The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 

Two wars: the difference of 40 years

Earlier this year, there was a TV report from Afghanistan in which a correspondent from one of the big networks was traveling with US troops. As it happened, a favored officer among the Americans was shot dead in an ensuing firefight with Taliban forces, and it was hard to not empathize with the soldier's distraught comrades. More to the point, this close view of combat seemed unusually rare for an American news broadcast, particularly considering how the war with Iraq has been going on since 2003.

So while the lack of a draft goes a long way in explaining the disconnection that most of us have from the war, the media and its coverage (or lack thereof) have also played a prominent role.

I was reminded of this while reading Scott MacKay's look back at 1968, a tumultous year in which TV brought Vietnam into people's living rooms, and, as MacKay writes, "in which 500 US soldiers were now losing their lives each week."

For Iraq, the counterpart to the famous photo above would be, who knows? -- perhaps some of the images from Abu Ghraib. Yet for most Americans, thanks to media shortcomings, Iraq has been a big instance of out of sight, out of mind.

  • joe bernstein said:

    The photo shown above is not depicting a war crime-Gen.Loan was executing a North Vietnamese regular army officer who had just committed multiple murders after having infiltrated Saigon in civilian clothes.Under the rules of war that type of activity is punishable by summary execution.The US forces in Europe executed German special ops troops dressed in civvies at the Battle of the Bulge and it was never questioned.The photographer who took the photo was distressed at its misuse by activists alleging a "war crime".Gen.Loan was brave officer who was subsequently wounded and partially paralyzed in the fighting in Saigon.He was Commander of the Vietnamese National Police.He later lived near Washington DC where he ran a pizza parlor until his death.
    April 7, 2008 2:57 AM
  • Ian said:

    Joe, my point in using this photo was that we got a lot more graphic imagery out of Vietnam than we have from Iraq.
    April 7, 2008 1:35 PM
  • joe bernstein said:

    Now believe it or not Ian,I fully agree with you on this.The coverage of the Iraq and Afghan campaigns has been bowdlerized to spare the public having to deal with the reality-this is shameful.War is a fucked up thing whether justified or adventurist.We don't even show flag-draped coffins,while in the Vietnam War the imagery in print and on television was graphic.It wasn't exaggerated-there is no way to exagerrate war.Serving in Vietnam made me realize a few things which I'll keep to myself- but i didn't become a pacifist at all- I think war is that last resort which you better be ready for the consequences of.The Bush administration treats the public like children on this issue.Maybe that's why there is a big disconnect between most Americans and this war.None of what I said should be construed to mean that we shouldn't be in Afghanistan-we have to;but Iraq is much more difficult to deal with.I don't think we should have gone in,but we are so deeply entrenched that it is no longer even physically possible to withdraw quickly.I wrote my previous entry to point out that General Loan was a man who put his body in the line of fire without a second thought,unlike despicable draft dodging cowards like Cheney,Perle,and Wolfowitz.
    April 7, 2008 4:32 PM
  • Ian said:

    Our agreeing on some things might not be as far-fetched as you think.
    April 7, 2008 7:07 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
ABOUT THIS BLOG
SUBSCRIBE




Sunday, July 05, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group