The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Diagnostic politics

Will Elizabeth Edwards’s cancer give her husband special grace?
By STEVEN STARK  |  March 28, 2007

070330_edwrads_main
IF YOU CAN’T BEAT IT . . .  John and Elizabeth Edwards met with sympathy and cynicism after announcing they would continue his campaign.

It’s an unfortunate fact of American political life that one’s entire personal life becomes public the minute one runs for office. So it went for John Edwards last week, with the disclosure that his wife Elizabeth’s cancer had returned. That fired up the pundits, who, after a few sympathetic nods, went straight into election-analysis mode.

With situations like this, it helps to wait before taking stock; even a week later, though, no one really knows how this will affect Edwards’s campaign. It’s true that as the life expectancy of Americans increases, political stories about illness become the rule, not the exception. Rudy Giuliani and John McCain are both cancer survivors, as is John Kerry. Ann Romney has MS. Paul Tsongas waged an active campaign with his cancer in remission; and Ronald Reagan had major cancer surgery while president.

No one knew these stories in the past because the press didn’t report them. History might have taken some very different turns had Americans been informed about JFK’s Addison’s disease and colitis, the extent of Woodrow Wilson’s stroke or FDR’s polio, or Grover Cleveland’s jaw operation.

In this case, though it was obviously not one of the Edwardses’ considerations, the nation seemed impressed by the way the couple handled the situation. More than any other event in the campaign so far, it captured public attention and became “water cooler” talk. While some undoubtedly found fault with the Edwardses’ decision to let the campaign go forward, far more were struck by their grace and determination not to let this development stand in their way. They also saw the couple as a genuine team, in contrast with some notable others in the race. When John Edwards now talks on the stump, his promise to fight for the little guys who’ve taken their knocks will have new meaning.

Republicans

Rudy Giuliani.
Odds for nomination: even.

The negative stories have begun to flow (last week it was that his current wife had a secret first marriage), but his numbers stay high. Either the public doesn’t care because they regard Giuliani much the way they did Eisenhower — as a national hero — or they’re not yet paying sufficient attention. Every week that Giuliani maintains his double-digit lead over McCain is another week he appears to be the inevitable choice, making it harder for his opponents to raise money against him. He’s still not really campaigning in Iowa, though, which leaves him vulnerable to the rise of a formidable opponent who could come out of nowhere in the initial caucus state.

John McCain.
Odds: 5-3.

McCain still has a long way to go. There appears to be something static about his efforts so far, including in the arena of fundraising; a good first debate outing would help a lot.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: The shape of things to come, The X factors, Suffrage net city, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Elections and Voting,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group