Boston Now whiffs (again) on Scientology

re: Boston Now whiffs (again) on Scientology

Joshua — Mon, 12 May 2008 22:55:33 GMT

Agreed. It seems rather petty for Phoenix to trash BostonNOW's coverage of a story that Phoenix didn't cover at all. I mean, if you want something done right, do it yourself. It's not like Phoenix lacks the resources to cover the story or anything.

re: Boston Now whiffs (again) on Scientology

anon and on and on — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:05:28 GMT

while i agree that the article certainly was lacking in content and context, the important thing is that bostonNOW was willing to cover the story at all. i would be delighted if the phoenix would take the time to cover the anonymous vs CoS battle. the protests are drawing hundreds of participants and, based on the fact that high ranking ex-scientologists are coming forward and standing with anonymous, the movement is growing and gaining acceptance with established long-time critics of the church.

re: Boston Now whiffs (again) on Scientology

h20 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:29:52 GMT

It would be great if your publication would at least cover this issue instead of mocking other papers that cover it.

re: Boston Now whiffs (again) on Scientology

Ron Newman — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:00:10 GMT

Despite the article's problems, Anonymous was glad to see BostonNOW publish it on the front page. Any publicity being good publicity for the cause right now...