The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Rolled

By ADAM REILLY  |  October 2, 2008

Take the case of John Wise, a national editor for MyFox, a subsection of Fox News. On September 4, the convention’s last night, Wise and a colleague left the Fox tent to cover a developing protest. He ended up moving back and forth over a series of bridges in downtown St. Paul, usually in response to police orders, shooting stills and video as police-launched weaponry detonated in the background. In the process, he formed a surprisingly good picture of the protesters. (“I’m not just trying to be some liberal journalist,” Wise tells the Phoenix, “but I did not see one protester get violent, break anything, throw anything at anybody, anything like that. People were wanting to get away, but that’s natural — they were scared.”)

Eventually, Wise ended up in a crowd of several hundred people on the Marion Street bridge, which was promptly sealed off by police on both the northern and southern ends. As the police began to make arrests, Wise recalls members of the press were promised that they’d be processed quickly and allowed to leave. Instead, his credentials and camera bag were confiscated; then he was taken to Ramsey County Jail, where he spent the night before being released early the following morning.

As you might expect, given his employer, Wise is no Amy Goodman. Nor does he come across as a passionate defender of press freedoms. But what he saw and experienced at the RNC seems to have given him pause.

“Why were some journalists arrested and some weren’t?” Wise asks. “Once things calmed down on the bridge, why were certain people told some things while other people were told other things? I’m not the biggest preacher of this amendment or that one. But something that’s very eye-opening, like what happened to me in St. Paul, will make you take a bit more of a stance.”

Unsettling as Wise’s experience may have been, he had it easy compared with Matt Rourke and Evan Vucci, two AP photographers who ran into trouble on the night of September 1. According to a letter that David Tomlin, the AP’s associate general counsel, sent to St. Paul police chief John Harrington, Rourke — who’d been following a violent splinter group of protesters on September 1 — was tackled from behind by a police officer and bloodied in the process. Then, he was arrested. (When he was released, without being charged, 10 hours later, at 2 am, a bystander quipped that he must be “well-connected.”)

Vucci, who was working near Rourke on September 1, was picked up from behind and thrown to the ground, an action that broke his camera. After he followed orders and rolled onto his stomach, he was kicked in the ribs and then cuffed. Ultimately, after showing his credentials, he was allowed to leave the area without being detained.

In his letter to Harrington, Tomlin contrasted the treatment of Rourke and Vucci with the three-hour detention, on September 4, of reporters Amy Forliti and Jon Krawczynski (who, like Wise, were arrested on the Marion Street bridge). Journalists covering this sort of story risk being detained, Tomlin acknowledged. But Rourke and Vucci weren’t given a chance to leave or peacefully submit to detention: “Instead, they were victims of unprovoked, gratuitously violent, and seemingly malicious attacks by officers whose lawful mission that day was to contain violence, not to add to it.” Tomlin’s letter was sent on September 5; as of this writing, according to Minnesota and Wisconsin AP bureau chief Dave Pyle, the St. Paul Police Department has yet to respond.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Among the Republican thugs, Judge dismisses RNC protest case, Wacko patrol: America's 25 scariest conservatives, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama, Politics, Domestic Policy,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Rolled
Most of what you say is spot-on, as far as it goes. But why should we journalists have more rights than the people who were demonstrating. As in New York four years ago, so, it appears, in St. Paul: scores of people were arrested, and some roughed up in the process, for exercising their constitutional rights. In New York, the police were found to have lied in arrest reports and affidavits. And the authorities have admitted that they infiltrated anti-war organizations--as if being against the war and wanting to say so publicly is somehow dangerous and unlawful.So, yes, we should be outraged that reporters have been such timid watchdogs. But we should also be outraged at the larger issue: that speaking out has been turned into a criminal offense.
By squattercity on 10/02/2008 at 1:29:01
Photographers' rights and th erosion freedom of the press - WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE
It's terrible what's happening to freedom of the press - and the press is too embarrassed, scared, busy or naive  to make it an issue. But these civil rights abuses are occurring with alarming frequency. Carlos Miller at http://photographyisnotacrime.org  is tracking them. This is something that affects more than just journalists as nearly everybody has a digital camera on their hip or in their phone. Many do take photos of police - and for that act they are often charged with resisting arrest (same charge as most of the journalist at the RNC and DNC). Before these police transgressions were brushed aside as it was he said/she said and police authority almost always won - today these abuses are documented. We need the journalists to use their bully pulipit, while they still have one, to stand up for themselves and their fellow watchdogs - the millions of Americans with no axe to grind but who carry a camera, or a video camera.  
By enhager on 10/02/2008 at 3:02:56
Re: Rolled
Thanks for your comment, SC. My point is that journalists need to protect our constitutional rights and customary privileges so we can keep documenting the use and abuse of government power--which, as I say in the piece, is the most important thing we do.I don't want to see anyone's First Amendment rights violated. But if that *does* happen, I want to make sure that reporters and photographers are there to catch it and fill me in. It's a tricky dynamic: our legal rights are the same as the general public's, but our social role is different. And in the end, the best way for us to guard the public's rights is to make sure we can keep doing our jobs.
By Adam Reilly on 10/02/2008 at 3:39:15
Re: Rolled
Tried responding before, SC, but I'm not sure it worked, so here's a short reply: the public is only going to know about government misbehavior if journalists can tell them. That's why I want the press to jealously safeguard both its constitutional rights (which, when it comes to newsgathering, are the same as the general public's First Amendment rights) and any customary privileges (e.g., quick release for journalists caught up in law-enforcement sweeps). 
By Adam Reilly on 10/02/2008 at 3:57:38
Re: Rolled
Sorry for not reading your article Adam, but the photo and caption said it all.
By gordon marshall on 10/03/2008 at 1:23:24
Re: Rolled
I've wondered about this 'same' question myself, "Why so little media coverage of the harassment and bully arrests of journalists at the Republican Convention?".  Makes you wonder.  It's not safe to speak out against the right-wing.  And you think facism doesn't exist in this country?  Think again.
By Chelsea Hoffman on 10/03/2008 at 11:49:17
Re: Rolled
This is patently absurd and America has become a police state:From Chris King's 1st Amendment page:
Adam Reilly’s sidebar "Rolled," quotes Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press’ (RCFP’s) Lucy Dalglish as saying that Goodman “went too far,” but in reality all she did was ask a cop about her arrested reporters, who too were probably arrested without Just Cause. She had full press credentials, of course.

