The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Raising Hill

Hillary Clinton’s ‘aura of inevitability’ might hide her weaknesses — at least until the Republicans get their hands on her
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  September 12, 2007

070914_hilltron_main
MELTING THE ICE QUEEN: Clinton’s breaking down her negative image and winning over voters on the campaign trail.

Queen Hillary: Dynasties? Americans love ’em when Heather Locklear or Michael Jordan is involved. But will they embrace the Clintons?
Hillary Clinton took only two questions from the audience at the end of her 35-minute speech at the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) conference in Boston this past Friday, and one of them hit her exactly where her Democratic opponents want her hit: Clinton’s disastrous, failed attempt to reform health-care coverage in her husband’s first term. Health care is the AARP’s No. 1 political issue these days, and aside from the Iraq War, probably the biggest topic among Democrats nationwide. Clinton’s botched attempt, in the view of many, set the health-care-reform agenda back 15 years.

But Clinton’s lengthy response to the question was the highlight of her talk, judging by comments afterward from a number of people in attendance. Clinton leaned her right elbow on the podium and cocked her head toward the audience, as she often does, conveying an informality and casualness that belies her public image of a cold, calculating ice queen. When she does this, she peppers her lines with “well” and “you know,” making her remarks seem off-the-cuff, even when she has delivered them — as she has answered this specific question — repeatedly on the campaign trail.

The 1993–94 reform effort revealed her political inexperience at the time, Clinton explained to the questioner. She did not know then how to maneuver bills through the jungle of Washington — terrain she has now spent 15 years mastering. Instead of anger at what she once called the “vast, right-wing conspiracy,” she displayed bemusement at her own naïveté; at her failure to realize that her plan to simplify the system, reduce costs, and increase individual freedom would be vilified as hopelessly complex, massively expensive, and Orwellian-ly restrictive.

Now that she knows how to negotiate the Washington process, Clinton continued, she was ready to take on forces like the drug companies and the insurance industry, who are prepared to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to protect the status quo against any change — and suddenly she had squared her shoulders and was speaking with crisp precision, turning her head left and right in the posture we have learned, in this teleprompter age, to identify with speechifying of great political import. The audience of roughly 3000 (another 3000 watched in spillover areas) went wild.

“She seems approachable,” Christine Young, a nurse from Salt Lake City, said after the AARP speech. “She seems like a warmer person than I expected.” Attendees from Maine, Connecticut, New York, and Kansas gave similar reviews.

This kind of lemonade-from-lemons trick is just killing her competitors for the Democratic Party presidential nomination, none of whom accepted invitations to speak at the AARP event. A Barack Obama staffer told the Phoenix this week of the campaign’s frustration that Clinton has been able to bill herself as the best candidate to drive the health-care-reform agenda, because of her experience screwing it up last time. (A more blunt Obama advisor bitched to the New Yorker on this point that “I’m sure George Bush learned how not to invade Iraq. Should we then trust him to invade Iran?”)

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Pushing to replace Bush, Suffrage net city, Profile polling, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Massachusetts, Mitt Romney, John McCain,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Raising Hill
John Edwards, out of office since Jan. '05, has nothing left to lose in 2008. He may do whatever it takes to get the nomination that's likely available to him for the last time. He's wearing the union label to re-invent himself as the candidate who spoke eloquently and accurately about "the two Americas" - those that got and those that don't - in '04. Rhetoric that fell strangely silent after he became Kerry's running mate. While there's some apparent disconnect between organized labor and the workers whom they could potentially organize - whether salaried, hourly, daily-pay or piece-meal - Edwards could build bridges 'tween the two. Also, not many candidates are actively solicitng votes from low-and-moderate income earners. A strong primary showing by Edwards could result in - if not a place on the ticket - his perhaps being named Secretary of Labor in an incoming Democratic administration. A fitting sequel to his now being Director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina.
By L-J on 09/13/2007 at 2:54:39
Raising Hill
Many red-blooded Americans let steam build up till it shoots out of their ears and they stomp their hooves in rage when their nostrils sniff out "inevitability" in a political candidate. From an upper-middle-class, chilly and mirthless middle-aged white woman who's also a Wellesley grad, no less. Hillary does herself no favors amongst the general electorate when she grandly uses "inevitability" as an omen to warn off pretenders and contenders while also seeking to sway susceptible voters. Most lesser worthies - "moi?" well, I nevah! - delight in upsetting the rich folks' apple cart, cheer for an upset and like to see sure-fire predictions proven wrong. She's setting herself up for a fall. And more than a few people - mostly white guys, one might add - are licking their chops as they rub their hands in gleeful anticipation of her "inevitability" ending up in the loss column.
By L-J on 09/14/2007 at 7:54:49
Raising Hill
look dipshit - it aint Hillary saying she's "inevitable"...its the frigging polls of democratic voters. what a moronic column and an even dumber comment by L-J where did ya find these clowns? at Kos at 4 am scribbling to the dozens...theyre heart felt smarty-ness?! ha!
By dem dem on 09/14/2007 at 2:05:09

ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   LADIES' MAN  |  November 18, 2009
    Early last week, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government announced suddenly that Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, would speak at a forum that Friday afternoon.
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? NO, HE HASN'T  |  November 12, 2009
    Barack Obama's popularity should not be judged by the day-to-day, media-driven vagaries of politics — nor by the wishful thinking of his opponents.
  •   THE QUIET STORM  |  November 04, 2009
    In recent weeks, Governor Deval Patrick has been receiving some of his best press in a long time — which is to say, he’s gotten very little coverage at all.
  •   TAKING SIDES  |  November 04, 2009
    The stakes are high in the battle for Massachusetts’s first new US senatorship in a quarter-century.
  •   HOLDING HIS PUNCHES  |  October 21, 2009
    All year, Boston’s political observers have been watching for signs of an anti-Menino tipping point in the mayoral race.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group