The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Who’s the real Dem?

By ADAM REILLY  |  July 6, 2006

Fair enough. Factor in the native-son element — Lynch grew up in Southie and represented the area as a state senator; Dunkelbarger hails from New York, and lived on the North Shore before moving into the Ninth District — and it’s clear the stars aren’t aligned in the challenger’s favor.

That said, Dunkelbarger has also been hurt by his own shortsightedness. Lamont made a buzz in Connecticut largely by mobilizing local and national political blogs on his behalf, and by reaching out to progressive Democratic organizations like Democracy for America (DFA). In contrast, Dunkelbarger hasn’t even contacted the Boston chapter of DFA to solicit its endorsement — and his candidacy has essentially gone unmentioned in the increasingly robust liberal blogosphere here in Massachusetts. It’s a strange blind spot for a candidate who comports himself with aggressive confidence. When I mention it to Dunkelbarger, he sounds almost apologetic. “It’s definitely something we’re aware of,” he says. “I’ve got to admit to you, I’m 57 years old, and the blogging. . . . I know how to use the Internet and computers and so forth, but blogging is not something in which I’m experienced.”

Over the next month, Dunkelbarger promises, his campaign will take a great leap forward, technologically speaking. By then, of course, it may be too late. All the ingredients for a substantive internecine fight are present — but right now, the great Dunkelbarger-Lynch battle of ’06 may never occur.

Then again, it might. Democrats, especially liberal Democrats, are in high dudgeon this election year. If Dunkelbarger could create, say, a canny campaign video or two, the progressive infrastructure that’s grown up around the Internet could turn him into a left-liberal celebrity overnight. This, in turn, could force Lynch to play defense on Iraq — and that would be no easy task. At the very least, Dunkelbarger still has the chance to force Lynch into a debate about what it means to be a Democrat today. And win or lose, this would be a good thing for Massachusetts.

On the Web
Adam Reilly's Talking Politics blog: http://www.thephoenix.com/talkingpolitics
Phil Dunkelbarger: http://www.dunkelbargerdemocrat.org/
Stephen Lynch: http://www.house.gov/lynch/
Ned Lamont: http://nedlamont.com/

