The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Libbing it up

By MICHAEL BRONSKI  |  June 13, 2006

Despite these problems, the Gay Liberation Front never believed in strict identity politics or a zero-sum game. Rather than seeing human and civil rights as identity-specific, it understood that if everyone worked together, there would be no losers. The GLF also believed that truly productive political work could only occur when the full needs of all people — economic, health, safety, housing, spiritual, and sexual — were addressed and met. And most important, it believed that cohesive social change could only come through cooperation, and that no one is free until all are free. This vision of justice, as espoused by the prophet Isaiah, is found in the Hebrew Bible, in the Enlightenment, and (if you are not an originalist) in the Constitution of the United States.

Luckily, there are signs that changes are under way. When lesbian commentator Jasmin Cannick recently argued on her blog that the rights of native-born gay men and lesbians were more important than those of illegal immigrants, she was soundly criticized by other gay activists. Over the past year, lesbian activist and civil-rights lawyer Chai Feldbaum has argued, persuasively, that instead of hiding behind the slogan “gay people are just like everyone else,” homosexuals should acknowledge these differences. The best argument for same-sex marriage, she says, is that “gay sex is good.” Even Matt Foreman, the executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, spoke in the human-rights idiom of gay liberation when he told Bay Windows in January, “There is still a question of our fundamental humanity and equality. Either we’re fully equal and fully human or we are not. There is no other way to frame it.”

Foreman’s radical recasting of gay politics, coming from a national gay-rights spokesperson, is welcome — even if it is more than three decades late. But if gay politics is going to survive and prosper as it faces increasingly intense pressure over the next few years, it will have to continue committing itself to just such a new vision of openness, self-respect, and fairness — for all.

On the Web
The Women's Liberation and Gay Liberation Movements: http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/newtonq.html

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
Related: Courthouse marriage, Equal rites?, Queer eye for the Hawkeyes, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Politics, Culture and Lifestyle, Human Rights Campaign,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

Today's Event Picks
More Information

Five things a retrofitted gay-lib movement should do
1) Rather than simply the fight for marriage rights, the gay movement should work with a wide array of groups to ensure that all families — married and non-traditional — will have the economic and social support to be healthy and happy. This could mean anything from working on programs that would train at-home parents for gainful employment, to establishing new tax codes that would reflect the reality of non-coupled families and blood relatives who live together.

2) Gay organizations should collaborate with workers’-rights groups on issues such as comprehensive child-friendly work leave; domestic-partnership rights for straight couples, gay couples, and households of people who are not sexually involved; and greater employee participation, profit sharing, and company management.

3) While always insisting on a strict separation of church and state, gay organizations should work with faith-based groups on economic and social issues in which they are both invested. Working with black churches to preserve federal poverty programs or with the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to oppose capital punishment would create points of social and political contact on which both could build.

4) The gay movement should form alliances on comprehensive-health-care issues — including access to all forms of birth control, pre- and postnatal care, revamped Medicare and Medicaid, sexual-health education, and functional (i.e., non-abstinence-based) AIDS prevention.

5) It should urge and support gay and lesbian people to become involved in their immediate communities. Openly gay people serving on school committees, zoning boards, urban-planning committees, crime-watch groups, local diversity-training groups, and social programs such as Meals on Wheels will not only ensure a high degree of queer visibility, but will ensure that issues of specific importance to gay men and lesbians are discussed.

ARTICLES BY MICHAEL BRONSKI
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GAY OLD TIME  |  May 30, 2007
    Many people take for granted that the divide between gay culture and mainstream culture is as thin as the latex of an expensive condom.
  •   DEADLY ART  |  April 10, 2007
    It’s tempting to see two new biographies of Leni Riefenstahl and assume they’ll push the envelope, and expose the dirt about her personal life.
  •   MAJOR EMBARRASSMENT?  |  March 16, 2007
    Matt Sanchez was a darling of the conservative media establishment, but then news broke that he was, only a few years ago, performing in famous gay porn films.
  •   OBSERVING GLOBAL ORGASM DAY  |  December 20, 2006
    Sure, everyone looks forward to winter solstice because we know that after weeks of dreary darkness, they days will get longer and brighter.
  •   THE RHODA REACTION  |  December 20, 2006
    what are the causes of evil and how do we eradicate it — or at least keep it in abeyance?

 See all articles by: MICHAEL BRONSKI

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group