The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Wagering, or wavering?

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  August 15, 2007

The Mashpee can only conduct gambling that is legal elsewhere in the state, or that the state agrees to through a compact with the tribe. At the moment, there is no legal “Level III” gaming (where the bettor wages against the house, as opposed to against another bettor) in Massachusetts, including slot machines and table games.

Typically, what happens now, after a tribe receives recognition, is that the state sits down with the tribal leaders and works out a list (of types of gaming) and a number (of dollars to be paid to the state). Opponents say the state should refuse to make such a deal.

Will that stop the Mashpee? Ask the Seminole tribe in Florida.

Longtime Florida governor Jeb Bush and the Florida legislature refused to work out a deal to allow the Seminole to conduct Level III gaming. The Seminole opened casinos on its reservation land anyway. They installed “video bingo” — which technically counts as Level II gaming, because, even though it plays like a slot machine, it pits linked machines against each other, with the house taking just a percentage, as it would in a church bingo game. The casino was a wild success, so much so that the tribe bought the Hard Rock Cafe chain. (Video bingo survived a Jeb Bush challenge in Florida courts, although the issue has not been settled nationally.)

And the state of Florida, having no compact with the tribe, has been getting bupkes from the $1.6 billion the casino takes in every year.

Ferson says the Mashpee will take the same route, if necessary. Some in the Patrick administration and the legislature say that’s a bluff to force the state to negotiate a Level III gaming agreement. The state’s other recognized tribe, the Aquinna Wampanoag on Martha’s Vineyard, chose not to go that route when the state declined to legalize regular slots a few years ago. If the Mashpee try, federal courts could still define video bingo as Level III gaming.

But does Patrick really want to be the one fighting against the Native Americans — not to mention the labor unions (who badly want those construction, casino, and related hospitality jobs) — over this picayune distinction? And on what moral ground would he stand, when Bay Staters currently gather in dreary barrooms and betting parlors to toss their money away on the state’s own Keno game?

More importantly, what happens if the state goes that route, loses, and is left out as people leave those Keno parlors and dump their money into the Mashpee’s video bingo machines? (That always stands as a last option for the Mashpee, though they would, of course, prefer the trappings of a full-scale gambling operation.) As it stands, only the town of Middleborough, which has negotiated an $11 million annual payment, will reap any piece of the action.

It comes down to money
Certainly, if Patrick comes out against Level III gaming, he can stop the Mashpee from getting it, at least for now. While the legislature could try to approve it over his veto, leaders of both houses have said they will not.

But if Patrick wants to approve gaming in order to better control it, DiMasi could find himself in a politically tough spot, if he chooses to be the lone leadership voice of opposition.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Cheap jokes R us, No side bets, Ménage-à-trashed?, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Doug Rubin, Deval Patrick, Dan O'Connell,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Wagering, or wavering?
Good R-tickle on the inevitability of casino gambling. We can NOT continue to see thousands of our neighbors head for weekend "action" at Foxwoods or Mohegan in Connecticut. As for the morality of it all, bat crap! I see hard-working people buy "an arm" of scratch tickets every day. And ditto for all the lottery games. I can only hope that casino magnate Sheldon G. Adelson will be able to put up with typical MA folderol long enough to complete his dream of a major "resort destination" in MetroWest, MA, somewhere near the intersections of 495 and the Pike.
By Midfielder on 08/17/2007 at 6:57:31

ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   COAKLEY CASHES IN AT THE BAR  |  December 04, 2009
    It's no surprise that Martha Coakley has raised much of her money for her US Senate campaign from lawyers — that has been her professional and social circle for pretty much her entire adult life.
  •   THE X FACTOR  |  November 24, 2009
    Martha Coakley should be plenty thankful for the holiday weekend. The polls suggest that, if nothing significant changes between now and the December 8 primary, she should handily claim the Democratic nomination for US Senate.
  •   LADIES' MAN  |  November 18, 2009
    Early last week, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government announced suddenly that Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, would speak at a forum that Friday afternoon.
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? NO, HE HASN'T  |  November 12, 2009
    Barack Obama's popularity should not be judged by the day-to-day, media-driven vagaries of politics — nor by the wishful thinking of his opponents.
  •   THE QUIET STORM  |  November 04, 2009
    In recent weeks, Governor Deval Patrick has been receiving some of his best press in a long time — which is to say, he’s gotten very little coverage at all.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group