This Just In: Pandering Porn -- and Romeo & Juliet

Published May 19 2008, 09:38 PM by Harvey Silverglate

This morning, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that outlaws promoting or advertising -- "pandering" -- child pornography is constitutional and does not interfere with First Amendment freedoms. In the case, United States v. Williams, decided 7-2, the justices declared that there is no free speech right that protects "offers to provide or requests to obtain child pornography," even if (in fact) there is no pornography to be provided. Free speech expert and blogger Eugene Volokh explains that the case is actually more interesting than a simple child pornography case, as the court has, in his reading, recognized that the First Amendment does not protect solicitations (or offers) to commit a crime. He writes: "[t]rying to buy illegal drugs, for instance, by soliciting someone to sell them to you is generally a criminal attempt even if the solicited seller was only going to deliver fake drugs rather than real ones."

Wendy Kaminer wrote about this case on The Free For All back in November.

Filed Under: censorship, cyberspace, First Amendment, free speech, indecency

Back to Free For All

This Just In: Pandering Porn -- and Romeo & Juliet

Follow the Boston Phoenix

All Blogs

Talking Politics (1,519)
Phlog (1,416)
Outside The Frame (303)
Dont Quote Me (516)
On The Download (2,157)
Laser Orgy (31)

Filed Under: censorship, cyberspace, First Amendment, free speech, indecency, pornography

Boston Phoenix
Critical Mass
Published 11/20/2009 by KYLE SMEALLIE AND HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Over the years, UMass Amherst has proven to be a reliable hotbed for political hypocrisy and squelching of free speech

Boston Phoenix
Courthouse bomber to speak about social change
Published 11/13/2009 by RICK WORMWOOD
Censorship averted

more by Harvey Silverglate

Free speech again quashed at Harvard | October 23, 2009

The Gates case isn't about race | August 07, 2009

Muzzle Awards: Collegiate Division | July 10, 2009

Guilty until proven guilty | June 26, 2009

Sotomayor's mixed message on free speech | June 05, 2009

See all articles by: Harvey Silverglate

Latest Comments

City Council Forums - я хочу где тёлки пиздатые но всё равно как думаете так можно делать? ? http://www.popkii.8m.com смешные...

By Unataoli on 11-23-2009 in Talking Politics

Tisei's sexuality: news or not? - Brian, that "interesting" sounds like you've got a point to make. So do it! I confess that...

By Adam Reilly on 11-23-2009 in Dont Quote Me

Tisei's sexuality: news or not? - No mentions of RedMassGroup and this discussion about him over there? Interesting.

By Brian on 11-23-2009 in Dont Quote Me

City Council Forums - Die fünfjährige Robin B. zeigt aufgeregt ihr erstes 25-Cent-Stück, das sie mit ihrem ACE...

By NipsfepeOrere on 11-23-2009 in Talking Politics

City Council Forums - [... - thephoenix.com is other wonderful place of tips. Online Car insurance claims [... -

By Used Solar Panels >> Get cheap used solar panel on 11-23-2009 in Talking Politics

Latest Comments from Free For All

This Just In: Pandering Porn -- and Romeo &amp; Juliet