The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

If terrorists hit Boston

By STEPHEN FLYNN  |  March 8, 2007

The expense involved in making our catastrophic terrorism targets less attractive is far from overwhelming, especially when measured against the $250 million the US has been spending every day since the spring of 2003 on the war in Iraq. The LNG facility outside Boston would be considerably safer in a remote location near the harbor’s entrance or farther offshore, which would mean tankers wouldn’t need to transit so close to a densely populated area. If attacked, the fire would be spectacular, but the consequences would not. The Coast Guard should also do more to reach out to the people who live, work, and play on Boston’s waterfront to educate the very people who might witness a dry run or actual event. Our most important and largely untapped national assets are everyday citizens, who too often are kept in the dark about the details of potential terrorist attacks. We would do well to heed Thomas Jefferson’s famous admonition, “A nation’s best defense is an educated citizenry.”

Stephen Flynn, a former US Coast Guard commander, is the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick senior fellow for national-security studies at the Council of Foreign Relations.

To buy a copy of The Edge of Disaster, click here.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  | 
Related: Gubernatorial agonistes, Crossword: ''I'm surrounded by idiots'', 20 reasons the Earth will be glad to see Bush go, More more >
  Topics: News Features , U.S. Coast Guard, Tom Menino, Transportation,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
If terrorists hit Boston
What about submarine type vessels? What kind of detection is set up to monitior these
By M. Dan Jones on 03/16/2007 at 1:45:43
If terrorists hit Boston
The LNG terminal at Everett is just the tip of the iceberg of toxic chemicals and dangerous substances that transit the harbor and the roadways of metro Boston. The thought of an LNG tanker fire is certainly sensational, but let's not use it as an excuse to defile the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area. The concluding paragraph of this article points directly to Outer Brewster Island, where one company, AES, has already tried (unsucessfully) to hoodwink the Legislature into divesting itself of an important asset for recreation and natural resource diversity. If you think we need to increase our dependency on foreign-sourced fossil fuel, then LNG is for you. But don't let this or any other industry turn the Harbor Islands into an industrial site.
By workingforchange on 03/23/2007 at 10:40:26
If terrorists hit Boston
And to learn more about the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area and the downside of locating an LNG terminal in your national park, check out www.savethebrewsters.org
By workingforchange on 03/24/2007 at 3:57:41

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group