The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

In a more visceral example, consider the scandal currently engulfing Duke University’s lacrosse team. The alleged victim, an “exotic dancer” hired to do a strip routine at an off-campus party last month, claimed she was forced into a bathroom and abused and sodomized by team members, who denied the accusations. When DNA tests came back negative, failing to link any of the men to the alleged attack, the Times, instead of focusing on whether the alleged victim was lying and the local North Carolina prosecutor had been fooled, actually bought the misleading line of the district attorney (currently running for re-election) that DNA evidence is not present in every sexual-assault case.

And who can forget the extent to which former Times reporter Judith Miller carried the administration’s water by publishing leaks about Saddam Hussein’s supposed “weapons of mass destruction” on the basis of which the Bush administration tried to justify going to war?

Surely there comes a time in the life of a newspaper, after repeatedly making bad calls, when it must question the motives of government leakers and spinners. These stories often lead to big headlines, but the disappointing aftermath too often leaves the newspaper with egg on its face. It’s a good bet that the story of Jared Paul Stern’s “extortion” of Ronald W. Burkle will be the latest Times rush to judgment by welcoming too heartily the proverbial Greeks bearing gifts.

On the Web
Bowdlerized Snippets of the Stern Transcript:  http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/407340p-344863c.html
Definition and explanation of "extortion": http://www.answers.com/extortion
The Times' gossipy graphic: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/09/weekinreview/09gossip_graphic_lg.gif

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
Related: Gossip columnist escapes indictment, Notes on a scandal, Southern discomfort, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Celebrity News, Entertainment, Federal Bureau of Investigation,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Sleazy? Yes. Criminal? Probably not.
I'd say the NYT is handling this story quite properly. It's true that blackmail seems to require a threat to do something unless some payment or action is taken. And it's true that Stern doesn't seem to be doing that. It's also true that he's saying he can prevent others from running false or negative stories. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd say that's awfully close. More important, however, extortion does not see to require a threatened action. From law.com: extortion n. obtaining money or property by threat to a victim's property or loved ones, intimidation, or false claim of a right (such as pretending to be an IRS agent). It is a felony in all states, except that a direct threat to harm the victim is usually treated as the crime of robbery. Blackmail is a form of extortion in which the threat is to expose embarrassing, damaging information to family, friends or the public.
By Dan Browning on 04/12/2006 at 4:48:27

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FREE SPEECH AGAIN QUASHED AT HARVARD  |  October 21, 2009
    It should come as no surprise to readers of “Freedom Watch” that yet another instance of political, intellectual, and academic censorship has sprung up at Harvard, the self-touted pinnacle of higher education.
  •   THE GATES CASE ISN'T ABOUT RACE  |  August 05, 2009
    The weeks-long hubbub over the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr. by the Cambridge Police Department has centered on race, understandably, for two reasons: 1) the African-American population has suffered inequitably in its relations with law enforcement across this country, and 2) a race story is easier for the media to tell — and to sell.
  •   MUZZLE AWARDS: COLLEGIATE DIVISION  |  July 10, 2009
    In a 1957 Supreme Court decision upholding the free-speech rights of university professors ( Sweezy v. New Hampshire ), Justice Felix Frankfurter quoted prominent South African scholars on the importance of academic freedom.
  •   GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY  |  June 24, 2009
    The US Supreme Court's June 18 decision denying prisoners access to DNA testing — a procedure that could reliably prove innocence — adds to the high court's decades-long shameful record on criminal-justice issues.
  •   ROBOJUDGE  |  June 11, 2009
    Judge Stephen Breyer, Bill Clinton's latest pick for the Supreme Court, has attracted support so broad that it spans ideological and political differences.  

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group