Again, watch the video closely: The cop lets her walk past him initially so she has no idea that she is subject to arrest. Then she stands back from him with her hand up in a defensive position and tries to ask him a simple question. It takes him all of 4 seconds to put his hands on her and he never lets go, even as she is explaining her credentials and that she is simply trying to find her staff. Then without ever letting go of her even as they are heading toward the “safe zone” he sua sponte drags her back the other direction and arrests her. She is not forcibly resisting him at all. At. All.

Implicit in Dalglish’s statement is the notion that you are supposed to get ready to be arrested for politely asking a police officer “what’s up?” It’s absurd. A buddy of mine in Ohio resisted an Unlawful Arrest and told a cop to go to hell and that he was a real *ssh*le and that is protected speech. See State v. Sansalone, 71 Ohio App. 3d 284 (1991). And what else do I know about wrongful arrest? I helped my boss, Terry Gilbert, author the successful flag burner appeal in State v. Lessin, 67 Ohio State 3d 487 (1993) and got two cops in Hamilton, Ohio adjudicated as making Michael Isreal a victim of violent crime (V1996-61481), won his criminal case before an all-white jury and settled his civil case for $58,500.00 even though he had no visible injuries. Unlike Michael Paulhus in Nashua, NH who got shot and still only got $80K.
By KingCast on 10/04/2008 at 6:42:15
Re: Rolled
Read my comment on this matter over at the Main story, but my point is, chiefly, that Amy Goodman didn't deserve to be arrested. I have litigated these types of issues and watched the video closely, and what happened is patently absurd, as I noted yesterday at Chris King's 1st Amendment Page. This is but one example of America's Police State. 
By KingCast on 10/04/2008 at 7:13:48
Re: Rolled
Seems to me the media is in bed with the gov't is in bed with big business. Can the remaining honest reporters do anything about it, or do we need to send a message via the Batsignal?
By CazmoP on 10/07/2008 at 6:54:44

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GOAL RUSH!  |  December 02, 2009
    Get two journalists in a room these days, and before the conversation is five minutes old they'll probably be kvetching about the grim state of the news business. Unless, that is, they happen to be sports journalists, in which case the conversation will likely focus on how absurdly bright the future looks. Especially here in Boston.
  •   GREG EPSTEIN, ATHEIST SUPERSTAR  |  November 24, 2009
    Once an intellectual taboo, atheism has become one of the great growth industries of the third millennium.
  •   UNMAKING A BAD FEDERAL LAW  |  November 24, 2009
    It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
  •   HOLY TERROR?  |  November 16, 2009
    On the afternoon of November 5, Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a building at Fort Hood, the sprawling military base in central Texas; sat briefly in solitary silence; and then opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol, shooting roughly a hundred rounds and killing 12 soldiers and one civilian.
  •   DIFFERENCE OF OPINION  |  November 09, 2009
    It’s been three months since Peter Canellos replaced Renée Loth as editor of the Boston Globe ’s editorial page.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group