The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
BMPCONCERT_2009_after_2

Sunshine on the ACLU: a mea culpa

Freedom Watch
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  May 6, 2009

090509_Kaminer_main
TRUTH TO POWER: Kaminer went public with complaints most ACLU members kept to themselves.

"Standing up to your political enemies is easy, fun, and often profitable," writes Barney Frank, on the lead jacket blurb for Worst Instincts: Cowardice, Conformity, and the ACLU, Boston-based civil-liberties attorney and social critic Wendy Kaminer's firsthand account of the corruption that, since shortly after 9/11, has infected the highest levels of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "Taking public issue with your friends and allies on a matter of great principle is none of these, but it is a far more important service to others."

I've known both Frank and Kaminer since the start of their careers and the early days of my own, and I take pride in sharing with them a willingness to speak truth to power regardless of whose ox is gored. But after reading Worst Instincts (Beacon Press, 160 pages, $24.95), and Frank's blurb, I've concluded that I haven't been holding up my end. As an ACLU member since the 1960s who has served on the board of directors of the semi-autonomous Massachusetts state affiliate (ACLUM) for some three decades, I've been airing, in house, grievances against the ugly things that Kaminer, a former ACLU Massachusetts representative and an ACLUM board member like myself, took public.

Those missteps, taken by ACLU executive director Anthony Romero, are legion. Beginning when Romero took over, less than one week before 9/11, the organization drifted away from its viewpoint-neutral approach to protecting liberty. Leadership grew disdainful of internal dissent and started covering up its own errors. Ironically, it sought to restrict the dissenting speech of its board members. These fundamental flaws emerged, as Kaminer and I (among others) saw, when perhaps the ACLU was needed most — the early days of the "war on terror."

In 2003, when the New York attorney general's office accused the ACLU of violating the privacy of those who purchased items through its Web site — the same privacy rights that the ACLU insisted other organizations protect — Romero hid it from the national board. Later, in order to qualify the organization for contributions by federal employees, he agreed to consult a federal terrorist watch list before hiring anyone. When he was caught, Romero twisted and turned and covered up an action that was clearly in violation of long-standing ACLU policy against blacklists.

Kaminer, for her part, was accused by fellow board members of breaching her fiduciary duty to the ACLU by speaking to the New York Times about these and other matters. Her list of Romero's misdeeds and the board's failures is long and well documented. Worst Instincts chronicles Kaminer's unsuccessful attempts to get Romero and the national board to right the ship.

I can't review the book — I'm too close to the author and the events — but its publication does provoke a mea culpa. Kaminer tried mightily to bring Romero's highly troubling conduct first to the ACLU board, and later to the public's attention. But Romero successfully asserted control over the board and Kaminer was squeezed out — so marginalized that she declined to run for a third term in 2006.

Seeing eye-to-eye with Kaminer on the governance issues, I made a run to replace her as the ACLU's Massachusetts representative in June 2006. I lost by two votes. In September 2006, I added my point of view — albeit too timidly and to a small "insider" audience — to a national Web site set up by Ira Glasser (Romero's predecessor) and others. But I refused to fully join the public campaign, harboring, as I did, the illusion that quiet inside diplomacy could prevail without doing this essential organization undue damage. Besides, I told myself, various state affiliates, including my own in Massachusetts, did not appear to have been similarly corrupted. (I proudly remain on the ACLUM Board.)

Had I, and others, joined Kaminer and her fellow board member Michael Meyers in speaking out publicly at the time, I now believe that the campaign to reverse the dangerous culture developing within the ACLU's national leadership might have succeeded.

As Kaminer's brave book demonstrates, the ACLU's current leadership has done the organization more damage than its critics ever could, and the national board may yet regret driving off Kaminer and her allies. I am reminded of President Lyndon Johnson's response when pressure mounted from his advisers to fire FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. I'd rather have J. Edgar inside the tent pissing out, Johnson explained at the time, than outside pissing in. Kaminer is no Hoover, obviously, but Johnson's astute observation applies.

To read more by Harvey Silverglate and Wendy Kaminer, go to thePhoenix.com/freeforall. Harvey Silverglate can be reached at has@harveysilverglate.com.

Related: Free speechifying, Speak no evil?, Weed picking up speed?, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Lyndon Johnson, American Civil Liberties Union, Barney Frank,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Sunshine on the ACLU: a mea culpa
 ACLU Discrediting Itself

Promoting Wendy Kaminer's new book Barney Frank says, "Standing up to your political enemies is easy, fun, and often profitable, [t]aking public issue with your friends and allies on a matter of great principle is [. . .] a far more important service to others." (HARVEY SILVERGLATE, "Sunshine on the ACLU: a mea culpa," Freedom Watch, Boston Phoenix, May 6, 2009) Few people speak publicly. Fewer speak "truth to power regardless of whose ox is gored."

Insiders revealed that Anthony Romero lives with his life partner who is a psychiatrist. These pseudo physicians are notoriously control freaks a characteristic that is contrary to the ACLU's mission.

Silverglate says, "I refused to fully join the public campaign, harboring, as I did, the illusion that quiet inside diplomacy could prevail." Isn't this the same problem faced by citizens who try to correct government abuses? If they run for office and win they become part of the problem. Only if they remain outside of the government can they have any effect. Journalists are more interested in being invited to dinner than exposing malfeasance. See how they treat Ralph Nader?

It is true that "The ACLU's current leadership has done the organization more damage than its critics ever could." They showed me they were operating off of the rails for many years.


//thephoenix.com/Boston/News/82548-Sunshine-on-the-ACLU-a-mea-culpa/

Sunshine on the ACLU: a mea culpa
Freedom Watch
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE
May 6, 2009
By HILOMID on 05/08/2009 at 5:29:18

Best Music Poll 2009 winners
BMP_WINNERS_AD
Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group