The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
50_bands_50_States_2009_banner

Punish the mentally ill!

In the lobby
By LANCE TAPLEY  |  April 11, 2007
070413_INSIDE_PRISON
PUNISHED, NOT TREATED: Michael James

Officials in Maine attorney general Steven Rowe’s office recently tried to get a law passed that would have blessed the department’s position that severely mentally ill prisoners should be punished before being treated. And they made the legislative effort in a controversial way.

The measure required prisoners committed to Riverview Psychiatric Center because they were found “not criminally responsible” for assaults on guards due to insanity to first finish their prison sentences before receiving treatment in the Augusta state mental hospital.

An assistant attorney general had gotten the Criminal Justice Advisory Commission (CLAC), a committee of judges and lawyers, to sponsor it, but CLAC quickly withdrew it from legislative consideration when the group discovered it might affect a lawsuit the AG is involved in.

The AG’s office had not told CLAC of the suit, which seeks to force the Department of Corrections to hospitalize Michael James, a state prison inmate with severe mental illness. The department has defied a judge’s commitment order by keeping him in prison, and the AG is defending Corrections (see “Arbitrary Imprisonment,” by Lance Tapley, July 21, 2006.)

In fact, one of the two assistants attorney general who developed the proposal to change the law, Diane Sleek, represents Corrections. The other, special assistant AG Charles Leadbetter, a CLAC member, had convinced the group to sponsor the change.

In an e-mail, Sleek says: “There was no attempt by this office to pre-empt by legislation the court case. Indeed, I do not believe that any legislation would have applied retroactively and, thus, would not have applied to the case being litigated now. The inclusion of this provision in the CLAC bill was due to a misunderstanding.”

But other lawyers, including Michael James’s attorney Helen Bailey, said the law could have affected appeals. John Pelletier, chairman of the AG-appointed but theoretically independent CLAC, said he pulled the provision from consideration by the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee at an April 6 work session because “our practice is not to put forth changes that affect pending litigation.” It had been in CLAC’s annual omnibus bill revising criminal statutes, LD 1240.

Linda Pistner, chief deputy attorney AG, while admitting Sleek “reviewed” the bill, said it was “not an AG bill.”

Leadbetter took responsibility for carrying the proposal to CLAC — “Nobody was to blame except myself” — although he conceded Sleek made suggestions and there “may have been others” in the AG’s office who reviewed it. He said he was aware the lawsuit existed but had not kept up on its details.

Michael James, 24, one of the sickest men in the Warren prison, has spent years in the harsh solitary-confinement Supermax. If his assault record is testimony, he has gotten sicker by the year.

Last summer, a Knox County jury found him not guilty by reason of insanity for 10 assaults on guards. After Superior Court judge Donald Marden committed him to Riverview, Corrections officials said the AG’s office told them not to send him there. The AG’s office would not explain the refusal.

James’s trial lawyer, Joseph Steinberger, of Rockland, and the Disability Rights Center, of Augusta, represented by Bailey, sued to compel the state to obey the judge.

LD 1240’s withdrawn provision stated that in instances like James’s “the person must first serve the undischarged term of imprisonment” before going to the hospital. James has nearly 10 years left on a previous guard-assault and several theft sentences. Steinberger has said that such a mentally ill inmate threatens himself through suicide and further assault convictions, which could add years to his time.

At a March 26 hearing, the provision was opposed by the Maine Civil Liberties Union (MCLU), the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Maine (NAMI Maine), and Bailey.
She told the committee that leaving a mentally ill person in prison for years without proper treatment would probably result in him becoming more dangerous to guards.

Richard Thompson, speaking for MCLU and NAMI Maine, said, “If this committee is truly committed to keeping these individuals in prison, it must guarantee that there will be adequate funding, training, and staff resources to care for them in a manner that does not threaten their Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.”

Both organizations Thompson represents have criticized the state’s prisons for inadequate treatment of mentally ill inmates.

Leadbetter appeared unmoved by appeals to humane treatment.

“Execution of punishment” should come first, he said in an interview. He went so far as to assert: “I don’t care whether it works or not” — about the prison’s treatment of mentally ill inmates.

He maintained that the law forbids a prisoner to be in the custody of two departments — Corrections and Health and Human Services, which operates Riverview — at the same time.

Bailey scoffed: “They do it now,” saying she has as clients prisoners who serve sentences while committed to Riverview.

Bailey and Leadbetter agreed, however, that issues in the Michael James case are potentially far-reaching. Leadbetter said there are “constitutional implications.”

  Topics: This Just In , Health and Fitness, Criminal Sentencing and Punishment, Mental Health,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Punish the mentally ill!
I recently came across this series of articles on the internet. Speaking of insane, perhaps Maine's attorney general and his cohorts should be committed to a mental institution before they do any more harm. I was under the impression that the task of attorneys general had something to do with public safety. Making sure people with documented severe mental problems are thoroughly punished (for crimes they were adjudged too ill to be responsible for) before you try to treat their illnesses can only make the rest of us less safe, since most of these people will eventually be released. Would anyone argue that a child who exhibited violence should first be locked in her room for 10 years before being taken to a psychiatrist? Our society (which many people characterize as Christian!!!) has become so vindictive in recent years that I hardly recognize my country any more. We babble incessantly about the need to make us safer by getting "tough on crime" and then, in fits of irrational emotion, pass laws that make us all vastly less safe. We need to get past this self-destruc tive quest for vengenace and base our criminal justice sanctions on one simple question: What can be done so that when Joe Smith gets out of prison and moves next door to us, we aren't afraid to have him there? For all our sakes, we had BETTER care whether these people's treatment works or not!
By Claudia Hutchinson on 05/21/2007 at 9:46:40
Punish the mentally ill!
What exactly is the nature of Mr. James "mental illness"? All I see in this article is that he is extremely assaultive. Assault is against the law and assaultiveness is not a symptom of mental illness. What have I missed? Recently, I saw in the Kennebec Journal that Mr. James is accused of this same behavior at Riverview where is getting "treatment"? Hmmmmm.......
By psyrnls on 01/17/2008 at 11:12:54

ARTICLES BY LANCE TAPLEY
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: LANCE TAPLEY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group