The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Biolab follies

By ADAM REILLY  |  April 7, 2008

But is it a question of race, or of expertise? After all, ever since the beginning, biolab opponents have had to contend with impressively credentialed scientists — including representatives of the NIH — who promised that the facility would be safe. The reason the NRC’s finding made waves is because it involved other credentialed scientists ruling that these assurances had been shoddy and unconvincing.

“I think it’s about race when they’re placing [these facilities],” Allen answered. “Because I’m talking to people nationally, in twelve other states. The majority of those folks who are fighting are people of color. I think it was racial when we were trying to get the word out, and nobody would listen to a word we were saying, except for a chosen few.”

Allen may be frustrated by what she considers a lack of respect. But she’s also using this frustration as a motivational force. At one point, she cited a comment she claims was made by Mark Klempner, the biolab’s director, at a meeting several years ago. According to Allen, Klempner called the biolab opponents “incompetent.” (Klempner has since stated that he doesn’t remember making the alleged remark.) “If Klempner would have treated us with respect, if he would have answered our questions, we would have been like, ‘Biolab? These people seem like they’re cool, and we don’t know shit,’ ” says Allen. “We would have just went to the meetings, done what we had to do, maybe put up a little fight here and there.

“[But] you just don’t call a person ‘incompetent’ in a room of 90 and then expect for that person to walk away,” Allen continued. “And if that’s what you expect, then that’s a pretty good understanding of why you think this lab should be here. Because [you think] these people aren’t competent. [You think] they’re sucking 40s every day; they’re smoking blunts every day; they’re really not aware; we got ’em working three and four jobs; their kids are getting shot left and right; everything is going on pretty well. And we can plop this puppy in here.”

In fairness to biolab proponents, one problem with this theory is that it ignores the complexity of the biolab’s immediate environment. Roxbury — which sits to the south and west — is, as Allen suggests, filled with lower-income, nonwhite residents. But just to the north are the vast swaths of the South End that have become urban playgrounds for affluent whites. And the manses of the Back Bay aren’t much further away, either.

Still, the notion that there’s something nefariously racist behind the biolab is prevalent among opponents of the project. “I liken it to the Dred Scott decision,” Mel King, the South End activist, former mayoral candidate, and plaintiff in the federal case, told me. (In that case, King and other South End residents are represented by the Boston-based Conservation Law Foundation.) “Those two black folks were told by the white court that they had no rights that they had to respect. And there’s no other way for me to understand how this has worked, other than that the people in the area had no rights that needed to be respected.”

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |   next >
Related: Senior years, Fiedler on the spot, Are universities selling out to oil nations?, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Deval Patrick, Mel King, Boston Public Health Commission,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Biolab follies
I don't mind a properly contructedf BL4 lab, I with the one in my back yard (Galveston) was properly constructed! The problem is that the "security personnel" guarding the facility don't have the moxy to draw their useless service weapons (if they are even armed) and shoot an intruder. These facilites have no defense in depth, no perimeter security and are susceptable to release of contents with an OK city style bomb! Look at the picture of BUs building and put the image of the post-blast Murrow building on top of it. Not a pretty picture!
By Forensics on 04/03/2008 at 2:45:56
Biolab follies
I've been opposing the lab for years for some of the reasons outlined in the NRC study. The fact while it would be very nice to cure Ebola for the people of Zaire, this is highly high priority research for the middle of Boston. Given the economy is going down the toilet, there is no national health insurance. Our infrastructure is crumbling, one would expect that the cost benefit should be elsewhere. Even if it is the case that this facility proves safe the BSL4 infectious disease facility is a waste of money as there is not the competence to prevent the use of bioweapons. Moreover a poor country does not have the money to develop an effective weapon and delivery system, a dirty bomb is much cheaper more controlled and easier to develop. This effort is more insanity brought forth by the Bush Administration and nobody is likely to Waste this money on the city of Boston. The other side of the coin is the two senators from your state have worked hard to prevent a windmill farm 5 50 ten miles off the cost of Nantucket Harbor because the hachtsmen might have to see windmills miles out to sea. As George Orwell mentioned, all pigs are created equal but evidently the citizens of Nantucket are more equal than others.
By mike1947 on 04/03/2008 at 9:42:40
Biolab follies
Yes, they met with the community many times. But at each of those meetings the answer to nearly every question was either "yes, it's safe, trust me" or "I can't answer that." Just because you repeat it "hundreds" of times, doesn't mean you actually /say/ anything.
By Just a Guy on 04/05/2008 at 11:59:59

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GOAL RUSH!  |  December 02, 2009
    Get two journalists in a room these days, and before the conversation is five minutes old they'll probably be kvetching about the grim state of the news business. Unless, that is, they happen to be sports journalists, in which case the conversation will likely focus on how absurdly bright the future looks. Especially here in Boston.
  •   GREG EPSTEIN, ATHEIST SUPERSTAR  |  November 24, 2009
    Once an intellectual taboo, atheism has become one of the great growth industries of the third millennium.
  •   UNMAKING A BAD FEDERAL LAW  |  November 24, 2009
    It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group