The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

When Rupert came to Boston

By ADAM REILLY  |  August 8, 2007

Still, the Herald — like the Post— took great relish in tormenting Massachusetts senator Ted Kennedy, Murdoch’s liberal nemesis. (In 1987, Kennedy exacted revenge by crafting legislation that forced Murdoch to sell the Post; Murdoch repurchased the paper in 1993.) And the paper’s editorial page was famously harsh on then–Massachusetts congressman John Kerry in his 1984 Senate race against Republican Ray Shamie. “That was a critical race, and the Herald hounded Kerry,” says one Herald veteran who asked not to be identified. “One of the questions that was always there was who was calling the shots on that. Was it Joe Robinowitz? Les Hinton? I’m not privy to whether Robinowitz picked up the phone and talked to Murdoch four times a day. But I know [Murdoch’s] influence was pretty clear.”

Dow groans?
As different as the Herald and the Journal are in terms of editorial content, the biggest discrepancy between Murdoch’s purchases of the two papers is probably financial. Murdoch spent $5 billion to buy Dow Jones; he ponied up just $1 million to pry the HeraldAmerican from Hearst. (The Herald deal also included future financial considerations, reportedly up to $7 million; the cumulative purchase price remains unclear.)

The implications of these vastly different price tags are uncertain, however. A case could be made that, since Murdoch bought the Herald on the cheap, he had no reason to invest a great deal of time or energy in the paper. But the opposite argument could also be made: since the Herald cost Murdoch a pittance, he could have run roughshod over the paper without giving it a second thought.

As for the Journal, it’s true that Murdoch probably didn’t spend $5 billion in order to leave the paper untouched. Then again, this same $5 billion payment is a serious acknowledgment of just how much the Journal does right. In a best-case scenario, Murdoch gives the Journal added financial security and a major jolt of adrenaline. Worst case? Political pressure. Managers who know News Corp. but don’t know the Journal. And — worst of all — a steady diet of Wingo!

On the Web
Adam Reilly's Media Log: http://www.thephoenix.com/medialog

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
Related: Liberty or Death, High noon at the Herald, Leftward ho!, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Frank Phillips, Frank Phillips, Ivy League,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
When Rupert came to Boston
Not to make a big deal about COPYING A LEDE, which wasn't a piece of genius anyway, but have a look: STRAIGHT UP Over the Cliff With Rupe http://www.artsjournal.com/herman/archives/2007/08/over_the_cliff.html August 1, 2007 Lede: Is Rupert Murdoch good or bad for The Wall Street Journal? That's the burning question. (PS: The story focused on Murdoch in Chicago and was referred on Romensko's widely read site. Also crossposted on The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jan-herman/over-the-cliff-with-rupe_b_58751.html) THE PHOENIX When Rupert came to Boston http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid45226.aspx August 8, 2007 Lede: Just how badly will Rupert Murdoch screw up the Wall Street Journal? Ever since Murdoch's just-accepted $5 billion offer for Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company, became public this past May, this has been journalism's great burning question.
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 10:13:05
When Rupert came to Boston
JanH, two things. 1) Thanks for linking to your story, which I'd missed until now. 2) Since Murdoch's impact on the Journal is, in fact, journalism's hot topic du jour, is it really surprising that we both called it a "burning question"?
By Adam on 08/09/2007 at 10:50:44
When Rupert came to Boston
No surprise. What I am surprised by, however, is that you say you missed my story. i'll take your word for it, but i don't think one of my correspondents would. he messaged me: "Seems like he ripped off the entire premise -- what did Rupert do at the Bos Herald, just like you did Rupert at the S-T."
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 2:23:07
When Rupert came to Boston
PS: Don't get me wrong. Yours story is excellent -- exhaustive and well reported. Gracias for that.
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 2:46:35
When Rupert came to Boston
That Mr. Rosenbaum no longer works for a newspaper is not a surprise. A bit awkward to write the obit for something that didn't actually die, huh? Back when Globe was less agenda-driven, institutional memory could be found at Morrissey Blvd.; now, not so much. I have yet to hear anyone postulate about what the WSJ would have been like if the absurd dividends paid to the sainted Bancrofts had instead been plowed back into the company. CEO Peter Kann hires his wife at >$1mil/yr, not a peep. In the same way that politicians say that their good intentions are moot if they don't get elected, journalists are academic if their journal can't stay in business. I have yet to hear of a viable option to Murdoch, just "Conservatives- Threat or Menace?"
By rickinduxbury on 08/09/2007 at 11:55:15

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GOAL RUSH!  |  December 02, 2009
    Get two journalists in a room these days, and before the conversation is five minutes old they'll probably be kvetching about the grim state of the news business. Unless, that is, they happen to be sports journalists, in which case the conversation will likely focus on how absurdly bright the future looks. Especially here in Boston.
  •   GREG EPSTEIN, ATHEIST SUPERSTAR  |  November 24, 2009
    Once an intellectual taboo, atheism has become one of the great growth industries of the third millennium.
  •   UNMAKING A BAD FEDERAL LAW  |  November 24, 2009
    It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group