The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Gen Jones rules

By STEVEN STARK  |  March 19, 2009

Gen X is, after all, the generation that created much of our modern tech world — YouTube, Wikipedia, and Yahoo. It's not necessarily technology that "saves the world," à la visionary Boomer Steve Jobs, but practical stuff one can really use.

So far, so good. But what people have tended to forget are some of the critiques of the cultural leanings of Obama's generation.

Long ago, former New York Times columnist Russell Baker was one of the first to notice that a generation that grows up hooked on the latest technology tends to suffer from "herky-jerky brain" — or what others might characterize as a generation-wide case of attention deficit disorder. In their book Generations, William Strauss and Neil Howe also describe how other generations often find the members of this generation "frenetic," "slippery," or rather empty — driven more by ambition than anything else. Strauss and Howe relate how the drug of choice for some of the males of this generation has been steroids — literally a physical manifestation of all the pumped-up hype with which they surround themselves.

During the campaign, we heard all about the positive aspects of generational change. Are the negative ones now coming into focus? After all, the most well-known Gen-Xers who have preceded Obama onto the world stage were notorious for their uncanny powers of self-promotion that, in the end, represented style more than substance. There was Princess Di (born the same year as Obama) or even Michael Jordan (born two years later and, now that he no longer plays basketball, known mostly for his shoes).

Like his cohort, the president also can't live without his "toys" — his Blackberry and his teleprompter. But is his generation's tech addiction part of the reason why he has such difficulty focusing on the one great economic problem facing the nation, choosing instead to push a 27-part agenda?

Nero fiddled while Rome burned. The fear is that this brand new generation in charge will Twitter and text while America faces potential catastrophe. It would truly be ironic if we all ended up longing for the old, fractious days of messianic idealism, when the Boomers were still in charge and everyone had to hear about Woodstock again and again.

To read the "Stark Ravings" blog, go to thePhoenix.com/blogs/starkravings. Steven Stark can be reached atsds@starkwriting.com.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: The ‘A’ word, That’s what he said, Emasculation proclamation, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Barack Obama, Barack Obama, Politics,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Gen Jones rules
I was enjoying your essay until I got to this part: "But is [President Obama's] generation's tech addiction part of the reason why he has such difficulty focusing on the one great economic problem facing the nation, choosing instead to push a 27-part agenda?" I re-read the essay and found not a single mention of any data supporting your contention that he is having any such difficulty. How did you reach this conclusion?  Did you just assume he is because he is doing more than one thing at a time and thought it justified the sociological theories you described?  What you seem to describe as ADD seems to me to be a president who is smart, thoughtful, and able to walk and chew gum at the same time.  Good thing, too, because we have a number of problems, few of which can wait until the economic problem is fixed and for which the solutions, if implemented properly, will contribute to our economic recovery, both short-term and long-term. We are also blessed with a president with experience in the classroom, which I believe is why he is spending a fair amount of time explaining to us (with IMO excellent effect) how we got into this mess in the first place, knowledge that should help us to stay out of such a predicament again. I want President Obama to address many things at once, particularly when those things are both interdependent and necessary for the foundations of our future.  I suspect I'm not alone.
By JBL in Maine on 03/20/2009 at 10:05:16
Re: Gen Jones rules
JBL writes: "I suspect I'm not alone" No, you are most certainly not alone, JBL. Maybe Stark is so used to the massive incompetencies of the Bush Presidency, which featured a man who couldn't manage one thing at a time well, much less several, that it is impossible for the writer to imagine someone who can multi-task. This is not the Generation Jones rule. Generation Jones? Never heard of it. No, this is the age of multi-tasking. I'm doing a lot more than writing this response right now. We need a president who can respond to the MultiTask Generation. And, finally, we have one.
By TheArtfulDodger on 03/20/2009 at 10:51:43

ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group