The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

On moving City Hall

Plus, Jimmy Carter chickens out after laying a rotten egg
By EDITORIAL  |  December 20, 2006

061222_edit-main2

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino may fancy himself an urban mechanic, but we’re beginning to suspect that he has an edifice complex.

Early in his administration, Menino staked much on the construction of the new waterfront convention center, which astounded skeptics with its distinctive yet practical design. Its lack of parking is a very real problem, but a solution is being planned.

Menino, who has a widely recognized capacity for obstruction, earned high marks for his role in helping to relocate and facilitate the construction of the Institute of Contemporary Art’s internationally acclaimed new home not far from the convention center.

And the mayor’s idea — more of a trial balloon, really — to get a good old-fashioned, for-profit developer to build an 80-story office tower in the Financial District is not only provocative, it’s, well, visionary: good for the economy (jobs), good for the tax base (new revenue), good for the skyline (needs drama). With the right market conditions and a proper review process, it could be a winner.

The jury is still out, however, on his idea to sell off the current city hall and build a new one on the waterfront. It is understandable that Menino has the waterfront on his brain. History will hold its transformation and development as being not only synonymous with his mayoralty, but probably his most enduring legacy.

Before the public sees fit to issue a giant check, it is important to keep this administration’s complete record on development in mind. It’s mixed.

The convention center, admirable though it may be, has yet to realize its promise. The rejuvenation of Fenway Park owes nothing to the mayor. Market forces, not municipal foresight, are what are transforming the larger Fenway-Kenmore neighborhood. (In retrospect, Menino and the legislature look either downright foolish or desperate in their one-time willingness to use a guarantee of taxpayers’ dollars to bail out the Red Sox’ previous dim-witted management.) And the city’s conceptualization of how to best use the downtown greenway made possible by the Big Dig has not been a profile in imagination. So let’s go slow with the idea of moving Boston City Hall.

Boston College professor emeritus Thomas O’Connor, the closest thing this city has to an official historian, noted in an essay published earlier this week how central City Hall’s historic location is to the life of the city. We would add to his thinking the idea that the open space of City Hall Plaza, as brutal and as under-utilized as it may be, nevertheless has calculable value as urban open space.

Open space is one of the things that make Boston so appealing, so livable, so humane. From Franklin Park to Frederick Law Olmsted’s Emerald Necklace of fens and marsh and parks that culminates in the drama of the Comm Ave Mall, the Public Garden, and Boston Common, Boston is — as cities go — an ecological delight.

Can City Hall Plaza ever be delightful? That is, admittedly, a tall order. But it is possible. Why not plant grass? Create a second Public Garden? Get funky: contemplate a downtown apple orchard. Follow the example of Paris: cultivate a world-famous flea market. With all the brainpower concentrated in Boston — and across the Charles River in Cambridge — it’s hard to believe that innovative and transformational ideas have been exhausted.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Boston music news: March 28, 2008, You could look it up, The Boston Red Sox, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Politics, Jimmy Carter, Baseball,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
On moving City Hall
City Hall fails not only because of the building design but because of the City Council Staff Director flouting Sunshine open public meetings principles, flouting FOI freedom of information public records principles, flouting open government principles. Existing Council communications are not disclosed in a user friendly manner. Council communications that should be developed are not available. The people are kept at too long an arms reach from getting involved with their Council. The general manner is one of being done a favor when enquiring for information from the City Council. People should not have to deal with any implication that learning about their municipal government is a favor that is being done to fulfill their enquiry for information. Council communications should be coordinated better in terms of using the best available technologies and software. Unedited City Council stenographic machine transcribed output of Councilors' debate should be readily available at <a href="http://cityofboston.gov/citycouncil">http://cityofboston.gov/citycouncil</a>
By dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu on 12/21/2006 at 11:52:28
On moving City Hall
Your columnist starts by characterizing Carter's book as "grossly ill-informed book, shamefully and misleadingly" without offering any proof or historical data for his analysis. Then he proceeded by further attacking the former President for avoiding to debate the ex-Brooklyn youth and now Harvard "scholar" Alan Dershowitz. Carter's book generates so much passion for a very simple reason which is cutting to the heart of the issue and acknowledging what so many scholars and commentators around the world (including many Israelis) have been exposing for so many years: the refusal of the Israeli state to comply with international law. In terms of Carter avoiding to debate Dershowitz there is not much to be said. Dershowitz style may be combatant but mostly void of truth and morals. After all a few of us still remember Dershowitz public and early arguments in support of torture, and we all now know the disastrous results of these policies. Carter had the courage to write a very important book knowing well what is going to follow. I hope your readers take the opportunity to read Carter’s book and I encourage your ignorant columnist to do the same thing.
By papas on 12/28/2006 at 11:03:57
On moving City Hall
Dershowitz had "the facts" on his side? Are memories that short? Anyone remember him getting his butt handed to him by Norman Finkelstein? http://tinyurl.com/y8ojpn I can't defend Carter's book, since I haven't read it. Of course, it is obvious from your editorial that you haven't either, and are just attacking for the sake of attacking, with no real basis for your argument. I swear, The Phoenix is the biggest knee-jerk Isreal defender I have since Howard Stern went off the (public) air. Why not try actually addressing his arguments? Oh, wait. That might be journalism.
By Nufta on 12/31/2006 at 10:59:24

ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WHALIN' ON PALIN  |  November 24, 2009
    Give Sarah Palin this: she isn’t driven by polls. If she wanted to improve her chances at political success, she would have used her book and promotional tour to convince America that she has substance and gravitas .
  •   TAXING CATHOLICS  |  November 18, 2009
    Should the Roman Catholic Church, and the various subsidiary groups and organizations that exist under its umbrella and operate at its direction, be entitled to state- and federal-tax exemptions?
  •   COAKLEY TAKES A STAND  |  November 18, 2009
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley this week separated herself from the gang of essentially like-minded candidates seeking to fill Senator Ted Kennedy's Washington seat by rejecting the US House of Representatives compromise that traded approval of a health-care-reform bill for greater restrictions to abortion access. Good for Coakley.
  •   MENINO, AGAIN  |  November 04, 2009
    At a time when Americans are racked by anxiety about the uncertain future of a weak economy, Boston voters handily returned Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to an unprecedented fifth term.
  •   FOR MAYOR: VOTE FLAHERTY + YOON  |  November 04, 2009
    Boston’s mayoral candidates are running campaigns that are variations on a theme.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group