The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

O Positive

By STEVEN STARK  |  July 25, 2007

It was the Clintons, way back in 1992, who promised voters a two-for-one couple. But this is the first campaign where the idea has really taken off. It would be impossible, for instance, to imagine Hillary’s candidacy going very far without the considerable backing of her husband, in everything from fundraising to the reassurance he provides (to some) as a reliable figure in a Clinton White House redux. And it may actually be an understatement to say that Elizabeth Edwards has co-billing with her husband, given the considerable publicity she has generated this past month through campaign commercials, confrontations with Ann Coulter, attacks on Hillary, and a wonderful and well-deserved profile on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. Which makes it all the more obvious that Obama, surrounded by political power couples, is essentially standing on his own. (His wife, Michelle, though an accomplished lawyer, isn’t a celebrity — nor should she be.)

But if Oprah stays in the fray, she could help even things out on that front. No, she isn’t related to Obama, but that may give her endorsement more credibility, in the eyes of some. And she may be so large a cultural force that her occasional presence on the campaign scene could outweigh that of Bill or Elizabeth.

The FCC “equal time” rule prevents Oprah from doing much for Obama on her television program. (In a related development, fans of Law and Order should be prepared to say goodbye to many of that show’s re-runs when Fred Thompson, a/k/a Arthur Branch, announces his candidacy, since that same ruling prevents re-airing shows that feature the soon-to-be candidate.) But that’s of little importance. Oprah is news whatever she says, wherever she says it. And if she keeps beating the drum for Obama, it could well spell trouble for the other Democrats.

THE FIELD
REPUBLICANS
RUDY GIULIANI Odds: 5-3 | past week: 2-1
MITT ROMNEY Odds: 7-2 | same
NEWT GINGRICH Odds: 5-1 | 4-1
FRED THOMPSON Odds: 6-1 | same
JOHN McCAIN Odds: 9-1 | same
MIKE HUCKABEE Odds: 100-1 | 300-1
SAM BROWNBACK Odds: 1000-1 | same
TOMMY THOMPSON Odds: 20,000-1 | same
DUNCAN HUNTER Odds: 50,000-1 | same
RON PAUL Odds: 100,000-1 | 250,000-1
TOM TANCREDO Odds: 150,000-1 | 75,000-1

DEMOCRATS
BARACK OBAMA
Odds: 4-3 | past week: same
HILLARY CLINTON Odds: 3-2 | same
JOHN EDWARDS Odds: 6-1 | 7-1
BILL RICHARDSON Odds: 60-1 | 40-1
JOE BIDEN Odds: 85-1 | 65-1
CHRIS DODD Odds: 150-1 | same
DENNIS KUCINICH Odds: 50,000-1 | 25,000-1
MIKE GRAVEL Odds: 1 million to 1 | same

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Leggo my ego!, Propping up a puppet, Letters to the Portland Editor: March 13, 2009, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Rosa Parks,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
O Positive
A great development in the eyes of this Obama supporter. I honestly never had much respect for Oprah. However, I recently learned that she was the only member of the mainstream media that questioned our need to go to war with Iraq. Check this out: http://agonist.org/checkervest/20070721/oprah_was_only_major_media_to_question_going_to_war All I have to say is now, I've got a lot more respect. Good thing to hear she endorses my candidate
By J-Ro on 07/27/2007 at 1:59:43
O Positive
oprah winfrey's effort will put some money in mr. obama's campaign chest. that's all. just reflect on michael jordan's endorsement of bill bradley in 2000. the democrat electorate is far too creatively self-destructive than to run off a cliff behind some television personality. i'm waiting for congressman kucinich to channel timothy leary. now that's the politics of hope.
By jeffery mcnary on 07/29/2007 at 8:57:04

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group