The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

If terrorists hit Boston

By STEPHEN FLYNN  |  March 8, 2007

A bit more research revealed that when the 629-foot freight ship New Carissa, of Panamanian registry and carrying 400,000 gallons of fuel, ran ground of Coos Bay, Oregon, it took more than three months and the involvement of 58 federal agencies and more than 700 people to deal with the resulting wreck and oil spill. Marine accidents on the West Coast have become increasingly rare, which has translated into there not being enough demand to support a commercial salvage industry there. This means that it would likely take weeks to clear a major wreck sunk in Long Beach Harbor. In the interim, the region’s refineries would be idled within a week and the nation’s most populous region would literally run out of gas.

070309_terror_main2
All but the last two paragraphs excerpted from The Edge of Disaster by Stephen Flynn. Copyright © 2007 by Stephen Flynn. Reprinted by arrangement with The Random House Publishing Group.
Nabih also learned that while Americans seemed to be talking a great deal about port security, they had really not done much about it. The Port of Los Angeles has 7500 acres of waterways and facilities, and 43 miles of waterfront. This infrastructure is being protected by a port police force of just over 100 officers, and a diverse collection of private security services hired by the marine terminal. Long Beach’s equivalent area of waterways and facilities is even more exposed: just a dozen Long Beach police officers and a small cadre of port security personnel patrol a waterfront protected primarily by private security guards hired by terminal operators. There are other federal, state, county, and city agencies that have some level of jurisdiction in this massive port complex, but all maintain only a tiny presence. Too often, confusion over who should be in charge leaves many security gaps unattended. In the five years since 9/11, Los Angeles had received just $25 million dollars in federal grants to improve its port security, less than what Washington spends on airport security every two days.

By surfing the Web, the terrorist planner was able to find a July 2006 Seattle Times article describing the experiences of a reporter who easily penetrated the security of ports in Los Angeles-Long Beach and Seattle. All he had to do was hitch a ride from a few immigrant truck drivers coming to drop off and pick up cargo. The one time when the reporter was asked for identification, he flashed an expired driver’s license to a uniformed guard standing 15 feet away, who then waved him through the gate.

Regarding the Americans’ ability to deal with the risk of a small-boat attack, beginning in 2002, the Coast Guard had deployed armed maritime safety and security teams to operate out of 13 US ports, including Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Boston. However, even the commandant of the US Coast Guard seemed apprehensive that the service was not ready to deal with the threat. Admiral Thad Allen had publicly declared that while its own threat and vulnerability analysis had confirmed that there was a real risk, “We haven’t put nearly as much thinking in science and technology and (general) thought into the small-vessel threat as we need to.”

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |   next >
Related: Gubernatorial agonistes, Crossword: ''I'm surrounded by idiots'', 20 reasons the Earth will be glad to see Bush go, More more >
  Topics: News Features , U.S. Coast Guard, Tom Menino, Transportation,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
If terrorists hit Boston
What about submarine type vessels? What kind of detection is set up to monitior these
By M. Dan Jones on 03/16/2007 at 1:45:43
If terrorists hit Boston
The LNG terminal at Everett is just the tip of the iceberg of toxic chemicals and dangerous substances that transit the harbor and the roadways of metro Boston. The thought of an LNG tanker fire is certainly sensational, but let's not use it as an excuse to defile the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area. The concluding paragraph of this article points directly to Outer Brewster Island, where one company, AES, has already tried (unsucessfully) to hoodwink the Legislature into divesting itself of an important asset for recreation and natural resource diversity. If you think we need to increase our dependency on foreign-sourced fossil fuel, then LNG is for you. But don't let this or any other industry turn the Harbor Islands into an industrial site.
By workingforchange on 03/23/2007 at 10:40:26
If terrorists hit Boston
And to learn more about the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area and the downside of locating an LNG terminal in your national park, check out www.savethebrewsters.org
By workingforchange on 03/24/2007 at 3:57:41

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group