The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

I stand by what I said

By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  February 23, 2006

I understand that many of these initiatives will appear controversial. This is more a reflection of the sorry state of our campuses today than it is of the radical nature of my proposals. If the faculty wants to fight me, they will have to do so openly and on the merits. Since I’ve been given the awesome responsibility of leading one of the nation’s premier educational institutions, I plan to do so with a transparent agenda where I will either be supported or defeated on the merits. This is a national, not a local, battle. My tenure and success as this university’s president should not turn on whether my expressing a challenging point of view causes a tenured scientist to call for her smelling salts — which went out of fashion with the arrival of Darwin.

Harvey Silverglate, a frequent contributor to "Freedom Watch", is co-author of The Shadow University: The Betrayal of Liberty on America’s Campuses and co-founder of The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

___

On the Web:

Harvard University: http://www.harvard.edu/
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE): http://www.thefire.org/

E-mail the author:

Harvey Silverglate: has@harveysilverglate.com

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  | 
Related: Why the Imus cave-in is bad for free speech, radio, and the whole society, Free speech again quashed at Harvard, Parody flunks out, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Education, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
I stand by what I said
Bravo, Mr. Silverglate! It's about time someone said something about the utter hyprocrisy that permeates so many of our colleges and universities. It is unfortunate that Mr. Summers didn't have the cajones to stand up to the PC nazis in the faculty of arts & science.
By sisyphus00 on 02/23/2006 at 2:41:01
I stand by what I said
It is interesting that Summers could be the coarchitect -- along with Rubin -- of the 8 years of Clintonian prosperity and, along the way, help steer the world through two major financial crises and he can't govern Harvard. Is the problem with Summers, or with Harvard?
By frank on 02/23/2006 at 5:43:25
I stand by what I said
Through board elections, Harvard alumni have a substantial voice, whether the faculty putschists at Harvard get away with it. Will a cipher like Derek Bok continue to punch their meal-tickets? Or will the broader Harvard community demand a president who can stand up to them? Only partially in jest, I offer the following campaign poster: RUDI GIULIANI for President of Harvard University WILLIAM BRATTON for Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) Turf the squeegie-persons out of the FAS Faculty Lounge!
By Hugo S. Cunningham on 02/23/2006 at 11:18:30
I stand by what I said
Seems to reveal a man who was not very politically astute and who perhaps might take a few chances to stand up suddenly while in a duck blind with Dick Cheney. While the above point is valid -- for surely being politic is at least part of the job of anyone who is the president of Harvard -- I like the bigger question better. Was he right? Partially I think Summers was right to go after Cornel West & perhaps say the things that he might have said about women in Science etc ... It does seem to me like he got his ass kicked a little too hard and unfairly for some of this stuff. What is left off the page tho is how The University institution as a whole is becoming more and more corporate and that at least some of these actions -- i.e. trying to allow the military on campus, critiquing a stand against Israel & even the critique of Cornel West can be seen as a move to edge the power of the institution away from faculty and their concerns and more towards the administration and their concerns. Not enough has been written about how academia is moving more towards the top down corporate, professional school money-making consumer model and further away from a more idealistic model of creating educated, informed, critically minded citizens. (One book though that does outline the issue very clearly is Steal This University.) So while I don't disagree that Summers is something of a victim to over-zealous political-correctness, on the other hand, I applaud the faculty (and more surprisingly the board of directors) at Harvard for the small victory of not allowing themselves to get bowled over by an over-zealous, nation-wide campaign to suck the power away from the people who are most engaged and most powerfully motivated by the desire to understand the world better -- the faculty.
By joxygen on 02/23/2006 at 11:21:37

ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FREE SPEECH AGAIN QUASHED AT HARVARD  |  October 21, 2009
    It should come as no surprise to readers of “Freedom Watch” that yet another instance of political, intellectual, and academic censorship has sprung up at Harvard, the self-touted pinnacle of higher education.
  •   THE GATES CASE ISN'T ABOUT RACE  |  August 05, 2009
    The weeks-long hubbub over the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr. by the Cambridge Police Department has centered on race, understandably, for two reasons: 1) the African-American population has suffered inequitably in its relations with law enforcement across this country, and 2) a race story is easier for the media to tell — and to sell.
  •   MUZZLE AWARDS: COLLEGIATE DIVISION  |  July 10, 2009
    In a 1957 Supreme Court decision upholding the free-speech rights of university professors ( Sweezy v. New Hampshire ), Justice Felix Frankfurter quoted prominent South African scholars on the importance of academic freedom.
  •   GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY  |  June 24, 2009
    The US Supreme Court's June 18 decision denying prisoners access to DNA testing — a procedure that could reliably prove innocence — adds to the high court's decades-long shameful record on criminal-justice issues.
  •   ROBOJUDGE  |  June 11, 2009
    Judge Stephen Breyer, Bill Clinton's latest pick for the Supreme Court, has attracted support so broad that it spans ideological and political differences.  

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group