The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Southern discomfort

Anti-press overreach in the Sun Belt. Plus, the strange resilience of Page Six editor Richard Johnson
By ADAM REILLY  |  October 26, 2007

071026_newtimes_main
IRON MIKE LACEY: He fought the law, and the law lost

Nice and easy
Following the October 18 arrests of Village Voice Media executives Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin, more than 50 papers belonging to the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies — including the Phoenix — agreed to post links to sites revealing Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's home address, the publication of which made PhoenixNew Times a grand-jury target. For a list, go to aan.org. The shreiff's address (which is 12808 North Via Del Sol, Fountain Hills) is easily found at zabasearch
Here in Boston, media observers waxed indignant when a judge barred a local TV station from reporting the autopsy results of two Boston firefighters earlier this month. And rightfully so: the prior-restraint ruling by Suffolk Superior Court Judge Merita Hopkins, which was promptly overturned, was a model of bad jurisprudence. But a pair of recent developments in the Sun Belt serves as a useful reminder that antagonism between government and the press can get a whole lot nastier.

The first case, and the better-known of the two, involves the October 18 misdemeanor arrests in Arizona of Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin, the executive editor and CEO, respectively, of Village Voice Media (VVM). Their crime: reporting, in a cover story in the VVM-owned alt-weekly Phoenix New Times, on legally protected details of an ongoing grand-jury investigation of the paper — including a subpoena request for information (IP addresses, domain names, “cookie” data, etc.) on every single individual who’d looked at the paper’s Web site since 2004. That investigation, in turn, stemmed from a July 2004 article on the real-estate holdings of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a long-time New Times nemesis and a native of Springfield, Massachusetts.

Arpaio is a conservative crank beloved, in certain quarters, for “reinstating the chain gang, making inmates wear pink underwear, and putting convicted criminals in tents in the desert to ease overcrowding,” as a Lou Dobbs Tonight correspondent approvingly put it. After noting, in the July 2004 story, that information on several Arpaio properties was redacted from state records due to an alleged threat to Arpaio’s life, New Times mocked the claim — and, for good measure, published Arpaio’s home address, asking: “Why shouldn’t Old Man Joe be in the same glass house as the rest of us?” Disclosing that online could have been illegal in Arizona — but only if a genuine threat to Arpaio or his family existed, and if that threat was “reasonably apparent” to New Times. (For its part, New Times subsequently noted that Arpaio’s address could easily be located elsewhere on the Web.)

New Times’ October 18 story on these and other details of the grand-jury investigation proved to be a strategic masterstroke. The next day, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas announced that his office was dropping all charges against New Times; panned special prosecutor Dennis Wilenchik for trying to arrange a private meeting with the judge overseeing the grand jury; and announced Wilenchik’s dismissal. Overnight, Larkin and Lacey went from wronged martyrs to vindicated heroes. “This really is a win for the Constitution,” Lacey announced, according to the Arizona Republic. That’s for sure.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: NYC’s alternative crisis, Home of the Braves?, Culture war, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Celebrity News, freedom of speech, first amendment,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Southern discomfort
There's a reason MA and a few other states have real estate trusts as optional forms of ownership. People (usually young)without assets enjoy tormenting those (usually old)who have them. The rights of freedom of the press carry with them inconvenient responsibilities that some folks like to cherrypick. If I wanted to publicize personal information on media people with whom I had a beef, because I CLAIMED it was relevant, should I do that with impunity? Judgment and maturity are often gained over more time than some journos have in the trenches. A lot of people have been gratuitously hurt in the name of the US Constitution. I do wonder how some people sleep at night.
By rickinduxbury on 10/25/2007 at 12:04:59
Southern discomfort
Richard Johnson's aapproach to reporting gossip, though wicked and unscruplous, is really small potatoes when viewed in the largely hidden context of what goes on in NYC media circles. Johnson's antics pale compared to the coverup of the vehicular homocide that claimed the life of young David Johnson in 1969 and left his mother Chendra crippled for life. The driver of the car was was Richard Oliver, a rising star reportor at the New York Daily News who would eventually become the paper's metropolitan editor. A well orchestrated coverup by members of the DN staff helped Oliver skate from any meaningful justice. In the years that followed Oliver showed himself to be a racist and a thug---and many other staff reporters always wondered what was the leverage that Oliver had with his bosses, particulary editor Michael J. O'Neill. Some of the outright corruption was exposed in Hardy et al vs. New York News Inc.---a federal discrimination trial that ended on April 15, 1987 with a mostly white jury ruling that the DN had discriminated against four black journalists. During and after the trial, the New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe and Columbia Journalism Review carried out a journalistic lynching of the plaintiffs while ignoring the facts presented to the jury. The coverage from all the forementioned entities was rife with conflicts of interest, the least of them being that Oliver and others exposed as racists where at varying times on the faculty of the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
By JerseyDave on 10/29/2007 at 3:12:48

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.
  •   THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING ERNIE  |  October 19, 2009
    Media feuds don’t come any nastier than the metastasizing spat between Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr and one “Ernie Boch III,” the pseudonymous blogger at the liberal Web site Blue Mass. Group. (Note: the blogger is no relation to the car dealer.)
  •   LATTER DAY TAINT  |  October 10, 2009
    Fifteen years ago, Glenn Beck was a small-market DJ with a drinking problem, no friends, and bleak professional prospects. Today, he’s a Fox News superstar averaging 2.4 million viewers, an inexorably successful author, and the leader of a popular movement that condemns government in general and President Barack Obama in particular.
  •   PHILADELPHIA STORY  |  October 01, 2009
    The local-media story line of the moment is the push by Stephen Taylor — Milton resident, Yale media lecturer, and former Boston Globe executive VP — to recapture the paper his family ran for more than a century, a goal he's pursuing with the backing of (among others) his cousin Benjamin Taylor, the former Globe publisher.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group