<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Q&amp;amp;A #4 -- Flaherty Makeover?</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2009/06/26/q-amp-a-4-flaherty-makeover.aspx</link><description>&amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot; asks: Michael Flaherty has gone through somewhat of a political makeover recently. He flipped his position on open government, the BU biolab, funding for street workers, charter schools, etc. Will he be able to reinvent himself successfully</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Q&amp;A #4 -- Flaherty Makeover?</title><link>http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2009/06/26/q-amp-a-4-flaherty-makeover.aspx#439781</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:40:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ad053fdd-4c7f-49f6-bf6d-6c53a7e614d5:439781</guid><dc:creator>BostonPatriot</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Flaherty is a member in good standing of the dominant Massachusetts political culture: Parasitical. His political fate is tied to that of public employee (parasites) unions. The notion that he is an agent of change (positive) is risible. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=439781" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>