The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
CD Reviews  |  Classical  |  Live Reviews  |  Music Features

Classical giants

James Levine’s Beethoven, Daniel Barenboim’s Mozart
By LLOYD SCHWARTZ  |  February 14, 2006

MOLTEN MOZART Barenboim revealed dramatic contrasts not only between phrases but also within phrases.Symphony Hall was packed for James Levine’s “all-Beethoven” concert, the latest installment in his ambitious Boston Symphony Orchestra Beethoven/Schoenberg series. (Even with the gorgeous pre-12-tone Pelleas und Melisande, will it be packed again for this weekend’s all-Schoenberg concert?) And the following night, courtesy of the Bank of America Celebrity Series, pianist/conductor Daniel Barenboim took over Symphony Hall with his Staatskapelle Berlin (an orchestra founded in 1570, though no one looked it) to conduct Mozart: the first two of his three last symphonies and, also playing, a piano concerto.

Levine’s Beethoven was another of his long programs: the enchanting Second Symphony (early Beethoven), the oddball Triple Concerto (middle Beethoven), and the masterful Seventh Symphony (late middle? early late?). The emphasis was on virtuosity. The antiphonal first and second violins, with a wonderful transparency of texture, made audible the written contrasts you can rarely hear when all the violins are on the same side.

In his program note, Levine explained that he was choosing works that demonstrated contrasts in Beethoven’s development, changes in musical language — here two symphonies with slow introductions and fundamental classical structure, but the early one filled with ideas “almost to bursting” and the later one “restricting his materials to the bare essentials.” We’ll get to hear a similar evolution in Schoenberg.

This Beethoven program chose exhilaration and speed over poetry. The Second Symphony begins Adagio molto, “very slow,” but Levine’s tempo was awfully brisk for an Adagio. The rest of the first movement teased us with expectations of tragedy and heroic resolution and gave us something in between. The enchanting Larghetto, though, unfolded a slow dance of ideas and delicate, gracious, almost Schubertian interludes. The Scherzo was teasing and playful. And the finale, Allegro molto, is in some ways this symphony’s high point of invention. Levine handled well the sudden slowdowns and ensuing eruptions.

Beethoven’s Triple Concerto, in which the “soloist” is a piano trio, is a big, enjoyable piece with a bad reputation. It seems to go on too long, and the attractive themes — so idiomatic, as Levine pointed out in his note, for their respective instruments (thrusting violin; warm, searching cello; broadly phrased piano) — don’t quite support Beethoven’s extended developments. But it’s a fascinating, anomalous piece. The last BSO subscription performance was nine years ago, so I was glad to hear it again. It begins with a masterstroke, a mysterious rumble that then opens out into something vigorous, public, almost ceremonial. The slow movement is a kind of passageway into the Polish rondo, a lively dance with the best tune in the piece.

Each movement begins with the cello, which has the most difficult music. Ralph Kirshbaum played with warmth but also with a strangely hollow, almost disembodied tone and (to my ear) occasionally questionable intonation. Violinist Miriam Fried provided the oomph, rhythmic dynamism embodied in a tightly focused tone, all line where the cello was all texture. The pianist was Fried’s son, Jonathan Biss, who gets better each time I hear him. After a slightly unsettled start, he played with imposing authority, and on a grand scale.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Transfigured nights, Boston feasts, From Knoxville to Swan Lake and back, More more >
  Topics: Music Features , Entertainment, Music, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Classical giants
In regards to Mr. Shwartz's comments on the 2nd Symphony, molto adagio does not mean "very slow" either in Italian or in music. Yes, composers of the 19th century did start to use this marking to denote a slow tempo, often in the context of tragic/sad music. However, there exists plenty of evidence to suggest that in Mozart and, most certainly, early Beethoven molto adagio can be read (literally) as "very much at ease," i.e. "at a comfortably flowing tempo"
By MusicSmith on 02/16/2006 at 1:24:19
Classical giants
Mr Schwartz is so right about Levine's reading of Beethoven 7. Levine has refurbished the machine- the BSO has never sounded better (the Bot Symphony Orchestra?), now what will he do with it? Let's hope his mechanical sounding 7th isn't the future, all brightness and over-speed.This was symphony as opera overture, Beethoven as Rossini, and in fact, the worst performance, at an aesthetic level, I've ever heard by a major orchestra. Schwartz is only wrong in being too kind.
By Paul on 02/17/2006 at 8:37:59
Classical giants
I suspect that MusicSmith’s categorical assertion that the standard definition of the term “molto Adagio” is not “very slow” would come as a surprise to most composers, performers, scholars, music lovers, and Italian speakers. According to Grove’s Musical Dictionary, the Oxford dictionary, and my Italian dictionary (which suggests that the root meaning of “Adagio” has to do with lying down), the term meant slow as far back as the early 17th century. Apparently, some people have been arguing that during the 18th century, the term was used to mean at an easy pace. But in my own experience, the greatest performances of movements or musical passages marked Adagio have been searchingly slow rather than leisurely. I think it’s terrific that readers of the Phoenix care enough about such matters to write a letter. Lloyd Schwartz (with a “c”)
By LS on 02/17/2006 at 5:16:15
Classical giants
Worth mentioning perhaps that the composer's metronome mark is eighth=82 for this "molto adagio" (a mark this conductor observes spot-on).
By Ken on 02/18/2006 at 9:57:04
Classical giants
Sorry, that was a typo for "84".
By Ken on 02/18/2006 at 10:01:32

[ 11/23 ]   Rebecca Cline Ensemble  @ Recital Hall 1W
[ 11/23 ]   Sunshine Riot  @ O’Brien’s
[ 11/23 ]   "Night of the Living Dead Head"  @ Zuzu
[ 11/23 ]   Open Jam Night  @ Dodge Street Bar & Grill
[ 11/23 ]   Tufts Flute Ensemble  @ Tufts University Granoff Music Center
ARTICLES BY LLOYD SCHWARTZ
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   CREATIONISTS  |  November 18, 2009
    Simon Rattle and the BPO, Fabio Luisi and the BSO, John Harbison and Emmanuel Music
  •   ALMOST  |  November 12, 2009
    The Boston Lyric Opera comes maddeningly close to having a good Carmen . (The production continues at the Shubert Theatre through November 17.) Keith Lockhart leads a superb orchestra and chorus and a cast of plausible singers/actors in a compelling if not spine-tingling performance.
  •   BLESSINGS: MIXED AND OTHERWISE  |  October 28, 2009
    By odd coincidence, in recent weeks we’ve had performances of two important operatic rarities, landmark early works a century apart: 30-year-old Handel’s Amadigi (1715) and 20-year-old Rossini’s Tancredi (1813, his 10th opera!).
  •   IN THE SWIM  |  October 14, 2009
    My head’s swimming.
  •   THE ROAR OF THE CROWD  |  October 13, 2009
    I wasn’t there, but the opening-night dissatisfaction with the Met’s new Tosca was widely reported.

 See all articles by: LLOYD SCHWARTZ

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group