The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Free speechifying

Letters to the Boston editor, July 17, 2009
By BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS  |  July 15, 2009

How can Dan Kennedy pick a list of people who trample freedom of expression without listing the mayor of Boston? Whether I agree or disagree with Kevin McCrea, Michael Flaherty, or Sam Yoon, I give them all the credit in the world for having the stones to run for mayor — and in the case of Yoon and Flaherty for giving up their “safe” seats in the City Council. Together, with McCrea, they have put in their time, effort, and own money in their chase to unseat the incumbent. It’s bad enough to have a mayor who thinks Dewey Square is named for Huey and Louie’s brother, but for Mayor Stonewall to repeatedly deny these people the right to debate the incumbent because he’s scared to stand, sit, or squat on his record is an utter disgrace. If that’s not trampling on their rights to be heard and a muzzling of their voices, I don’t know what is.

Mike Arnold
Dorchester

Dan Kennedy includes “free-speech stories in New England” compiled by (among other sources) “the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).” The subtitle is in part “a look at the dishonorable enemies of free speech and personal liberty in New England.” Why did this prominent media critic fail to reveal that the ACLU itself is censoring stories, expression, and speech by its own board members?

No recent phenomenon, this year national ACLU board member Wendy Kaminer published Worst Instincts about this multi-year abomination. It is a sign of the times that the ACLU is censoring speech and media critics omit reporting the fact.

Furthermore, in the Boston Police award Kennedy states: “The arrest [of Shepard Fairey] was clearly a publicity stunt, based on old warrants.” This is spinning the facts. Police in most jurisdictions do not chase down suspects for outstanding warrants. When a suspect is stopped by an officer, or if the suspect files a complaint with the police — e.g., they check for outstanding warrants. In this case, Fairey became an object of police attention due to the publicity of the suspect. Clearly this is a deceptive statement by Kennedy.

Roy Bercaw
Cambridge

Signs of the political times
Regarding your article “Asians for Yoon — or Maybe the Other Guy(s)”: I have seen a number of places that used to have one Yoon sign and now have three or four Menino signs. It’s pretty obvious some muscle was put into that. I’ve also noticed a number of Yoon and Flaherty’s signs coming down — and Menino signs put up in their place. Maybe our thin-skinned mayor really can’t stand the heat. It’s obvious he’s not a fan of debates, competition, or criticism.

Jessica Leonard
Boston

Related: Black power, Art dodgers, Tiananmen 2.0?, More more >
  Topics: Letters , Elections and Voting, Politics, Local Politics,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

ARTICLES BY BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SUSPECT PRINCIPLES  |  November 18, 2009
    I was disappointed that the Phoenix chose to describe Attorney General Martha Coakley’s stand against the health-care bill recently passed by the House of Representatives as “principled.”
  •   SOUND WORDS  |  November 11, 2009
    I appreciate the positive review Jeffrey Gantz gave to Bad Boy Made Good , the documentary film I produced, which was shown this week at the MFA.
  •   INTENTIONS GONE SOUTH  |  November 04, 2009
    Erica Corsano’s bigotry overrides some of the interesting things one might actually take away from reading her article about South Boston.
  •   GLENN BECK'S MORMON TIES  |  October 28, 2009
    Thank you for carefully illustrating the intellectual dishonesty of the right wing’s number-one glory boy.
  •   THE BATTLE FOR OUR CITY SCHOOLS  |  October 21, 2009
    In your recent story “ Boston Public-School Apartheid? ”, charter public schools are faulted for taking disadvantaged Boston students and sending them on to excellent high schools and, eventually, college. Why shouldn’t low-income students of color have access to such life-changing opportunities?

 See all articles by: BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group