Then there's the question of version. We have two, one from Venice, one from Naples. Which are you using?
We first created our own edition of Poppea for a production in Vancouver in 2004. Since then we have continued to refine it in every way. We have consulted every passage from both existing scores and chosen our preferred passages from both. The similarities are much stronger than the differences between the two sources, but it is always comforting to be able to check suspected mistakes by comparing the two. Also, this time we have been able to consult the earliest existing libretto, which has clarified even more about the possible “original” version. To be clear: neither score is an autograph manuscript from Monteverdi; both come from his direct circle of associates in the decade or so after his death. This makes the editing process somewhat of a detective story. One of the greatest authorities on the late Monteverdi operas, Ellen Rosand, will be with us for the festival and speaking at our symposia. We should have some fascinating discussions on this topic.

The instrumentation is also a matter of some debate — how much, and what kind . . .
We actually know what the usual Venetian band had: three- or four- or five-part strings (one on a part) and as many continuo players (harpsichords, theorbos, harps etc.) as they could afford — but typically two harpsichords and two theorbos. We have four-part strings (as in the Naples version), two harpsichords, two theorbos, harp, viola da gamba, and lirone. So compared to the historical Venetian troupes, we would weigh in as typical but on the opulent side for continuo.

This year the BEMF Opera is moving from the Majestic Theatre to the Calderwood Pavilion. Is that closer in size to the Teatro SS. Giovanni E Paolo, where Poppea was first staged?
Yes and no. In fact the total footprint of the Venetian theater is very close to the Cutler Majestic. BUT! . . . the internal dimensions are virtually reversed, with the much larger portion in the old theater given to the stage space (for creating long perspectives) and the smaller part with the audience piled up in tiers. The effect for the audience is of being much closer to the action — an effect that is much closer to the one we will have at the Calderwood. From our point of view, the proximity of the audience is paramount in creating the kind of intimacy we associate with spoken drama. Think of Poppea as a Shakespeare tragicomedy, with the addition of sublime music, and it will be easy to imagine how enjoyable it will be to be in an intimate space for that experience.

Monteverdi's The Coronation of Poppea | Stanford Calderwood Pavilion, 527 Tremont Street, 617-933-8600 | June 6 -14, 2009 |

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  | 
Related: Sing, sing, sing!: The 2011 winter opera forecast, Live! — sort of, Oedipus schmoedipus, More more >
  Topics: Classical , Entertainment, BCA, Stanford,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
    Fifty-four years after its groundbreaking Broadway premiere, Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun remains as dense, and as concentrated, as its title fruit.
  •   LIGHT WAVES: BOSTON BALLET'S ''ALL KYLIÁN''  |  March 13, 2013
    A dead tree hanging upside down overhead, with a spotlight slowly circling it. A piano on stilts on one side of the stage, an ice sculpture's worth of bubble wrap on the other.
  •   HANDEL AND HAYDN'S PURCELL  |  February 04, 2013
    Set, rather confusingly, in Mexico and Peru, the 1695 semi-opera The Indian Queen is as contorted in its plot as any real opera.
  •   REVIEW: MAHLER ON THE COUCH  |  November 27, 2012
    Mahler on the Couch , from the father-and-son directing team of Percy and Felix Adlon, offers some creative speculation, with flashbacks detailing the crisis points of the marriage and snatches from the anguished first movement of Mahler's unfinished Tenth Symphony.
    "Without The Nutcracker , there'd be no ballet in America as we know it."

 See all articles by: JEFFREY GANTZ