The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Wet, hot American summer

By MIKE MILIARD  |  June 2, 2006

Cutting through Quincy Market, which is, surprisingly, still crowded with a goodly number of tourists, you make your way to the waterfront and find a seat on a bench. The warm salt water plashes gently against the side of the Custom House Tower. Looking out at the tiny planes, waiting patiently in the eternal gridlock at New Logan across the harbor, you almost doze off in the torpid warmth, watching the sunlight play on the water. Slowly, the quality of light changes. You look up as a gray thunderhead drifts in and enshrouds the sun, and it starts to pour.

060602_global_main01

We just had a taste
In May 2006, it rained for days and days. Biblical, Noah’s-ark rain. Sustained heavy showers, punctuated by drenching cloudbursts. Rain that gorged rivers and streams, collecting in small lakes on the streets. Rain that submerged parking lots and playgrounds on the North Shore and in Merrimack Valley. These scenes could have just as easily come from New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward. The flooding affected 14,000 homes in 40 communities. Total damage could approach $100 million.

Get used to it.

Strange and extreme spells of weather like what we saw in May are “right in line with what the models are predicting,” says Paul Kirshen, a research professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Tufts’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Kirshen was the project director of an exhaustive study, Climate’s Long-Term Impacts on Metro Boston (CLIMB), that tried to assess the costs global warming might exact during the next century.

Four years in the making and commissioned by the Environmental Protection Agency to the tune of almost $1 million, CLIMB was the first study of the effects of global warming on a metropolitan urban area. “When people started talking about climate change in the late ’80s, mid ’90s, they focused on things like agriculture, fisheries, water supply,” says Kirshen. “Everyone said you didn’t have to worry too much about the cities. But it turns out all the infrastructure that makes city life possible depends very much on climate. Buildings are designed for certain temperatures, so they need to be cooled and heated correctly. Water-supply systems are designed for so much ground-water availability. Health systems are very climate sensitive. Infrastructure is very sensitive to climate.”

Here in Boston, we have much more than heavy rains to worry about. By 2100, the metro-Boston area can expect a six-to-10-degree-Fahrenheit rise in average temperature, according to CLIMB’s findings. Sea levels could be as much as a meter higher; heavy rains like what we had in May would cause much more extensive flooding. The city’s 100-year-old sewer systems — which by then would be 200 years old — could make for big messes. In outlying areas, wetlands and estuaries could be damaged irrevocably. With more than 30 days a year exceeding 90 degrees, energy demands could skyrocket as more and more people tried to stay cool in the summer. There will be more air pollution. There will be more health problems, resulting from higher temperatures and from disease borne by exploding bug populations. Depending on the severity of the weather, the price tag for the havoc wrought on infrastructure and for emergency services could approach $100 billion.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |   next >
Related: The End of the Long Summer, Which way the wind blows, Letters to the Editor: August 28, 2009, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Mitt Romney, Science and Technology, Microbiology,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Wet, hot American summer
Lindzen's stand against the global warming scientific "consensus" bothers me in several points: (1) The title of his WSJ op-ed was "Climate of Fear" and the theme / main idea as well as this title are very nearly plagiarized from Michael Crichton's novel "State of Fear"; (2) He spoke briefly at a 2005 Tufts conference on Oil and Water in much the same manner as the Phoenix interview: making extremely few factual claims, saying we were overreacting, and contesting the issue via one factoid out of context. What are we to make of his comment that we're only 0.6 degree warmer over the past century, when in fact this is against a background of a cooling trend, our CO2 is higher than it has been in some 650,000 years, and records of temperature and CO2 concentrations over that same time period correlate CO2 with temperature? And (3) I have never heard a word from Lindzen connecting science with public policy: the climate-change-consensus scientists are not asking for a radical policy to make unprecedented changes to the atmosphere; in contrast, they want us to simply slow down. Continuing to increase CO2 far beyond historical limits seems to me to be an extremely radical (even insane) idea. Lindzen seems to feel that public policy should support this - although he never says so. And if that is what he recommends, why? Given all this, I do not understand why anyone should play his stupid game of intellectual hide-and-seek.
By retry on 06/04/2006 at 4:06:24

ARTICLES BY MIKE MILIARD
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   PHOENIX CRITIC WINS GRANT  |  December 02, 2009
    It was announced earlier this week that Phoenix contributing writer Greg Cook's art blog, the New England Journal of Aesthetic Research, has been awarded a $30,000 endowment from the Creative Capital/Warhol Foundation Arts Writers Grant Program, which rewards "commitment to the craft of writing and the advancement of critical discourse on contemporary visual art."
  •   REVIEW: STRONGMAN  |  December 03, 2009
    Stanley “Stanless Steel” Pleskun is a lumbering, mumbling tree of a man.
  •   GLENN BECK'S UNHINGED SWEATER SAGA  |  November 24, 2009
    Hello, America. A special Glenn Beck Program tonight: I'm speaking to you from somewhere in the North Pole, and let me tell you [adopts cartoonish yokel voice with rubbery exaggerated shiver] it is coooooooold up here.
  •   WE'RE KILLING THE OCEANS  |  November 18, 2009
    I meet world-renowned undersea photojournalist Brian Skerry at Legal Seafoods, across from the New England Aquarium, where he's the explorer in residence. He orders a chicken Caesar salad.
  •   REVISITING THE GREATEST HARVARD-YALE GAME  |  November 18, 2009
    It takes some doing to make Harvard look like an underdog in anything. But Harvard Beats Yale, 29-29 — Kevin Rafferty's 2008 movie (out now on DVD) and new book (released this past month) about the famous football rivalry — does just that.

 See all articles by: MIKE MILIARD

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group