Who wins? Who loses?

By DAVID SCHARFENBERG  |  December 29, 2010

Indeed, given Chafee's generally moderate approach to governance, it might be too much to expect a radical shift in the orientation of the board. But there could be some flash points when it comes to education reform, writ large: charter schools, among them.

The state pledged a major charter expansion when it won $75 million in federal education aid through the Race to the Top competition. Chafee, though, says he has concerns about the performance of the academies — and the drain they place on the rest of the school system.

Gist has suggested that a reneging on the pledged expansion could threaten Rhode Island's award. And it remains to be seen if Chafee will press the issue. But his talk has been pretty tough.

The governor-elect was on vacation as the Phoenix went to press this week. But his spokesman Mike Trainor emphasized that Chafee is in favor of a "moratorium" on charter school development while he reviews data on effectiveness — data that seems unlikely to improve in the coming months.

Education reform, of course, is not limited to K-12. The neglect of the state's higher education system is approaching something like a crisis. And while a major fix will be near-impossible in the current budget climate, expect Speaker Fox — who considers his Rhode Island College education transformative — to make some moves in this direction.


FEDERAL CLOUT

Rhode Island, as a whole, might be considered a loser when it comes to the national elections.

The state's entire delegation is Democratic, of course, and the GOP tide means Representative James Langevin and Representative-elect David Cicilline will find themselves in the minority on the House side.

Rhode Island's clout in the chamber takes a further hit with the departure of retiring Representative Patrick J. Kennedy, whose gold-plated name and plum spot on the House Appropriations Committee was of great value.

Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse will still be in the majority in their chamber. But the Democratic margin will be thinner there. And Reed's seat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, while still a major asset for the state, could be of diminished importance if a GOP pledge to ban earmarks holds up.

Bottom line: even if you voted for the pols who won in November, you still managed to lose. This is Rhode Island, after all.

David Scharfenberg can be reached at dscharfenberg@phx.com.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
  Topics: News Features , Politics, elections, Rhode Island College,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DAVID SCHARFENBERG
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   LIBERAL WARRIOR  |  April 10, 2013
    When it comes to his signature issues — climate change, campaign finance reform, tax fairness — Whitehouse makes little secret of his approach: marshal the facts, hammer the Republicans, and embarrass them into action.
  •   AT BROWN, A WIN FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVISTS  |  April 11, 2013
    A key Brown University oversight committee has voted to recommend the school divest from coal, delivering a significant victory to student climate change activists.
  •   HACKING POLITICS: A GUIDE  |  April 03, 2013
    Last year, the Internet briefly upended everything we know about American politics.
  •   BREAK ON THROUGH  |  March 28, 2013
    When I spoke with Treasurer Gina Raimondo this week, I opened with the obligatory question about whether she'll run for governor. "I'm seriously considering it," she said. "But I think as you know — we've talked about it before — I have little kids: a six-year-old, an eight-year-old. I'm a mother. It's a big deal."
  •   THE LIBERAL CASE FOR GUNS  |  March 27, 2013
    The school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut spurred hope not just for sensible gun regulation, but for a more nuanced discussion of America's gun culture. Neither wish has been realized.

 See all articles by: DAVID SCHARFENBERG