The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Features  |  Reviews
FIND MOVIES
Find a Movie
Movie List
Loading ...
or
Find Theaters and Movie Times
or
Search Movies

Secrets and spies

Black Book ’s mismatched conventions
By PETER KEOUGH  |  April 11, 2007
3.0 3.0 Stars

Paul Verhoeven has made a brilliant study of the origins and consequences of Fascism. That film, of course, is Starship Troopers (1997). Black Book, a tale of espionage and resistance during the last days of the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands, is something else entirely. It’s a bit of a romantic comedy, with the traditional mistaken identity and pairing of opposites of that genre. It’s a hyper-emotional melodrama sparked with treacheries, illusions, revenge, and obsessive love. It’s a Hitchcockian suspense thriller without suspense. It’s a trash heap of enjoyable but absurd contrivances and mismatched conventions with glimmers of political and psychological insight. In short, it’s a Paul Verhoeven film, of the kind that’s been missed for a decade.

Verhoeven’s filmmaking return to his native Netherlands, two decades after his Hollywood debut with the outstanding RoboCop (1987) and seven years after the dismal failure of Hollow Man (2000), includes many of the juicy bits left out of Soldier of Orange (1977), his occasionally flaky and off-color but generally by-the-book adaptation of the war memoir of heroic Dutch resistance leader Erik Hazelhoff Roelfsema. It seems that while researching that film he and co-screenwriter Gerard Soeteman (who also co-scripted Book) came up with some material that did not fit into their mostly respectful homage. Whether that research culled up such nuggets as female Jewish spies dying their carpets to match the drapes (the detail that has most enamored critics of the movie) or buckets of shit dumped on collaborators by newly liberated drunken Dutch mobs (shades of Abu Ghraib) or the incessant phallic usage of handguns is unclear. I’m pretty sure, though, that they made up most of the plot twists in the wacky, implausible story.

It starts in 1956, with Rachel (saucy Carice Van Houten), a/k/a Ellis, teaching a primary-school class in a ramshackle Israeli kibbutz. (So much for suspense as to whether the heroine survives.) A chance encounter sends her to a quiet moment by the shore of a lake, the Sea of Galilee. Her shimmering reflection, that old warning sign of a pending flashback, just one of many corny devices Verhoeven indulges in, takes us back to “Holland 1944,” where Rachel, Anne Frank–style, holes up in an attic. When an Allied bomb puts the kibosh on that hiding place, Rachel must take her chances with the Resistance — which is a lot more dangerous but a lot more fun than eating grim meals and reciting New Testament passages for a pious Dutch family.

Her first contact leads her into a trap in which her family are massacred and she barely escapes. Disguised as a dead typhus victim, she’s smuggled to safety in a coffin and is thus truly initiated into the Underground. It’s a labyrinthine, shadowy, dysfunctional realm headed by patriarchal Gerben Kuipers (Derek de Lint), who’s joined by his son Tim (Ronald Armbrust) and the dashing Hans Akkermans (Thom Hoffman). Moved perhaps more by boredom than by vengeance (her job up to then has been boiling roots into soup), Rachel takes part in a mission with the sexy Akkermans that leads through various unlikely scenarios to her shacking up, freshly dyed and renamed Ellis, with Gestapo colonel Ludwig Müntze (Sebastian Koch).

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Are you Superbad?, You call that a muzzle?, The awful truth, More more >
  Topics: Reviews , Entertainment, Movies, Armed Forces,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: UP IN THE AIR  |  December 02, 2009
    No director pulls off the bait-and-switch as craftily as Jason Reitman. He gets you thinking that you're watching a hip, caustic comedy subverting the status quo, but by the end, he's vindicated all the platitudes he seemed to scorn.
  •   REVIEW: Z (1969)  |  December 01, 2009
    John F. Kennedy wasn't the only political leader murdered in 1963. On May 22 of that year, Gregoris Lambrakis, a left-leaning, pacifist member of the Greek parliament and an aspiring presidential candidate seeking to replace the reigning right-wing government, was assaulted after a peace rally in Thessaloniki. He died five days later.
  •   REVIEW: JULIA  |  December 02, 2009
    When the once-æthereal muse of the late Derek Jarman wiped sweat from her armpits in Michael Clayton , a new persona was born.
  •   REVIEW: THE STRIP  |  December 02, 2009
    In lieu of Steve Carell’s hopelessly inept and earnest manager, we have his creepier duplicate, Glenn. Instead of the boorish brown-noser played by Rainn Wilson, there’s the more obnoxious Rick.
  •   REVIEW: BAD LIEUTENANT: PORT OF CALL NEW ORLEANS  |  November 24, 2009
    Nicolas Cage is at his best in Bad Lieutenant

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group