Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

re: Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

Chris Faraone — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:13:57 GMT

I'm staying out of this one, but you guys are hilarious. Keep it up.

re: Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

Steve — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:41:40 GMT

Looks like the Phoenix hasn't banned Scientologist IP addresses yet. Say whats up to Xenu for me Lauren.

P.S. nice grammar.

re: Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

Lauren — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:24:50 GMT

So with this article it's quite evident that you are not really reporting, because a reporter would be non-bias and just report the facts. You have not presented fact but only your opinion. The fact is that Wiki has been known to flag users and even organizations for editing information on Wikipedia. Most organizations try to edit miss information regarding their organization. Wikipedia rules are pretty vague. The Wiki police have always been known to make personal decisions when banning user or even a IP address.

This honestly seems one directional. We all know Wiki articles are not accurate. Most information within Wiki articles are incorrect. That is why comedy shows like 30 Rock make fun of Wikipedia. www.hulu.com/.../30-rock-wikipedia-prank

Let's please move on to a new topic because this is lame. Why is the new version of KKK (Anonymous) even listen too? You should write a post about how Anonymous. Is Anonymous the new cyber KKK?

re: Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

james — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:45:02 GMT

Hey jeff: I submit you wouldn't know gentle sarcasm - or Faraone's writing style - if you were severely bitten on the ass by it. Simmer down.

(Oh yeah: fuck Scientology.)

re: Scientology Back in the News - This Time Banned from Wikipedia

jeff — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:30:36 GMT

"believe it or not" wtf wtf?? The Church of Scientology has already been tried and convicted of wicki abuse which is why Wicki has thrown them out in unprecidented fashion. Yet, even after a trial and conviction, we are to either "believe it or not???" WTF?

Are we also to "believe or not" all the criminal convictions regarding scientology leaders? Why even report the "news" if you are going to avoid making any factual assertions simply out of fear? I submit that you are in the wrong line of work.