The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

The artists are innocent

It's the media and politicians who blew this one
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  February 2, 2007

070202_bostonfire_main1
The Boston Fire Department removes a Mooninite

I have to disagree with almost everyone in the mainstream press -- and many bloggers too -- in assessing blame all around for the latest “terrorist hoax,” so-called.

It was an obvious joke, as anyone under 25 would have known in an instant.

The problem is that our entire “National Security/Anti-terrorist” establishment appears to be composed of older guys (no offense meant – I’m an older guy myself) who had no idea it was a piece of performance art touting a Cartoon Network show aimed at the young.

But by the time the anti-terrorist squad water-cannoned the first “exhibit” around 10:30 am and saw that it did not explode, why was the campaign continued until 5:30 pm?

By late morning, after all, the Blogosphere realized what it was. Why did it take the “experts” six or seven more hours, with closed subway lines and a blocked Charles River and all, to catch-on?  How safe does that make you feel?

I attach no blame (get that – NO blame at all) to the advertisers and performance artists.  After all, the same campaign in a number of other cities did not spark panic. (And, besides, the damned things were up two weeks before the first report spurred a panic. How safe does that make you feel?)

This could be seen as a serious threat only by the people to whom we have delegated the job of protecting us in the Age of Terror. From the CIA director right down to the local city or town anti-terror squad, we’re in sorry shape. Maybe watching Cartoon Network should be part of the training henceforth. Or maybe just hire a few younger folk.

When I was a young lawyer, I represented a couple of MIT students who were charged with making so-called “black boxes” which imitated the touch-tone sounds of a telephone (touch-tone was then fairly new); by using these tones, they were able to imitate the signals that allowed them to make long-distance calls without going through the phone company’s billing computer. Hence, they were able to call all over the country and the world for free. This technical achievement by smart MIT students threatened to cost the phone company a fortune. But the phone company (then AT&T, the monopoly), rather than push ahead on the prosecution, HIRED the MIT students to advise them how to counter this technical achievement. Naturally, the MIT students, having invented the problem, also invented the solution. It was one of those times that I thought that private industry was much smarter than the government. The prosecutors were urging the phone company to put the kids in jail. The phone company just wanted to protect itself – and, besides, the MIT students were not criminals, were not the enemy. They were us. The phone company hired the kids. Problem solved.

That’s my take on this whole sorry mess. I would give the perpetrator an award for performance art, and I’d send the anti-terror cops back to school. The Globe’s coverage is unreal today, right down to the breathless editorial. Emily Rooney (with whom I normally agree) last night was swooning and fainting with Tom Menino, each out-doing the other as to how awful this “hoax” was. Well, it was NOT a hoax. It was performance art.  A hoax is meant to panic people. This was meant to entertain and advertise. It worked only with the younger among us. We older folks should learn a lesson and make sure we hire some younger folks to help protect us. They at least can differentiate a real threat from art and advertising.

I’ve rarely seen such massive self-delusion and dis-placed anger. As Pogo used to say, “we have met the enemy and he is us.”

Related: Taking the B-boys to School, Punk 2 techno, Absence and presence, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Entertainment, Internet, Science and Technology,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
The artists are innocent
It's good to see some halfway reasonable response to this in the Boston press. Menino's been particularly embarrassing, but who could've expected otherwise? The Globe, on the other hand, should be ashamed once their collective breathing has slowed down. They read as though they're already a bit ashamed over there, actually, and are making up for it with bad reporting and a totally irresponsible use of the word "hoax." (It isn't a hoax, fellas, if it's not "intended to deceive or defraud.") By the way, the riff on Hazard Perry's "and the enemy is ours" isn't from Charlie Brown, but from Walt Kelly's classic comic Pogo.
By AL on 02/01/2007 at 5:09:19
The artists are innocent
I disagee. The perps should be fined maybe 50 dollars for illegal placement of signs on public property. On the other hand there is no law against paranoia and foolishness so Menino et. al. unfortunately cannot be held accountable.
By Bob in Cambridge on 02/01/2007 at 5:23:28
The artists are innocent
Protecting the populace from every seemingly unclaimed bit of property is an exercise in futility and only serves to keep society in a heightened state of paranoia. Calling the bomb squad for every forgotten college bookbag left behind at a T station or throwie put up on a bridge seems like a bad 80's sit-com gag that won't die. Sure there might be a bomb in that bookbag, but there may just as easily be an AK-47 tucked into baby's carriage, or a waistband of dynamite under that guy's Red Sox jacket. The entire country has PTSD from 911, and it's about as productive for the country as it is for any individual. The entire country needs therapy, and we're not exactly getting fireside chats from the therapist-in-chief.
By newsletter_haffathot@gmail.com on 02/01/2007 at 7:10:33
The artists are innocent
No, no, no. Not performance art. They were paid by an advertising firm to put up the signs. Marketing. "Guerrilla" marketing by corporate America attempting to co-opt subversive graffiti culture for its own gain. And, not surprisingly, getting it wrong. Please see this excellent piece from the Anti-Advertising Agency. http://antiadvertisingagency.com/ If the Phoenix is going to shit all over the official response being out of touch with pop culture at least understand the other references at work here. While the subject matter was ATHF, the method was all Graffiti Research Lab. Which y'all have probably never even heard of.
By kay on 02/01/2007 at 11:18:58
The artists are innocent
Menino, meet Moonintes. http://s170.photobucket.com/albums/u241/xombievox/?action=view&current=boston.jpg
By xombievox on 02/02/2007 at 1:38:51

ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FREE SPEECH AGAIN QUASHED AT HARVARD  |  October 21, 2009
    It should come as no surprise to readers of “Freedom Watch” that yet another instance of political, intellectual, and academic censorship has sprung up at Harvard, the self-touted pinnacle of higher education.
  •   THE GATES CASE ISN'T ABOUT RACE  |  August 05, 2009
    The weeks-long hubbub over the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr. by the Cambridge Police Department has centered on race, understandably, for two reasons: 1) the African-American population has suffered inequitably in its relations with law enforcement across this country, and 2) a race story is easier for the media to tell — and to sell.
  •   MUZZLE AWARDS: COLLEGIATE DIVISION  |  July 10, 2009
    In a 1957 Supreme Court decision upholding the free-speech rights of university professors ( Sweezy v. New Hampshire ), Justice Felix Frankfurter quoted prominent South African scholars on the importance of academic freedom.
  •   GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY  |  June 24, 2009
    The US Supreme Court's June 18 decision denying prisoners access to DNA testing — a procedure that could reliably prove innocence — adds to the high court's decades-long shameful record on criminal-justice issues.
  •   ROBOJUDGE  |  June 11, 2009
    Judge Stephen Breyer, Bill Clinton's latest pick for the Supreme Court, has attracted support so broad that it spans ideological and political differences.  

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group