What will the highest court say about same-sex matrimony?
By JEFF INGLIS | June 2, 2010
It's a given that, at some point — whether in these DOMA challenges or some other future cases — the US Supreme Court will hear a case relating to same-sex marriage. Can we read any tea leaves for indications of how they will rule?Quoted in a National Law Journal article last August, Michael Dorf of Cornell Law School predicted that the justices would take a broader view than just examining "technical legal issues," saying they would "think about whether it's right" in light of their individual views.
With the departure of Justice John Paul Stevens, who has been the court's leader in opposing discrimination and protecting gay rights, we have only two recent rulings to examine for guidance.
In January, the court reversed conventional wisdom in a split decision, with the conservative majority saying it is not gays and lesbians who needed protection from "harassment as a result of public disclosure" of their sexuality, but rather the opponents of same-sex marriage who face public scorn for their views and need legal protection for their freedom of expression.
And in March, a solo ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. refused to prevent same-sex marriage from becoming legal in Washington, DC, basing his decision in part on the failure of Congress to act on that matter. Justices reviewing a challenge to DOMA will encounter a very different stance from Congress, and may well base their decisions in part on that.
Related:
Visiting hours, Open service, Fighting back, More 
- Visiting hours
Hospitals cannot bar one member of a same-sex couple from visiting the other member during medical treatment, according to an April order by President Barack Obama.
- Open service
A deal between the Obama administration, congressional Democrats, and the Pentagon that will repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law banning homosexuals from serving openly in the US military was approved last week by the House and the Senate Armed Services Committee, though action by the full Senate may not come for months.
- Fighting back
Thanks to a federal law that codifies discrimination against same-sex couples, more than 15,000 legally married couples (and an untold number of children) are being denied basic benefits, such as the right to file their taxes jointly, or Social Security payments and health-insurance subsidies.
- Benign neglect?
If you are gay or lesbian, or if you care about realizing social justice, you must be wondering when Obama is going to turn his attention to the fact that one in 10 of the nation's more than 230 million adults are second-class citizens.
- State House status
Rhode Island voters, for all their supposed insularity, are an increasingly progressive bunch.
- Heck of a Guy
Scott Brown’s stunning victory in January’s special US Senate election continues to reverberate through Massachusetts politics.
- Corporate love
Here’s a modest proposal for resolving the problems associated with marriage: Abolish it.
- Review: 8: The Mormon Proposition
While we were getting decriminalized weed in Massachusetts, a large segment of the population was reeling from the devastating passage of Proposition 8 in California.
- After the Question 1 vote
Last Tuesday, Maine became the 31st state to put same-sex marriage to a public vote — and to have it lose.
- A step forward
The nation’s understandable preoccupation with the unfolding economic crisis has overshadowed a significant victory in the battle for same-sex marriage: the Connecticut Supreme Court, on October 10, ruled that gay and lesbian couples have a constitutional right to marry.
- Unmaking a bad federal law
It's been a depressing stretch for supporters of marriage equality.
- Less
Topics:
News Features
, Barack Obama, Health and Fitness, Social Issues, More
, Barack Obama, Health and Fitness, Social Issues, Health Care Issues, John Roberts (Chief Justice), John Paul Stevens, Judiciary, U.S. Courts, Same-Sex Marriage, U.S. Supreme Court, Less
