The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Casino gambling: Yes

By EDITORIAL  |  May 30, 2007

The reasonable fear is that even without state-approved expansion of permissible games, Wampanoag gambling will drain life from the state lottery without any of the compensatory tourism advantages that high-class casinos bring. The tribe, of course, recognizes its leverage and hopes to strike a deal similar to that in Connecticut, where the state receives 25 percent of all slot-machine revenue. Last year, it received $427 million from the two casinos. A sizable chunk of that money came from Massachusetts residents who spent an estimated $1.1 billion gambling in our neighboring state.

Cahill has suggested that if luxury casino gambling were legalized in Massachusetts, the state could collect as much as a billion dollars annually in taxes and gaming fees. Is that reasonable? We do not know. But 11 other states, including Nevada, New Jersey, Illinois, and Indiana, all have non-tribal gambling. Making a comparison should not be difficult.

When all is said and done, the equation is not complicated: how much money would Massachusetts gain if a private developer went into the casino business with all the fees and sales, meals, lodging, and gambling taxes collected? And how much money would we collect if we were to negotiate with the Wampanoags for an expanded form of gaming in exchange for a cut of tribal action? The federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, which regulates tribal matters, has capped Connecticut’s take at 25 percent. Some private casinos pay their state governments almost 50 percent.

It is clear that Massachusetts is going to have an expanded gambling sector in the future, whether it likes it or not. The question is what’s better for the state: gaming by the Wampanoags alone or gaming by the tribe as well as by a private corporation? The answer will lie in the numbers. We trust that Cahill — and Patrick — recognize that.

Build cape wind now
As Adam Reilly’s story demonstrates, a powerful collection of privileged private interests — inexplicably spearheaded by Senator Ted Kennedy — is trying to scuttle plans to build a farm of windmills in Nantucket Sound, offshore from the Kennedy-family compound. Kennedy and his wealthy neighbors’ interests are clearly blinding them to the need to build this facility as part of a larger national and international effort to reduce our dependency on fossil fuel. The need is now. The cause is great. It is time for Massachusetts to embrace the importance of going green and build Cape Wind.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Four-star rebuttal, Cash carousel, Who’s with whom, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Deval Patrick, U.S. Government, U.S. State Government,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WHALIN' ON PALIN  |  November 24, 2009
    Give Sarah Palin this: she isn’t driven by polls. If she wanted to improve her chances at political success, she would have used her book and promotional tour to convince America that she has substance and gravitas .
  •   TAXING CATHOLICS  |  November 18, 2009
    Should the Roman Catholic Church, and the various subsidiary groups and organizations that exist under its umbrella and operate at its direction, be entitled to state- and federal-tax exemptions?
  •   COAKLEY TAKES A STAND  |  November 18, 2009
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley this week separated herself from the gang of essentially like-minded candidates seeking to fill Senator Ted Kennedy's Washington seat by rejecting the US House of Representatives compromise that traded approval of a health-care-reform bill for greater restrictions to abortion access. Good for Coakley.
  •   MENINO, AGAIN  |  November 04, 2009
    At a time when Americans are racked by anxiety about the uncertain future of a weak economy, Boston voters handily returned Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to an unprecedented fifth term.
  •   FOR MAYOR: VOTE FLAHERTY + YOON  |  November 04, 2009
    Boston’s mayoral candidates are running campaigns that are variations on a theme.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group