The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Puzzles  |  Sports  |  Television  |  Videogames

Deconstructing Dwight

How NBC's The Office silenced the snobs
By RYAN STEWART  |  September 26, 2006

060922_offfice_main
AMERICAN WORKMANSHIP: The cast of the US version of The Office

Nobody expected this. When NBC trotted out its version of The Office last spring, fans of the original BBC series reacted in one of two ways. They either dismissed it out of hand as an automatic failure, or they reasoned that while it could never approach the original, it could still be a fun diversion. But after a wobbly first season, the stateside show, which has its third season premiere tonight, September 21 — a cushy slot on NBC’s primetime lineup — has become the funniest show on television (now that Arrested Development has been put to bed). It won a deserved Emmy for best comedy, and, most importantly, people have stopped dismissing it based on their love for the English version. In fact, in the blogs and messageboards across the land, people are starting to legitimately ask the question: which one is better? US or UK? And the idea that the answer just might be “US” seems a lot less absurd than it did a year and a half ago.

To say the US version is better than the UK version isn’t a slight on the English one. In David Brent, Ricky Gervais created a brilliant, unique character — the slimy boss who tries too hard to be your friend; he’s smarmy, manic, self-absorbed, deluded, and oblivious, and during the first season, he — and the show — achieved comic heights that that will be difficult to match.

But in series two, the show took a tragic turn, as we watched Brent get his comeuppance. And frankly, seeing him unravel proved consistently more sad than funny. Situations that generated laughs in the first series produced winces and, ultimately, pity. It’s a credit to the show that they made you feel sorry for that guy, of course, but that didn’t help the show’s immediate watchability.

Steve Carrell’s Michael Scott is a similar character to David Brent, but he’s able to find a form of redemption — no matter how temporary — within each episode. He displays his vulnerabilities, and his employees pick up on them in a way they didn’t do in the UK version. He might be a jackass and a dork, but they’d miss him if he was gone. The whole thing feels a lot less mean, and as a result, it’s easier to laugh at Michael when he embarrasses himself, knowing he’ll get thrown a bone later on.

Carrell’s outstanding, but that’s hardly surprising. Unlike the rest of the American cast, he was, at very least, a known quantity. More of a surprise has been the work of the first-tier supporting cast members, particularly Jenna Fischer as Pam Beesley and Rainn Wilson as Dwight K. Schrute. While the romantic “Sam and Diane” tension between Pam and Jim Halpert (Newton native John Krasinski) — a storyline imported directly from the Beeb’s version — felt forced in the early goings, it’s become more believable as the show has progressed. The two have genuine chemistry, owing in large part to the wide-eyed, enthusiastic way Fischer plays Pam. Pam’s British counter-character Dawn (Lucy Davis) spent a lot of time moping at her desk with only hint of a genuine personality. The US version further fleshes out Pam as the cool girl who’s stuck with a hopelessly lame jock. Krasinski, for his part, does a lot with Jim the everyman by making him the nicest guy in the office (pranks on Dwight excepted).

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Tokyo roses, Review: Imagine That, 97. Toby Young, More more >
  Topics: Television , Entertainment, Media, Television,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY RYAN STEWART
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   PREP YOURSELF!  |  October 14, 2009
    So the economy sucks, you’re in a miserable rut at work, and you’re not getting any younger. What are you going to do about it?
  •   ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALLZ?  |  September 17, 2009
    These days, thanks to Internet-related information overload, football fans are more educated than ever. So why, exactly, do we need idiotic TV commentators telling us what we already know about how talented Drew Brees and Adrian Peterson are, or that the game all comes down to turnovers?
  •   INTERVIEW: JASON SCHWARTZMAN  |  September 15, 2009
    "Three seconds into reading one of Raymond Chandler's books, I want a whiskey and a cigarette."
  •   BIG SLEEPY  |  September 16, 2009
    If television is indeed a reflection of society, then to judge from what's on the screen these days, we're all surrounded by people leading seedy double lives.
  •   GOING STEADY  |  August 05, 2009
    Whenever Drug Rug come up in the press (which is happening more and more lately), writers seem to find it hard to separate the band from the relationship between founding members Sarah Cronin and Tommy Allen. Cronin and Allen are not crazy about this.

 See all articles by: RYAN STEWART

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group