First, Clinton and Reagan got to run against unpopular incumbents. McCain is not George Bush — no matter how much Obama may try to tie the two together.
Second, in both 1992 and 1980, there were significant third-party candidacies (H. Ross Perot and John Anderson, respectively). Like most Independent candidacies, their ire was aimed primarily at the status quo (and thus the incumbent), changing the dynamic of the race. These third-party candidacies also made it easier for the insurgent to win without having to concentrate on getting 50 percent of the vote in every state. That pattern seems unlikely to be replicated this year.
Democrats have been reassuring themselves that, so far, their poor showing in the national match-ups against McCain is because their party is currently divided in a bitter primary struggle that will be resolved by the time the fall campaign begins. And, by then, the electorate will know Obama better.
But all these precedents add up to suggest that if Obama becomes our 44th president, the 2008 campaign will define a new American electoral era, with a new set of patterns. Obama’s supporters have been promising that their movement will revolutionize our politics. If they’re going to win, they’d better be right.
THE FIELD
REPUBLICANS
JOHN McCAIN
The nominee
DEMOCRATS
BARACK OBAMA
Odds: 1-4 | past week: 2-3
HILLARY CLINTON
Odds: 4-1 | 3-2
DELEGATE COUNT
BARACK OBAMA
Pledged: 1414
Superdelegates: 214
Total: 1628
Short by: 397
HILLARY CLINTON
Pledged: 1247
Superdelegates: 250
Total: 1497
Short by: 528
Delegates needed to win: 2025
SOURCE: REAL CLEAR POLITICS AS OF 3/26/08
On the Web
The Presidential Tote Board blog: http://www.thephoenix.com/toteboard