The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Odium at the podium

By STEVEN STARK  |  September 25, 2008

So, in this election, what could constitute a gaffe differs for each candidate, depending on the circumstances. For McCain, anything in his performance that indicates he’s too old, he’s unprepared to deal with the economy, or he’s a traditional Republican could end up being devastating for him. And for Obama, anything that smacks of his being too imperious, inexperienced, pliable, or, in truth, too liberal, could spell trouble. Sarah Palin’s Achilles-heel million-dollar question is the same as Quayle and Ford’s before her: does she display enough acumen for the job? For Joe Biden, the problem will be the one he always has: will he put his foot in his mouth and dominate post-debate discussion that way?

3) Visuals can steal the show
A debate is first and foremost a television show; how one acts is frequently as important as what one says. (“Action is character,” wrote F. Scott Fitzgerald.) Although the visual advantage JFK had over a poorly made-up Richard Nixon has been exaggerated, the truth is that Kennedy always looked marvelous on TV, and anyone appearing in a studio with him instantly paled by comparison. (Ditto for Reagan.)

In the past, visuals have played out in different ways. Al Gore couldn’t help sighing during George W. Bush’s turns in the first debate in 2000, leaving the impression among some that he was a bit of a boor. When George H.W. Bush looked at his watch during the town-hall debate of 1992, it sent a clear message about what he thought of having to deal with the public — and it wasn’t a good one.

In this year’s debates, the public will assess the age issue visually: does Obama appear too young (or inexperienced) or McCain too old? And, as in other years, voters will try to come to terms with what it would be like to have this leader as a constant TV companion for four years.

Voters have doubts as to whether Obama has the experience and background to be president, and whether the change he offers is too radical. With McCain, the doubts are about whether he’s over the hill and offers enough change. The candidate who uses these appearances to deal with the misgivings voters have about his candidacy is likely to emerge as the winner in November.

To read the “Presidential Tote Board” blog, go to thePhoenix.com/blogs/toteboard. Steven Stark can be reached at sds@starkwriting.com.

JOHN MCCAIN
Odds: 6-7 │ this past week: same
BARACK OBAMA
Odds: 7-6 │ this past week: same

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Obama and McCain: Repro Rights Checklist, Captain chaos, Going Dutch, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Michael Dukakis, Barack Obama, Barack Obama,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Message from the Author: The Odds Have Changed to Obama!
     With the financial tidal wave hitting the McCain campaign, the odds are shifting. McCain is hardly in the terrible position most of the media are positing. But he is now in a position where something has to change to give him the tail wind he needs to win. It could come from the debates; it could come from an improvement in the economic situation. But as of today, Obama is now a narrow 6-7 favorite to win the presidency,
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 9:38:37
Re: Odium at the podium
not only would it be a sorry day for the republic, but particularly for harvard law, the legal system, and the entities which spawn practitioners of that trade when one of their own goes down in rhetorical combat to a sailor, albeit a naval officer. with less than 40 days left in this outting, what these 'debates' will show is a tired, gray gentleman facing yesterday in contrast to an avant garde, articulate visionary. the two stand in sharp relief to one another. they entire thing could be done with the candidates using sock-puppets and mouthing the words. laissez le bon temps rouler...or let's just say anchors a-way, yes?
By jeffmcnary on 09/25/2008 at 12:02:44
Re: Odium at the podium
"Avant-garde, articulate visionary" says it perfectly, Mr McNary (not to mention ("laissez le bons temps rouler"!). Like Coltrane, Obama is a major African-American intellectual. The question is, does he play something gentle like "Naima," or go all out with "A Love Supreme."
By gordon marshall on 09/25/2008 at 12:26:50
Re: Odium at the podium// Author Correction
 One small correctio, pointed out by an astute reader. We don't have to go all the way back to 1928 to find two candidates with no connection to an incumbent administration, etc. In 1952, the Eisenhower-Stevenson race offered a similar choice. 
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 1:55:32
Re: Odium at the podium// Author Correction
 One small correction, pointed out by an astute reader. We don't have to go all the way back to 1928 to find two candidates with no connection to an incumbent administration, etc. In 1952, the Eisenhower-Stevenson race offered a similar choice. 
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 1:55:58
Author correction
 A sharp reader points out that it wasn't 1928 when we last had two candidates unconnected to any present or former incumbent administration -- it was 1952. My apologies.
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 2:14:33
Re: Author correction
An astute reader points out that the last time two candidates with no connection to any incumbent administrations last faced off wasn't in 1928; it was 1952.
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 2:28:31
Re: Odium at the podium
 
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 3:02:06
Author Correction
 An astute reader points out that the last campaign with two candidates not connected to any incumbent administration wasn't 1928 -- it was 1952. Correction noted!  
By Steven Stark on 09/25/2008 at 3:41:05
Author's Correction
 An astute reader points out that the last race in which we had two candidates with no ties to a present or past incumbent was not in 1928 but in 1952.My apologies!
By Steven Stark on 09/26/2008 at 2:21:47

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group