Up in the air

Going Green
By DEIRDRE FULTON  |  July 3, 2012

In late June, Maine senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins voted for our health when they voted against a proposal to block the Environmental Protection Agency's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for power plants. The new standards, finalized in December 2011, are the first to limit mercury and other toxic emissions. (Never mind that the Clean Air Act amendments mandating the creation of those standards were passed 20 years ago!)

According to the EPA, MATS would reduce emissions of heavy metals, including mercury, arsenic, chromium, and nickel, as well as acid gases and sulfur dioxide. All of these are known or suspected to cause everything from certain cancers to asthma, bronchitis, and respiratory illness. Oil- and coal-fired power plants are the largest remaining source of mercury emissions into the air, and from there into the water, where toxins pollute water sources and fish populations. The EPA estimates that once the new rules are implemented, the human health savings will be between $37 billion and $90 billion per year.

Apparently these facts fell on some deaf ears. In early 2012, Republican senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma introduced a bill to "disapprove" of MATS — thereby nullifying both its force and effect. In an opinion piece published at CNN.com, Inhofe called MATS "the centerpiece of President Obama's war on coal. . . . this rule will destroy jobs and cause energy prices to skyrocket."

Maine's Republican senators rejected this.

In its own defense, the EPA claims that MATS will create 46,000 short-term and 8000 long-term jobs, that upgrades will not lead to utility-rate increases, and that the total national cost of this rule will be under $10 billion.

Three plants in Maine are covered by the new standards — the oil-fired Wyman plant in Yarmouth (see "This is Why We're So $%&@^# Hot," by Christian MilNeil, July 29, 2011), as well as ones in Rumford (coal) and Ashland (oil). They, along with about 1400 other plants, have four years to comply with the new rules.

"Certainly, the bulk of mercury pollution comes from coal-fired power plants, and Maine gets a lot of 'tailpipe' pollution from those out-of-state power plants," says Ben Seel, a clean air organizer for the advocacy organization Environment Maine. "The effects of the mercury pollution in Maine are reflected in statewide advisories from the Maine Bureau of Health, which recommend that pregnant women, women of childbearing age, and young children limit their fish consumption based on the type of fish they consume."

Another nearby plant that may have to upgrade its existing pollution controls or install new ones to be in accordance with MATS is the Schiller Station in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. This coal power plant — visible from the bridge that crosses into Maine — recently came under fire from both the Maine and New Hampshire chapters of the Sierra Club, which claim that Schiller is polluting Portsmouth and Southern Maine with high levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2). The Schiller Station will violate new SO2 regulations when they go into effect, the Sierra Club says.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Voting,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DEIRDRE FULTON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   NUMBER CRUNCHERS  |  July 23, 2014
    Maybe instead of devoting still-more resources to food reviews, Maine’s leading news organizations should spend money on keeping better tabs on Augusta.
  •   BLUESTOCKING FILM SERIES SHOWCASES WOMEN'S STORIES  |  July 16, 2014
    Among last year’s 100 top-grossing films, women represented just 15 percent of protagonists, and less than one-third of total characters.
  •   CHECKING IN: THE NEW GUARD AND THE WRITER'S HOTEL  |  July 11, 2014
    Former Mainer Shanna McNair started The New Guard, an independent, multi-genre literary review, in order to exalt the writer, no matter if that writer was well-established or just starting out.
  •   NO TAR SANDS  |  July 10, 2014
    “People’s feelings are clear...they don’t want to be known as the tar sands capitol of the United States."
  •   YOUR GUIDE TO ALL THINGS PRIDE!  |  June 19, 2014
    From the outset, O’Connor says, they were “foward-focused” — they had to be, given that they were basically starting from scratch — and committed to being as inclusive, positive, accessible, and transparent as possible.

 See all articles by: DEIRDRE FULTON