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
Related: The First Annual Spotty Awards, Financial fallout, Giant shadow, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Election Campaigns, Stephen Lynch, Stephen Lynch,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Who’s the real Dem?
Very fair article. I would balance the "democratic observer's" characterization of the District, however, with the following facts: Lynch originally won the seat in a multi-candidate, Special Election with only 39% of the vote. The two candidates who finished second and third, both "left of center" Democrats, received 45% of the vote between them. In addition, there has been a significant demographic shift, over the past four years, in the make up of those neighborhoods referenced as Lynch's base (some say Southie alone has turned over more than 50%, as rising real estate values have transitioned lifelong Southie families to the Boston suburbs and New Hampshire). Also, as reported, Lynch has recently been whining about how he was misled on the war and that, "if I knew then what I know now, I wouldn't have voted for it." This is a lie. As recently as March of 2005, Lynch made the following statement: "I did support the decision to use military force in Iraq, not because it was a move to democracy or a hunt for weapons of mass destruction, but to remove Saddam Hussein from power." Now that it is clear what a huge mistake he made, with such catastrophic consequences, he would like to duck responsibility for his actions by claiming he's just a victim.
By Phil Dunkelbarger on 07/06/2006 at 2:51:00
Who’s the real Dem?
Lynch says. “Well, if I had the information we have now, I would have voted differently..." What information is Lynch talking about? Lynch's stated reasons for going to war were to get rid of Saddam Hussein, based on that ill-concieved notion what possible information in his posession now would change his thinking? Likening Lynch's record to Barney Franks is laughable. They are diametrically opposed on Choice, equal Marriage rights, privacy, the occupation of Iraq. To alledge that all votes carry equal weight is to take the voters of the 9th district for fools.
By Dunkdem1957 on 07/06/2006 at 9:55:42
Who’s the real Dem?
As the coordinator of South of Boston DFA, I have to disagree that Phil has not tried to get the endorsement of DFA. He has been endorsed by our group and has his campaign information up on DFA-Link. The mysterious process that results in becoming endorsed by the national Democracy for America organization is unknown to me and I have been the host of the South of Boston group since we were Dean for America. By the way, Phil was one of the early Dean supporters and even travelled to NH for Dean events. He has always held the same fiscally responsible, socially progressive beliefs and saw that the war was wrong in real time, not hindsight.
By Jan A on 07/06/2006 at 12:23:06
Who’s the real Dem?
Lynch's contention that he's a critic of the war is laughable. If Lynch has not been identified as a Bush accomplice, let me fix that now. There have been twleve significant votes in the House -- opportunities for Democrats to voice their opposition to the War: Lynch chose NOT to support the Murtha Bill or the McGovern Bill. Of the remaining ten votes, he voted with the Republicans six out of the ten -- he voted with his fellow Democrat (Frank) only four of twelve times. His record on Iraq is by far the worst of any rep in the Commonwealth; note the following specific votes: Frank : 12/12 Delahunt : 11/12 McGovern : 11/12 Meehan : 10/12 Olver : 9/12 Markey : 9/12 Tierney : 8/12 Capuano : 7/12 Neal : 7/12 Lynch : 4/12 The votes are for: OOI Caucus, HCR 35, Woosley Amd, HJR 55, HR 551, HCR 197, HR 3142, HR 612, HR 4232, HJR 73, and HR 861. I sure hope Adam Reilly is wrong; this can't be tilting at windmills. A system in which people with strong ideas run for elected office is called something else: it's called a "democracy". But I should thank him and The Phoenix for helping get the word out. Lynch is part of the problem -- the only part of the problem that I can vote to fix. Dunkelbarger is spot on; Lynch has got to go.
By winchou on 07/06/2006 at 7:51:27
Who’s the real Dem?
The Iraq War IS the defining issue, because it’s the tip of the iceberg containing all the other crucial issues: the power grabs of 2000, 2002, 2004; the transformation of the 9/11 attack into a worldwide Cold War; the collapse of the Democratic party as an effective opposition; the loss of civil liberties; the end of government accountability; you could go on and on. The cowardice and aloof professionalism of the Democratic Party in the face of this ongoing crisis is what’s driving people to despair. Every campaign that tilts the balance of power back to normal matters. Here in the 9th District we have a chance to do something concrete, and elect a congressman who actually speaks intelligently about political realities. The fact that we only have an outside chance of doing so shows how decadent our democracy has become.
By ReadyToRock on 07/07/2006 at 10:21:15
Who’s the real Dem?
As a Democratic activist, who worked for Dean and Kerry, as well as financially supports the Fightin Dems and ned Lamont, I would LOVE to work for Phil, if I knew anything about him I have been contacted only once by a petulant Phil, who shoots himself in the foot by alienating the very people he should be wooing. I know nothing about his background, and well know the history of voters running toward people they know nothing of to escape rascals they do. I despise Lynch, and find him contemptuous as a Pied Piper of Death speaking out for the recruitment of our children in the dance to death in Iraq. He is a hack, ignorant and panders to the worst in people. He represents the most ignorant of our Ma. voters. Tell Phil to get me a list of what he stands FOR, and where he comes from and I would be happy to help him.
By patriotic pilgrim on 07/07/2006 at 11:01:38
Who’s the real Dem?
Who's The Real Dem? Adam Reilly's title says it all, we shouldn't have to ask. Lapdog Lynch is just another rubber-stamp for the Bush agenda. He supports Republican policies and voted "Stay the Course" H.R.861, against all the other MA delegation. The Democratic platform supports a woman's right to choose, as does Phil Dunkelbarger. Lynch does not support women's rights. I'm fed up with Lynch's incompetent record. The 9th District needs Phil Dunkelbanger, a real Dem.
By Linda H. on 07/09/2006 at 8:44:55
Who’s the real Dem?
Lieberman-Lamomt primary is in August, not September.
By reader on the train on 07/23/2006 at 4:28:28

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GREG EPSTEIN, ATHEIST SUPERSTAR  |  November 24, 2009
    Once an intellectual taboo, atheism has become one of the great growth industries of the third millennium.
  •   UNMAKING A BAD FEDERAL LAW  |  November 24, 2009
    It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.
  •   THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING ERNIE  |  October 19, 2009
    Media feuds don’t come any nastier than the metastasizing spat between Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr and one “Ernie Boch III,” the pseudonymous blogger at the liberal Web site Blue Mass. Group. (Note: the blogger is no relation to the car dealer.)

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group