<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yesterday's dubious Globe op-ed</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/medialog/archive/2008/08/12/yesterday-s-dubious-globe-op-ed.aspx</link><description>I didn&amp;#39;t read this Globe op-ed on &amp;quot; linguistic paranoia &amp;quot; until yesterday evening. But when I did, my sympathy for the author&amp;#39;s goal was pretty much negated by her deeply questionable reasoning. Nataly Kelly--&amp;quot;a senior analyst with</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator></channel></rss>