The new consensus

Don’t be fooled by the friction. By and large, the Massachusetts House and Senate are on the same ideological page.
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 14, 2006

Can’t the Massachusetts House and Senate just get along?

As legislative business wound down in 2005, the buzz on Beacon Hill had Senate president Robert Travaglini (D-Boston) and his colleagues growing frustrated with the slow pace set by Travaglini’s House counterpart, Speaker Sal DiMasi (D-Boston). And while the new year is still young, there are fresh signs of friction, especially in the debate over how to extend health care to the state’s uninsured. DiMasi wants to impose an employer mandate, which would tax employers who don’t cover their workers. But Travaglini, along with Governor Mitt Romney, thinks such a step would be economically foolhardy.

BONHOMIE: Both Sal DiMasi and Robert Travaglini logged time as majority whips in the House and Senate, respectively, positions that put a premium on schmoozing.The battle seems to be escalating. Just last week, three key senators — Richard Moore, co-chair of the Joint Committee on Health Care financing; Senate Ways and Means chair Therese Murray; and Minority Leader Brian Lees — pointedly questioned the House’s approach in a letter released to the media. It was a striking show of brinksmanship, and a possible sign that things are about to get ugly.

Unless, of course, they don’t. Yes, relations between the Senate and House appear to be somewhat tense, especially with health care dominating the legislative agenda. But the fact remains that, more than at any other point in recent memory, the Massachusetts House and Senate share a common vision for state government. The old model for legislative relations — in which the conservative House acted as a fiscal and social brake on the more liberal Senate — is fast becoming obsolete. Instead, the two chambers seem broadly united by a kind of pragmatic progressive ethos. Consider the following:

The Cultural Facilities Fund is about to become a reality. First proposed by Speaker DiMasi when the House’s economic-stimulus package was released last August, the fund would direct $500 million into the state’s artistic and cultural organizations over the next decade, using a mixture of public and private funds, and without incurring any new cost to taxpayers (See "A Bold Proposal," Editorial, August 5, 2005). The Senate’s economic-stimulus plan, which was released later in the fall, includes a Cultural Facilities Fund proposal that is virtually indistinguishable from that put forward by the House.

Much work still needs to be done to reconcile the Senate’s stimulus package, which totals nearly $500 million, with the House’s, which has a relatively modest $336 million price tag. Barring a shocking last-minute twist, however, the Cultural Facilities Fund will be part of whatever package the legislature sends to Governor Romney later this year.

Syringe legalization is moving forward. Massachusetts is currently one of just three states in which syringes aren’t available for over-the-counter purchase at pharmacies, a situation that has helped make HIV and hepatitis-infection rates higher than they might otherwise be (See " Sticking point ," November 11, 2005). Efforts to change the status quo went nowhere when Tom Finneran, a staunch social conservative, ran the House. But last November, the House approved a bill that would legalize syringe sales and decriminalize syringe possession in a lopsided 115-37 vote.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Power hungry?, DiMasi’s sheep, Imagine all the Democrats, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney, Salvatore DiMasi, U.S. Government,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY