towns under the guise of a human rights organization to teach our children about anti-bias and anti-hate. They themselves say that genocide denial is the worst form of hate crime. Though they are entitled to their denialist opinions, these opinions automatically disqualify them from being able to teach our children about truth and justice.
    September 25, 2007 1:38 PM
  • Megan Rees said:

    Correction: It is Mr. Silverglate who I am referring to in the above comment, not Ms. Kaminer.
    September 25, 2007 3:54 PM
  • Narini Badalian said:

    FACT: “When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations [of the Armenians], they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact.”- Henry Morgenthau, American Ambassador to Ottoman Turkey, 1915. FACT: "The Turkish government has driven its Armenian subjects, the innocent ones, mark you, into the desert by the thousands upon thousands, under the pretext of having to remove them from the war areas, exempting neither the sick nor the pregnant women... has had the men illegally shot in lonely places...It has released prisoners from the prisons, put them in soldiers' uniforms and sent them into the desert where the deportees would be passing through...The Turkish government will not be able to deny responsibility for all that has happened."- Germany’s (Turkey's wartime ally) Consular in Aleppo, Roessler. FACT: “We Turks savagely killed off the Armenians” “Armenians were not killed en masse by individual Turks; they were killed wholesale by the official policy of the central government of the Ottoman empire." -President of the Post-WWI Senate Ahmed Riza, October 1918 FACT: The Turkish-Military Tribunals from the Armistice Period (1918-1919) found the Ittihadist ve Terraki (Committee of Union and Progress) governmental officials, on all levels, guilty of crimes against Armenians- Enver, Talaat and Cemal Pashas sentenced to death in absentia. FACT: Dozens of nation-states and international bodies have recognized the Armenian Genocide as historical fact AND condemned the denial by Turkey. For full details of Affirmation please see: http://www.armeniangenocide.org/affirmation.html FACT: When the Turkish government, in 2005, called for a "joint- commission" - The International Association of Genocide Scholars- the people who study the evidence and facts- wrote an open letter to Prime Minster Erdogan, which I will post-separately, but note here: “We [IAGS] represent the major body of scholars who study genocide in North America and Europe…We note that there may be differing interpretations of genocide—how and why the Armenian Genocide happened, but to deny its factual and moral reality as genocide is not to engage in scholarship but in propaganda and efforts to absolve the perpetrator, blame the victims, and erase the ethical meaning of this history." COMMENT: Wendy Kaminer writes (9/20/07) “why should we encourage people to feel so horribly victimized…I leave to history both its perpetrators and victims.” The real victims in this equation, however, are those who believe that genocide is simply a historical issue and that history is something that exists in textbooks. The real victims are those, who believing they are being critical are simply being fashionably proactive. How much more exciting it must be to be on the forefront of pointing fingers and not having to be accountable for the facts. QUESTION: What is it going to take on your part, what more do you require, to accept the fact of the Armenian Genocide?
    September 25, 2007 7:42 PM
  • Zareh Sahakian said:

    Ms. Kaminer, if freedom of speech is what you are advocating then it is only logical that you hear also what others have to say about your opinions. With all due respect your ideas about the "Armenian genocide fracas" as you call it are simply nonsensical. You seem to think this whole issue about Foxman and ADL rests in the word "tantamount" in his description of the Armenian genocide. It is much more than that. You ignore the policies taken many years ago by prominent Jewish organizations in the United States, including the ADL to actively work for the Turkish government to block any resolutions that come up in the US Congress. You ignore the fact that the day Foxman took to "recognize" the "tantamount" genocide he called Turkish Prime minister Erdogan to apologize for what he had to do. You ignore the fact that on one hand he reluctantly "compromises" on this issue and then quickly reaffirms his intentions to work against the Armenians. You have said before that you also regard Foxman's behaviour as hypocritical, then why do you disagree with people who want to put a stop to such hypocrisies? If you really believe that "one's hate speech is another's truth" then it is up to you, as an outside observer, to look at the issues with more depth and hopefully with more research , how else can one determine which is hate and which is truth, and why bother with this issue in the first place? By the way, for your information, when you repeatedly call "distant descendants" as being the victims of genocide, I understand that you mean: "it's an old story why to bother with people who have no connections to it", Well, you are talking about both my parents who survived the genocide thanks to European and American missionaries working in the Ottoman Empire, to whom they owed their lives and to whom I have deep and everlasting gratitude. You also say that the Genocide recognition is simply a case of "following money". It is not about money. It is about modern Turkey, which seemingly has nothing to do with the old Ottoman Empire, yet continuously denies the reality and worst, fabricates lies to support the official stance, under serious penalties against those who disagree with official fabrications. Now there's a subject for you to expand your horizon. This is not an old story, this is happening today. On the issue of reparations, neither you nor anybody else can dismiss the rightful pursuit by Armenians for true and fair reparations. No self respecting nation can abdicate the responsibility for demanding the lands and the properties of their forefathers, a stolen homeland that was achieved by murder, plunder and wholesale centrally planned extermination of an indigenous people, and then incorporate those "empty" lands in a country called Turkey.
    September 25, 2007 7:53 PM
  • Alik said:

