Boston Ballet hitches up with John Cranko’s Romeo & Juliet
By JEFFREY GANTZ | February 20, 2008
NOT A MATCH MADE IN HEAVEN: but Larissa Ponomarenko and Nelson Madrigal did create a long
emotional line. |
Romeo & Juliet | Music by Sergei Prokofiev | Choreography by John Cranko | Staging by Jane Bourne | Sets and costumes by Susan Benson | Lighting by Christopher Dennis | With the Boston Ballet Orchestra conducted by Jonathan MCphee | Presented by Boston Ballet at the Wang Theatre; Remaining performances February 28–March 2
Future Romeos & Juliets
Nelson Madrigal & Larissa Ponomarenko | February 28, March 1 afternoon
Carlos Molina & Lorna Feijóo | February 29, March 2
Jaime Diaz & Erica Cornejo | March 1 evening |
Boston Ballet has been playing the Romeo and Juliet dating game for almost 25 years now. Bachelor #1 was the version that Choo San Goh created for the company in 1984, its events orchestrated by Fate in a gray unitard. They went out together again in 1986, 1989, and 1993, but the question never got popped. By 1997, the company had moved on to Bachelor #2, a commission from then-resident-choreographer Daniel Pelzig that was short on choreography but long on characterization. No second date for Danny, or for Bachelor #3, the Rudi van Dantzig Romeo that got staged in 2003, class warfare superseding romance. Bachelor #4? Well, Boston Ballet has had long-term relationships with John Cranko’s Onegin (1994, 1997, 2002) and The Taming of the Shrew (1995, 2004), so why not his Romeo & Juliet? They had their first date on Valentine’s Day, and though Cranko won’t ever be mistaken for Petipa or Balanchine (on the occasion of the New York visit of his Stuttgart Ballet in 1969, Arlene Croce made reference to the “gaseous, depleted, bottom-of-the-bill ballets by bottom-dog choreographer Cranko”), his Romeo, measured and weighted like Shakespeare’s original, does suit the company.Boston Ballet’s press material makes the curious statement that “Cranko’s Romeo & Juliet is widely regarded as the pre-eminent version of this enduring ballet.” Of the many versions set to Sergei Prokofiev’s 1935 score (and the few to music by Berlioz, Tchaikovsky, and Delius), the one most balletgoers are familiar with is Kenneth MacMillan’s, in large part because in 1966, just a year after its debut, it was immortalized on screen by Rudolf Nureyev and Margot Fonteyn. You can watch that and other performances of the MacMillan on DVD, as well as versions by Leonid Lavrovsky and Nureyev himself — but not the Cranko.
Which is not to say that MacMillan’s is the pre-eminent version of Romeo and Juliet. He drew from Cranko, and they both drew from Lavrovsky, who did the original Russian version for the Kirov in 1940. Cranko made his first Romeo in 1958, for La Scala, with Carla Fracci as Juliet; in 1962 he remade it for his own Stuttgart Ballet, with Marcia Haydée as Juliet. No surprise that when in 2004 Ballet.co asked Alessandra Ferri — who danced Juliet for both Cranko and MacMillan — to talk about the difference between the two, she didn’t have much to offer. Cranko’s is the more muted, the more natural; it has a circular, communal, folk-dance feel. MacMillan’s is more theatrical, more Broadway, with its insistent diagonals (underlining the Renaissance rediscovery of perspective) and repressive patriarchy and red-headed league of whores (as against Cranko’s good-time Gypsies) and cock-of-the-walk spotlight dancelets directed at the audience. (Nureyev was cockier still, particularly in his own appearances as Romeo.) Many moments in Cranko’s ballet are echoed in MacMillan’s: Juliet cupping her burgeoning breasts (that one came from Lavrovsky); Tybalt’s despairing leap at Romeo after being run through; the way Juliet cradles Romeo after discovering his body.
Related:
L’Allegro, fuss and feathers, and the ICA blues, Stacked deck, Tragic tropes and anti-tropes, More 
- L’Allegro, fuss and feathers, and the ICA blues
This year we were looking forward to dance performances at the Barbara Lee Family Foundation Theater in the new ICA.
- Stacked deck
Kenneth MacMillan’s Manon is Romeo and Juliet ’s ugly stepsister.
- Tragic tropes and anti-tropes
The only question to ask about a new Romeo and Juliet, besides “Why?”, is “Why New York City Ballet?”
- New Orleans story
When the Royal Ballet touches down at the Wang Theatre this month, quash any visions you might have of tea-and-crumpets decorum.
- Measure for measure
“Great Ball at the Court of France,” which Ensemble Doulce Mémoire presented at the First Congregational Church in Cambridge last Friday, under the auspices of the Boston Early Music Festival, was a reminder that classical music used to be all about two popular forms, song and dance.
- Bird brain
The plays of Anton Chekhov don’t take well to dance.
- Dancing in the year of the Rat
If you’re hot for Victoria’s Secret ads and addicted to Dancing with the Stars, Tango Fire will be right up your alley.
- Hit and miss
Boston Ballet didn’t need Mark Morris’s blessing in 1999, and it doesn’t need it now.
- DJ Drama
The West Coast is conspicuously under-represented.
- Too much too soon?
Two of the most exciting concerts announced for this winter are on the same date, February 24.
- Conquering heroes
One sign of Boston’s rich classical-music scene is that there are often hard choices to make when two outstanding events are scheduled at the same time.
- Less
Topics:
Dance
, Entertainment, Boston Ballet Orchestra, Daniel Pelzig, More
, Entertainment, Boston Ballet Orchestra, Daniel Pelzig, Rudolf Nureyev, Basil Rathbone, George Cukor, Jane Bourne, Margot Fonteyn, Reyneris Reyes, Sarah Wroth, Less
