The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

High Noon for Cabral

Freedom watch
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  January 25, 2006

Suffolk County Sheriff Andrea J. CabralMixed messages marked a civil jury’s verdict last week ordering Suffolk County Sheriff Andrea J. Cabral’s office to pay fired nurse Sheila Porter $360,000 in compensation plus an additional $250,000 in “punitive damages.” The sheriff, as readers of this space will recall (see “Cabral’s Sharp Aim,” News and Features, December 16), had barred Porter from the Suffolk County House of Correction as a result of either her failure to properly document injuries received by an inmate from guard brutality (if one believes Cabral) or her having acted as an informant for the FBI, which had been investigating such brutality (if one believes Porter).

The verdict in Porter’s favor vindicated the 62-year-old nurse’s claim for wrongful termination. Nonetheless, it also appears to have vindicated the decision by the US Attorney’s office (reported prior to the civil trial and explained in our December 16 analysis) to drop a criminal investigation into whether the sheriff violated a federal whistle-blower-protection law by firing Porter. The Boston Globe’s Shelley Murphy interviewed one juror who said that while the jury was upset with the Sheriff’s Department for firing Porter, “we didn’t want to crucify Andrea, because she’s doing a good job.” Presumably the juror was referring to Cabral’s announced effort, upon taking office after an upset election, to root out the deeply entrenched culture of brutality toward inmates that characterized the regimes of some of her predecessors — the same goal Porter claimed was her motive for cooperating with the feds.

The US Attorney’s decision not to prosecute — “crucify,” in the juror’s words — Cabral thus appeared to be a wise one, even if arrived at with reluctance. The matter was obviously a civil dispute that should never have been allowed to escalate into a threat of criminal prosecution by the overly sensitive and often power-hungry feds who believed Cabral showed insufficient deference to their informant. Rough justice appears to have been done all around.

Related: Truth, Justice — or the Boston Way, White-supremacist code printed nationwide, After Innocence, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Criminal Sentencing and Punishment, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Prisons,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FREE SPEECH AGAIN QUASHED AT HARVARD  |  October 21, 2009
    It should come as no surprise to readers of “Freedom Watch” that yet another instance of political, intellectual, and academic censorship has sprung up at Harvard, the self-touted pinnacle of higher education.
  •   THE GATES CASE ISN'T ABOUT RACE  |  August 05, 2009
    The weeks-long hubbub over the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr. by the Cambridge Police Department has centered on race, understandably, for two reasons: 1) the African-American population has suffered inequitably in its relations with law enforcement across this country, and 2) a race story is easier for the media to tell — and to sell.
  •   MUZZLE AWARDS: COLLEGIATE DIVISION  |  July 10, 2009
    In a 1957 Supreme Court decision upholding the free-speech rights of university professors ( Sweezy v. New Hampshire ), Justice Felix Frankfurter quoted prominent South African scholars on the importance of academic freedom.
  •   GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY  |  June 24, 2009
    The US Supreme Court's June 18 decision denying prisoners access to DNA testing — a procedure that could reliably prove innocence — adds to the high court's decades-long shameful record on criminal-justice issues.
  •   ROBOJUDGE  |  June 11, 2009
    Judge Stephen Breyer, Bill Clinton's latest pick for the Supreme Court, has attracted support so broad that it spans ideological and political differences.  

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group