    The Armenian genocide is denied by its perpetrator, the Turkish government. When individuals or organizations use their right to free speech to deny the Armenian genocide, they help Turkey in its denial campaign, and that’s the reason why they should be exposed. After Turkey acknowledges its crime against my people and starts educating the Turkish people about their past instead of perpetuating a lie, I personally don’t give a damn about who else denies the Armenian genocide. In this specific case, the ADL is targeted because it is a HUMAN RIGHTS organization and is working against the HUMAN RIGHTS of Armenians, not only by denying the Armenian genocide, but also by helping Turkey in its campaign of denial. Ms. Kaminer, the fact that we have to explain these “details” to you is truly astonishing.
    September 26, 2007 1:02 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join
Follow the Phoenix
  • newsletter
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss
All Blogs
Related Articles

1001_speech_list
Boston Phoenix
Free speech for me, but not for thee
Published 1/29/2010 by HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Freedom Watch

0911_luc_list5
Boston Phoenix
Critical Mass
Published 11/20/2009 by KYLE SMEALLIE AND HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Over the years, UMass Amherst has proven to be a reliable hotbed for political hypocrisy and squelching of free speech

more by Wendy Kaminer
Second Lady | August 30, 2008
Hillary's Harpies | August 27, 2008
No We Can't | July 10, 2008
Anti-Noose Laws | May 19, 2008
It's a Crime to Lie to MYSpace? | May 16, 2008

 See all articles by: Wendy Kaminer

ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Comments
Tron Legacy: Serious Business - I'm really looking forward to Tron Legacy. I liked the original concept of Tron, because I'm a huge video...

By fearix on 03-20-2010 in Laser Orgy

SXSW 2010 (Wednesday) mid-day review and video: Japandroids, Morning Benders and more - Nope. Totally didn't.

By sccc on 03-19-2010 in On The Download

Fuck Rachael Ray and Her Annoying SXSW Party - Couldn't agree with you more!

By Yara on 03-19-2010 in On The Download

Q&A #8: Katherine Clark - A lawyer from the politically connected firm Mintz, Levin running as an outsider?

By capecodder on 03-18-2010 in Talking Politics

Fuck Rachael Ray and Her Annoying SXSW Party - Dude, if you're gonna slam the woman, at least check that you don't typo her name in your opening sentence...

By Brenna on 03-18-2010 in On The Download

Latest Comments from Free For All
Most Viewed
MP3: Aziz Ansari and Dave Sitek, "AAAAAAAANGRY"
Massachusetts #Idol: Are you voting for Cape Cod's Siobhan Magnus or Chelsea's Ashley Rodriguez?
"On behalf of every man, looking out for every girl"....watch out. John Mayer and his racist dong are coming to town
Booty Advisory: Thaw-some
FYI: Thom Yorke has renamed his band and they're playing Boston on April 8. Tickets on sale next week!
Cartoon angst revisited: Daria set for May DVD release
Bushwallas: Or, 21 of the most unfortunate imaginary cover bands we could think of
Most Viewed from Free For All
Search Blogs
 
Free For All Archives
Saturday, March 20, 2010  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
thePhoenix.com
Phoenix Media/Communications Group
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group