RI’s homeless bill of rights

By DAVID SCHARFENBERG  |  June 27, 2012

Official Rhode Island's response to the homelessness problem has been uninspiring, on the whole.

But in the just-completed legislative session, something remarkable, if little-noticed happened: Rhode Island became the first state in the nation to pass a homeless bill of rights.

The measure gives the homeless the right to "move freely in public spaces," including sidewalks and parks.

The homeless, the measure affirms, have the right to vote and the right to equal care in hospitals. Employers, under the law, can't discriminate against a potential employee, or existing employee, who claims a shelter as a residence.

The law, according to a statement from the National Law Center on Homeless & Poverty, "stands in stark contrast to the national trend we're seeing toward the criminalization of poverty."

A November 2011 report from the Washington-based organization found a growing number of municipal ordinances cracking down on panhandling and camping or loitering in particular public places.

The National Law Center is embroiled in a lawsuit against the city of Dallas, now, over an ordinance that places restrictions on where charitable groups can distribute food to the homeless.

John Joyce, the formerly homeless co-director of the Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project, says he was sitting on his couch eating popcorn and drinking soda when he drafted the first version of the bill with co-director Megan Smith.

Joyce and Smith worked with the ACLU to hone the bill. And there were a few compromises along the way. They dropped a provision declaring a right to housing. And after police objected to a line that spoke, specifically, to equal treatment by law enforcement, they replaced it with a more generic — and far-reaching — line on equal treatment "by all state and municipal agencies."

Joyce says the measure was born of the indignities the homeless face on a daily basis — shuffled out of the library, their personal property thrown away. "When you don't have a home, you are looked down on, you are stereotyped," he says.

Homeless advocates say they don't intend to use the measure as a legal cudgel — though they'll take action where required — but as a way to start conversations with police chiefs and emergency room doctors and business leaders.

They also hope, in the long run, to start a conversation with the nation, to spur similar legislation elsewhere.

Karen Jeffreys of the Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless says her organization, which advocated for the bill, has already received calls from advocates in San Francisco and Washington and from a wire service for the nation's network of street newspapers.

Rhode Island, too often small on homelessness issues, is looking rather large at the moment.

Related: Rhode Island's ticking time bomb, You Snus you lose, Chafee and the hazards of a bold politics, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Washington, Rhode Island, Law,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   LIBERAL WARRIOR  |  April 10, 2013
    When it comes to his signature issues — climate change, campaign finance reform, tax fairness — Whitehouse makes little secret of his approach: marshal the facts, hammer the Republicans, and embarrass them into action.
    A key Brown University oversight committee has voted to recommend the school divest from coal, delivering a significant victory to student climate change activists.
  •   HACKING POLITICS: A GUIDE  |  April 03, 2013
    Last year, the Internet briefly upended everything we know about American politics.
  •   BREAK ON THROUGH  |  March 28, 2013
    When I spoke with Treasurer Gina Raimondo this week, I opened with the obligatory question about whether she'll run for governor. "I'm seriously considering it," she said. "But I think as you know — we've talked about it before — I have little kids: a six-year-old, an eight-year-old. I'm a mother. It's a big deal."
  •   THE LIBERAL CASE FOR GUNS  |  March 27, 2013
    The school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut spurred hope not just for sensible gun regulation, but for a more nuanced discussion of America's gun culture. Neither wish has been realized.

 See all articles by: DAVID SCHARFENBERG