The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Boston's Severin problem

Is WTKK up to measuring degrees of intolerance?
By EDITORIAL  |  May 6, 2009

090508_editorial_home

Boston is in the thrall of two important media stories. The first concerns efforts by the financially challenged New York Times Company to keep the financially battered Boston Globe afloat.

The second story, by contrast, appears to be smaller potatoes: right-wing loud mouth Jay Severin, in a broadcast more obnoxious than usual, said things on air that forced his traditionally indulgent corporate enablers at WTKK to suspend him — though, as the Phoenix went to press, the question of for how long remained unanswered.

The fate of the Globe is of historic importance. But the questions raised by the Severin incident have a philosophical and moral resonance that has been touched upon only in passing.

Severin got himself in hot water for speaking derisively about Mexicans, who he said were "the world's lowest of primitives." Even by Severin's odious standards, this was especially ripe.

In the course of his jeremiad against Mexicans, Severin raged widely. As far as the Phoenix is concerned, the most reprehensible of Severin's many loathsome remarks was this: "So now, in addition to venereal disease and the other leading exports of Mexico — women with mustaches and VD — now we have swine flu."

He also said this: "We [the US] are the magnet for primitives around the world — and it's not the primitives' fault, by the way, I'm not blaming them for being primitives. I'm merely observing they're primitive."

And this: "Millions of leeches from a primitive country come here to leech off you and, with it, they are ruining the schools, the hospitals, and a lot of life in America."

And this: "We should be, if anything, surprised that Mexico has not visited upon us poxes of more various and serious types already, considering the number of 'criminaliens' already here."

This is strong, and offensive, stuff. Even in the midst of a serious debate about the future of United State's immigration policy — an important topic in which emotions sometime run hot — it is, or should be, unacceptable.

Severin was being more than an advocate for his anti-immigrant point of view, more than provocative, more than even incendiary. In our opinion, he was being hateful, trying to deny the basic humanity of Mexicans so as to render them unworthy of being afforded rights.

Hate speech may give offense to some; it might be impolite, even impolitic, but it is not illegal. The Phoenix is close to being absolute in its defense of anyone's right to say, write, or broadcast almost anything. This paper affirms Severin's constitutional right to say what he said. Likewise, we recognize WTKK's right to broadcast Severin if the station so wishes.

Still, WTKK should think twice about putting Severin back on the air. Does Severin's right to hold noxious opinions, and his parallel right to express them using intemperate language, override the station's right to hold itself to a higher standard?

If WTKK thinks about the situation with any depth of conscience, it might realize that, though it profits handsomely from Severin, his on-air presence does nothing to enrich or elevate public debate.

