Some days you eat the bear

By AL DIAMON  |  June 20, 2013

Trahan claims the society is prepared to spend $3 million on its anti-baiting campaign, a figure his feeble little group (13,000 dues- paying members and an unblemished record of slamming down any gun-control bill or limitation on hunting) could never match. The society, he claimed, "raises money from all over the world and then uses the money to stop hunting in small, poor states such as Maine."

I've heard stupider arguments for amending the Constitution — but not many.

The state's citizen initiative process is designed to act as a check on government power. It's been used to do what politicians didn't dare (getting rid of the big box ballot, legalizing same-sex marriage) and to block government from doing what it shouldn't (tax hikes in the guise of tax reform, the Uniform Property Tax). It's been successful (saving Bigelow Mountain, approving casinos) and unsuccessful (trying to manage forestry practices, trying to force the state to pay 55 percent of local school costs). It's been smart (passing a bottle-return law, allowing medical marijuana) and stupid (approving term limits, outlawing local measured phone service). And it ought to continue to provide voters a direct voice, whether it's about lifting the ban on recreational pot or imposing an animal-rights agenda on wildlife management.

Trahan has called on the Second Amendment so often to defend gun owners' rights that he seems to have forgotten how to argue against bad ideas without some constitutional backup. But bearing arms is not the same as hunting bears.

Defeating the Humane Society requires no meddling with fundamental law, but rather rational arguments, common sense — and a reminder about where proper restrooms for bears belong.

Unload on me by emailing aldiamon@herniahill.net.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY AL DIAMON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   ALL THE WRONG CHOICES  |  July 07, 2014
    Reform is in the air. Olympia Snowe and the Portland Press Herald are calling for changes in the way we elect our leaders in order to restore public confidence, end gridlock, and reverse global warming. There’s a much better chance they’ll accomplish that last one than either of the other two.  
  •   INSIDE GAME  |  June 25, 2014
    The university system’s decision to add Demeritt to its roster at a salary of $125,000 a year generated criticism because it was done by ignoring normal hiring procedures and came at a time when the system is facing budget shortfalls, program cuts, and layoffs. Demeritt is going to have to hit a lot of three-pointers to make up for all that negative reaction.
  •   WHICH WAY DO I TURN?  |  June 18, 2014
    Bruce Poliquin has a big problem.
  •   ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS  |  June 11, 2014
    LePage would prefer you withhold judgment on those actions that didn’t work out quite the way he planned. Or, possibly, didn’t plan.
  •   THE OLD SWITCHEROO  |  June 06, 2014
    Flipping one incompetent LePage minion for another might work to solve a variety of heretofore insurmountable problems.

 See all articles by: AL DIAMON