The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Leggo my ego!

By ADAM REILLY  |  July 30, 2008

This acknowledgment isn’t absent from the current drumbeat, exactly. Before positing that the gap between Obama’s self-regard and actual achievements was uniquely wide, for example, Krauthammer allowed that “there’s nothing new about narcissism in politics.” And before asserting that Obama looks in the mirror and sees JFK, not just a future president, Vennochi conceded that there’s “no such thing as a humble politician.”

Given the stakes, however — not to mention the gravity of the accusation — a little more analytical rigor would be nice. Suppose, just for the sake of the argument, that Obama really does look in the mirror and see JFK. Now recall what George W. Bush allegedly said prior to officially launching his first campaign, according to Stephen Mansfield’s 2003 book The Faith of George W. Bush. “I feel like God wants me to run for president,” Mansfield claims Bush told Texas evangelist James Robison. “I can’t explain it, but I sense my country is going to need me. Something is going to happen . . . I know it won’t be easy, on me or my family, but God wants me to do it.” Remember, too, how Mitt Romney — who may be McCain’s pick for V-P — explained his sons’ lack of military service in August 2007: “One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president.” Who’s the biggest narcissist?

And then, finally, there’s the “uppity” problem. In June, MSNBC reporter Courtney Hazlett described Spike Lee’s behavior in a recent spat with fellow filmmaker Clint Eastwood as “uppity.” Hazlett subsequently apologized to Lee, saying she “know[s] words can have a strong impact” and “chose [her] words poorly.” This may strike some readers as an example of craven PC tendencies run amok. The fact remains, though, that the archetype of the uppity black who doesn’t know his or her place is a pernicious one, comparable in tone and impact with that of the greedy Jew or the lazy Mexican. (One usage example from the second edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, drawn from the 1952 history The Big Change: America Transforms Itself, 1900–1950: “The effect of the automobile revolution was especially noticeable in the South, where one began to hear whites complain about ‘uppity niggers’ on the highways, where there was no Jim Crow.”)

Of course, McCain didn’t call Obama “uppity” in the aforementioned speech. Krauthammer didn’t use the word; neither did Vennochi or Klein. When I asked Vennochi if she’d considered the possible association between her critique and that term, she offered an impassioned “no.” “Over the years I have described any number of white politicians, Democratic and Republican, as arrogant and egotistical,” Vennochi told me via e-mail. “Just go back and read my ’04 columns about John Kerry; or my columns about Mitt Romney, or Bill Weld. So I find the ‘uppity’ storyline not only offensive, but really, really wrong.”

Fair enough. But any time a pundit decides to play amateur psychologist and concludes that Obama has an ego problem, or a narcissism problem, or an arrogance problem, those terms are going to evoke uppityness in a certain segment of readers or viewers or listeners. Here’s how Huffington Post blogger John Ridley put it in June, following former-Bush-consigliere-turned-pundit Karl Rove’s description of Obama as “the guy at the country club with the beautiful date, holding a martini and a cigarette, that stands against the wall and makes snide comments about everyone”:

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Best in show, O Positive, How's Obama doing?, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Mitt Romney, John Kerry, William Weld,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Leggo my ego!
I couldn't agree with you more --in fact,  I agree with you practically word for word as evidenced in my comment in DK's MediaNation blog yesterday morning.  Actually, it's more like you agreed with me practically word for word.  But the message is all. GrubStreet NM
By GrubStreetNM on 07/31/2008 at 12:19:40
Re: Leggo my ego!
i think the junior senator from illinois' colleagues in the state legislature would agree with the notion of his ego, as would some of his cohort at harvard, yet what politico is egoless? the problem with senator obama is his lack of a substantive track record. achivements for him are really marginal. he remains a risk, and let's hope, 'yes we can', may evolve into, 'do no harm'. 
By jeffmcnary on 07/31/2008 at 12:55:41
Re: Leggo my ego!
i think the junior senator from illinois' colleagues in the state legislature would agree with the notion of his ego being larger than most, as would some of his cohort at harvard, yet what politico is egoless? the problem with senator obama is his lack of a substantive track record. achivements for him are really marginal. he remains a risk, and let's hope, 'yes we can', may evolve into, 'do no harm'. 
By jeffmcnary on 07/31/2008 at 12:56:36
Re: Leggo my ego!
GrubStreet, I'm glad the article resonates with your own thoughts. Just so you know, this piece was wrapped up well before you posted at Media Nation.
By Adam Reilly on 07/31/2008 at 1:40:19
Re: Leggo my ego!
Adam, thanks.  How weird is THAT! Leslie
By GrubStreetNM on 07/31/2008 at 1:49:12
Re: Leggo my ego!
Full disclosure obligates me to state that this article was recommended to me by Frank Reilly, Adam's father, in the context of a conversation we were having about Obama's candidacy. I found Adam's article perceptive and very revealing. That said, I was unaware that the "narcissistic liberal" has a history within conservative criticism as a theme or perhaps a smear. Very enlightening: same old, same old. I feel better already. Thank you, Adam.
By awalzer@umn.edu on 08/02/2008 at 1:14:27

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GOAL RUSH!  |  December 02, 2009
    Get two journalists in a room these days, and before the conversation is five minutes old they'll probably be kvetching about the grim state of the news business. Unless, that is, they happen to be sports journalists, in which case the conversation will likely focus on how absurdly bright the future looks. Especially here in Boston.
  •   GREG EPSTEIN, ATHEIST SUPERSTAR  |  November 24, 2009
    Once an intellectual taboo, atheism has become one of the great growth industries of the third millennium.
  •   UNMAKING A BAD FEDERAL LAW  |  November 24, 2009
    It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group