Should WTKK management have any doubts on this matter, we suggest it compare Severin's remarks about Mexicans with what Adolf Hitler wrote about Jews in Mein Kampf.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: The tax man speaketh, Father Feeney, How's Obama doing?, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Health and Fitness, Medicine, Sexual and Reproductive Health,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Boston's Severin problem
What is it about You pro-illegal immigration op-ed writer's? Why do You automatically call anyone that's anti-illegal immigration sided with a label as being anti immigration. That's the key difference. Illegal=Bad,Legal=good. Then put in perspective, most of what Jay said is true when put into the context of what the acronym criminalien actual means. Illegal immigrants. Don't call them immigrants. I understand political correctness is very important for a small leaflet's blog survival, but don't let it get in the way of facts.
By derek20 on 05/06/2009 at 4:37:06
Re: Boston's Severin problem
It is ALWAYS a mistake, I think, to resort to what Herr Prof. Dr. Leo Strauss used to call the argumentum ad Hitlerum. Happy days.
By jhmccloskey on 05/06/2009 at 5:54:17
Don't believe the Hype
If you listen to Jay, he differenciates between legal and illegal immigrants every day.  He absolutely did not direct this at all Mexicans.  I don't know about the VD claim but he is a self proclaimed expert when it comes to knowledge of other countries bunny ranches. Maybe he ordered a tainted Corona or something while on vacation down there... The worst part was the use of the word "Primatives".  Once again if you listen to him, right or wrong, he was refering to the country of Mexico being a 2nd or 3rd world country not the people.  He was specific on this point. So this is simply Jay stating the obvious; many of the illegals have no english skills, minimal education, maybe less vaccinations against disease, stuffing extra people into small living environments, etc etc etc because of where they lived before coming here.  Things that are common among this demographic that the average American doesn't even consider. I view it as a conditioning thing not a race thing and I think Jay is of the same opinion.  We are talking about people that can't or chose not to find jobs in Mexico. This IS a burden on our State and Country. Many are making due working under the table or with false SSI#'s.  Many are taking advantage of food stamps, welfare, public or subsidized housing, going to the emergency room for regular or easy to deal with illnesses. All of which directly affects me.Provocative YES... Hate Speach Not at all... Racist No Remember Jay was upset that we weren't closing the boarders immediately with the flu scare. Why not take that precaution? Because if we did then everybody will know that we can when ever we want (and we can). If you hate Jay you will think he is a racist. If you like him you will see that he isn't. It's a wash I hope it doesn't cost him his job. He must love the publicity though. Go get them Jay.
By jimmie on 05/07/2009 at 9:18:57
Re: Boston's Severin problem
I can’t tell you how glad I am to have Jay Severin off the air.  His comments on Mexicans were beyond the pale, but that's just the tip of the iceburg for me.  His arrogant and preening manner, coupled with his seeming inability to engage in thoughtful discourse, keep driving me back to NPR.    
By mar1044 on 05/08/2009 at 9:09:59
Re: Boston's Severin problem
 Phoenix editors object to Jay Severin calling illegal aliens "the world's lowest of primitives." WTKK's Michelle McPhee and a great many police officers refer to criminals who are citizens as "dirt bags," and "scum bags." These are not human characteristics. Why no objection? Why is the Phoenix silent on allowing Bill Ayers an admitted bomber to speak at Brandeis? Why is his speech protected more than Severin's?

Phoenix editors say Severin's speech should be "unacceptable," while citing no standard. Calling illegal aliens "primitives" does not "deny the basic humanity of Mexicans." Severin insults illegal aliens as a special form of humans, unlike being a "dirt bag." Eric Holder insulted white Americans. Why is the Phoenix silent?

The editors affirmed "Severin's constitutional right to say what he said" suggesting that just because he can, does not mean he should say it.

The editors say, "his on-air presence does nothing to enrich or elevate public debate" with no supporting evidence. Why not compare Severin to Ayers or Rev. Jeremiah Wright?

Just because the Phoenix editors can write editorials, does not mean that they should.
By menckenlite on 05/15/2009 at 5:54:12
Re: Boston's Severin problem
 Severin is many things.  A xenophobic loudmouthed fool.  A racist narcissistic pig.  But can't the Phoenix's braintrust come up with something less trite than comparing him to Hitler?  Michael Christian,Haverhill
By Michael Christian on 05/17/2009 at 11:21:48
Re: Boston's Severin problem
So Severin is like Hitler because he does not approve of illegal imigrants? People who defy US law and sneak into our country are not merely 'undocumented'. Before you censor someone with views different from your own, remember this poem: "In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist; And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew; And then... they came for me... And by that time there was no one left to speak up."  
By OldAsDirt on 05/26/2009 at 4:26:04

ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WHALIN' ON PALIN  |  November 24, 2009
    Give Sarah Palin this: she isn’t driven by polls. If she wanted to improve her chances at political success, she would have used her book and promotional tour to convince America that she has substance and gravitas .
  •   TAXING CATHOLICS  |  November 18, 2009
    Should the Roman Catholic Church, and the various subsidiary groups and organizations that exist under its umbrella and operate at its direction, be entitled to state- and federal-tax exemptions?
  •   COAKLEY TAKES A STAND  |  November 18, 2009
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley this week separated herself from the gang of essentially like-minded candidates seeking to fill Senator Ted Kennedy's Washington seat by rejecting the US House of Representatives compromise that traded approval of a health-care-reform bill for greater restrictions to abortion access. Good for Coakley.
  •   MENINO, AGAIN  |  November 04, 2009
    At a time when Americans are racked by anxiety about the uncertain future of a weak economy, Boston voters handily returned Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to an unprecedented fifth term.
  •   FOR MAYOR: VOTE FLAHERTY + YOON  |  November 04, 2009
    Boston’s mayoral candidates are running campaigns that are variations on a theme.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group