The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
50_bands_50_States_2009_banner

Survivor: Worcester

Who’s at risk in the Democratic race for governor?
By ADAM REILLY  |  May 30, 2006

060526_politics_main1
WHO'S FEELING LUCKY?: Will all three Democratic candidates for Massachusetts governor survive their party’s June convention? And should they?

It’s the question of the moment in state politics: when the Massachusetts Democratic Party wraps up its 2006 convention on June 3, will all three Democratic candidates for governor still be standing?

One thing is clear: Deval Patrick won’t be in any kind of danger at the Democrats’ Worcester confab, where they’ll endorse one candidate and formalize the party’s primary ballot. The former Clinton-administration official scored a huge victory at the party’s caucuses in February, and he looks like a sure thing for the endorsement. But the picture is murkier for Patrick’s two competitors, Attorney General Tom Reilly and venture capitalist–civic do-gooder Chris Gabrieli.

Let’s start with Reilly. As Democratic-caucus results trickled in earlier this year, one rumor had the AG hovering dangerously close to the 15 percent mark. (At this year’s convention, if 15 percent of delegates don’t vote for a candidate on the first ballot, that candidate is done. Finished. Kaput. To get the convention’s endorsement, a candidate needs to hit 50 percent plus one delegate.) The Reilly camp insisted it had reached that threshold, but it never offered any hard numbers. Then there’s Gabrieli, whose position looks even shakier. Since Chris the Good didn’t decide to run until after the caucuses, getting to 15 percent won’t be easy: he’ll need some undecided delegates, a handful of apostates, and a boatload of “add-ons,” a group that includes elected officials and members of underrepresented groups (minorities, the handicapped, and so on).

Last week, after a debate featuring the three Democrats and the independent Christy Mihos, NECN’s Chet Curtis noted that Patrick could be the only candidate to make it out of Worcester. It’s an unlikely scenario but not entirely far-fetched. Suppose Patrick nabbed 75 percent of the delegates at the February caucuses, with 20 percent going for Reilly and 5 percent undecided. (The official results have been closely guarded by the Mass Dems.) If Patrick stays above the 70 percent mark once the add-ons get thrown in, Gabrieli and Reilly could end up fighting for the remaining 29 or 28 percent, with an even split bringing both campaigns to a screeching halt.

Dramatically speaking, it would be a hell of an outcome. Still, none of the seasoned political observers who spoke with the Phoenix seems to think Reilly will be seriously at risk in Worcester. “Reilly has the institutional players, and those folks are not budging,” says one Democratic insider, referring to the AG’s support from elected officials, such as Boston mayor Tom Menino. “And Reilly’s not spending a dime on the convention — he’s saving his money. He just wants to get 15 percent, and he’ll go home.”

Gabrieli should be so lucky. Thanks to a $2 million ad blitz that’s made him a ubiquitous (some would say inescapable) presence on local TV, Gabrieli’s poll numbers have been impressive lately. But while this should help him convince some delegates that he deserves a spot on the primary ballot, it may not be enough to help him reach 15 percent. So, he’s trying guilt! Last week, a letter signed by 19 Democratic legislators (including supporters of all three Democratic candidates) and mailed to delegates by the Gabrieli campaign argued that, if Gabrieli doesn’t advance to the primary, a great wrong will have been done. Here’s the reasoning:

“As Democrats, we have always been the Party of inclusion. We are the Party that defended the right to vote. We are the Party that pursues opportunity for all. We have always been the Party with the big umbrella.... We believe that to keep any of the democratic [sic] candidates off the ballot in September would be abandoning our cherished principles. We would be damaging the reputation of our Party heading into the November elections.”

Easy there, folks. Gabrieli may well turn out to be the strongest Democratic candidate. But it’s quite a stretch to cast him as a political martyr in waiting, with those who’d keep him off the ballot acting as political Bull Connors.

Let’s review, shall we? Chris, you’re a dauntingly wealthy political veteran who entered the race late, after Tom Reilly spurned you and picked another running mate. What’s more, the 15 percent rule was already in place when you made your decision. Whining (or letting your surrogates whine) about a situation in which you’ve freely placed yourself is self-indulgent, and it won’t win you any style points. Furthermore, everyone knows that Patrick’s candidacy started sputtering when you got in the race. If you’re going to ask his supporters to help you move on to the next round — where, to state the obvious, you’d try to squash Patrick like a bug — try making your case on the merits. Don’t play the victim card.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: The Dems are coming, Shadow of a doubt, Enter the wonk, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Deval Patrick, Cyndi Roy,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Survivor: Worcester
I am a District coordinator for Deval Patrick, one of the Democratic candidates for Governorof MA. I got seriously involved in politics about a year and half ago because I could no longer watch one political party destroying our country while the other political party stood there frozen in fear. I am a registered member of the chicken political party. I received a letter signed by two state senators and seventeen state representatives titled in bold letters "A Message from Democratic Elected Officials" In a nutshell it’s message is that no matter what Democratic gubernatorial candidate you support as a delegate to the convention next month for governor they all deserve to be on the primary ballet in September, that to allow this not to happen would be to abandon our cherished Democratic party principles; we would be damaging the reputation of our Party heading into the November election. The letter appears at face value honorable. That is before you look at the lower left hand corner and you read in the smallest wording on the page "Paid for and authorized by the Gabrieli Committee" Then on the upper right you see www.gabrieli.org. What angers me is this letter could have simply--and honorably--said that we the undersigned support Chris Gabrieli and we hope you will vote to let him on the ballot in September. Instead what they tried to do was make this appear to be a coalition of Democratic Officials who all support different gubernatorial candidates. This was sleazy and dishonest. I even called Gabrieli's campaign and spoke with a young woman I have great respect for. I cannot quote her exact words, but the gist of them was 'we will get him on the ballot by hook or by crook'. I am proud to be a registered Democrat and despite the fact that I am deeply disappointed by the actions of many of my representatives in the House and the Senate for the past 6 years, I remain proud to be one. People that operate like this dishonor our political party. They make us no better or different than the party we want to defeat. We can do better than this. Chris Gabrieli and the elected officials who took part in this shame us all by resorting to these tactics.
By Southcoast Dem on 05/26/2006 at 1:43:02

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TWEET-FIGHTING MAN  |  June 24, 2009
    To what extent did social media shape Iran's so-called Twitter Revolution?
  •   WEAKENED WATCHDOGS  |  June 19, 2009
    If the Globe shrinks, will Beacon Hill run amok?
  •   THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.'S BAFFLING GLOBE STRATEGY  |  June 10, 2009
    The Times Co. actually seems intent on not getting to yes with Guild members
  •   THE BLESSING OF ABORTION  |  June 12, 2009
    Pro-choice provocateur: Meet Cambridge divinity dean Katherine Ragsdale
  •   TRANS FACT  |  May 20, 2009
    When a person in the center of a media maelstrom has had a sex change, is it fair game for the press?

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group